View clinical trials related to Atrophic Scar.
Filter by:There are more than 100 million patients who develop scar formation caused by various factors, such as post-inflammatory acne and trauma (1). They often have physical, aesthetic, psychological, and social barriers. Scar tissue is naturally a stage of wound healing. Abnormal wound healing produces a spectrum of scar tissue types such as atrophic, hypertrophic, and keloid scars (2). Atrophic scars are dermal depressions, which are commonly caused by the destruction of collagen following inflammatory process. This permanent disfiguring sequelae correlates with the duration of pathology, severity of lesion, and delay in therapy (3). Treatment of atrophic acne scars remains a therapeutic challenge, yet there is no standard option as the most effective treatment (4). A range of possible options has been investigated including surgical techniques (subcision, non-ablative laser treatment, resurfacing techniques (ablative laser treatment, dermabrasion), and injection or dermal fillers or fat, and a combination of two or more modalities (5). Ultrasound is a unique non-invasive and non-radiating medical imaging tool in the investigation of dermatological diseases by providing detailed anatomic and physiologic data of skin lesions and deeper soft tissue changes. Lesion size in three dimensions-lengths, width, and depth, morphology, the detailed anatomic information provided by sonography is useful to assessment of effect of different types of treatment modality to improve atrophic scar and avoid invasive assessment tools as punch biopsy for histopathological examination (6)
The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the safety and tolerability for 12 weeks after one dose of TRTP-101 in adults with atrophic scars.
The current post-market clinical investigation has been designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CELLBOOSTER® Lift, a HA-based product marketed by SUISSELLE SA. For this purpose, healthy subjects with signs of skin aging with mild to moderate wrinkles, skin laxity, dry and dull skin on the face, received a 3-session treatment and were followed-up over a 4-month period after the initial injection. Several objective measurements of skin quality were performed with different parameters: skin elasticity, density, dryness, microcirculation, wrinkles, color/homogeneity. Clinical improvement was also evaluated, as well as subject and investigator satisfactions. The safety of the injections was also followed with injection site reactions and adverse events collection.
This clinical study wants to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a medical device combining "Polynucleotide Highly Purified Technology" (PN-HPT™) and hyaluronic acid (Newest-Mastelli S.r.l) for treating moderate-to-severe atrophic post-acne scars.
To evaluate the efficacy of CO2 versus fractional CO2 laser versus platelet rich plasma in treatment of atrophic scars using clinical assessment and ultrasonography
The 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond lasers using fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) was a promising therapy for skin resurfacing. However, no studies have compared P-MLA with ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG lasers (AF-Er) in treating atrophic acne scars. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of P-MLA and AF-Er for the treatment of atrophic acne scars, we performed a prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled trial. Thirty-one Asian patients underwent four consecutive sessions of randomized split-face treatment with P-MLA and AF-Fr at 4-week intervals.
Subjects will be randomized to receive up to 1cc of Juvéderm Vollure on one side of their face and up to 1cc of Saline on the other. On Day 30, this treatment with the same left-right assignment can be repeated. Subjects will return 24-48 hours after their first treatment to fill out questionnaires, take pictures, and to be assessed by blinded evaluators regarding short term adverse events. Subjects will fill out a 30 day subject diary and also return 30 and 90 days after their last treatment to fill out questionnaires, take pictures, complete the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and to be assessed on the QGSGS and for long-term adverse events by blinded evaluators. At 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months, the subjects will return to fill out questionnaires, take pictures, and to be assessed by blinded evaluators for long-term efficacy.
The Objectives of this randomized controlled trial aiming to establishing a protocol of post scar revision care and to Study the effect of PRP and/or Adipose derived Mesenchymal Stem cell injection in improvement of atrophic scar after scar revision.