View clinical trials related to Back Pain.
Filter by:The primary purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a brief educational program and of an additional program in physical therapy, for the treatment of low back pain in Primary Care of the Spanish National Health Service. This is a controlled, cluster randomized community trial.
The purpose of this study is to determine to what extent and by what physiological mechanisms Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) affects selected conditions related to pregnancy, labor and delivery.
The primary purpose of your participation in this study is to help answer the following research question, and not to provide you treatment for your condition. Whether duloxetine once daily can help patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. Patients who do not have their pain reduced by at least 30% by week 7 will be given 120 mg dose for the duration of the study. After the 13 week double blind period, patients randomized to placebo will switch to duloxetine 60 mg or 120 mg in the 41-week extension period.
This pilot study will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Axiom Worldwide DRX9000 for active treatment of chronic low back pain.
The purpose of this open-label, extension study is to characterize the safety, effectiveness, and impact on quality of life measures of long-term repeated dosing of OROS hydromorphone slow release (8, 16, 32 and 64 mg tablets) in patients with chronic low back pain.
The primary purpose of your participation in this study is to help answer the following research question, and not to provide you treatment for your condition--Whether duloxetine once daily can help patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.
Low back pain (LBP) is the most frequent cause of sick leave and disability pension, and degenerative and osteoarthritic (OA) changes is a significant cause of pain and disability. Some indications exist for symptomatic and possible cartilage-structurmodifying effect on knee- and hip-osteoarthritis with glucosamine sulphate (GS). The OA process in the lumbar spine is most likely to OA processes in knees and hips, hence GS could have comparable symptomatic and structural effect on lumbar OA. Study hypothesis: No difference in treatment effect exists between oral intake of GS- or placebo-capsules for patients` with chronic low back pain measured with Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.
The primary objective of this study is to assess the effects of varying pulse width in suprathreshold dorsal column stimulation in patients with low back pain.
The purpose of the study was to characterize the safety, effectiveness, and impact on quality of life (QOL) measures of OROS® hydromorphone HCL in patients with chronic low back pain.
Surgical methods offered to patients with chronic low back pain are controversial. In addition, new and expensive treatment methods like total disc replacemet (TDR) are a challenge for the health care services. At present, ongoing randomized studies in both Europe and USA are comparing TDR to fusion. However, to our knowledge, no randomized trials have compared TDR to non-surgical treatment. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of a comprehensive and structured non-surgical treatment with TDR surgery in patients with chronic low back pain and localized degenerative disc changes. Main hypothesis: There is no difference in treatment effect between surgery with lumbar total disc prosthesis and a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program measured by Oswestry Disability Index after 1 and 2 years. Secondary hypothesis: There is no difference in cost - effectiveness between surgery with lumbar disc prosthesis and a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program after 1 and 2 years.