Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05603637 |
Other study ID # |
PFA-RFA Thrombo |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
November 1, 2022 |
Est. completion date |
February 1, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2023 |
Source |
Charles University, Czech Republic |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The aim of the study is to compare platelet activation, activation of the coagulation and
inflammation cascade during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using radiofrequency or
pulsed-field energy. Patients with atrial fibrillation and standard indication for ablation
according to the current guidelines will be randomized to ablation either using
radiofrequency of pulsed-field energy. The endpoints will be parameters of platelet
activation, activation of coagulation, and changes in inflammatory markers during ablation.
Description:
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) , i.e. pulmonary vein isolation, is associated
with the activation of platelets, coagulation cascade and inflammatory parameters. Thrombus
in the left atrium could arise on sheaths or wires, but the highest risk presents the
ablations itself. Radiofrequency ablation leads to immediate endocardial damage that presents
strong pro-thrombotic milieu. To avoid thrombus formation on catheters in the left atrium,
heparin with target activated clotting time (ACT) of 250-300 is given during the procedure.
Newly, pulsed - field ablation has been widely emerged. Since the pulsed-field energy
presents substantially different kind of ablation energy, and the mechanism of action differs
substantially (no thermal injury, no acute necrosis), also the effect on platelets,
coagulation and inflammatory parameters could differ substantially.
The investigators therefore initiate a study comparing the effect of radiofrequency and
pulsed-field ablation on parameters of platelet activation, coagulation and inflammation
during catheter ablation.
Patients with AF indicated for catheter ablation according current guidelines will be
randomized to radiofrequency or pulsed-field ablation. The procedure will be done using
standard approach from one or both femoral veins under moderate analgesia. Using intracardiac
echocardiography, and by means of SL1 sheath (Abbott, USA), transseptal puncture will be
done. In patients in the radiofrequency arm, Lasso (circular mapping catheter) will be
inserted in all four pulmonary veins, and using Smart Touch ablation catheter (Biosense
Webster, USA), pulmonary vein isolation will be done with target ablation index of 400 on
anterior and superior aspects of pulmonary veins and 350 of the posterior wall of the left
atrium. In patients in the pulsed-field arm, SL1 sheath will be replaced by Faradrive sheath
(Boston Scientific, USA), and pulmonary vein isolation will be done using Farawave catheter
(Boston Scientific, USA).
Blood samples will be drawn at the beginning of the procedure from the right atrium (S1),
after the transeptal puncture before the ablation from the left atrium (S2), after the
ablation when all 4 pulmonary vein are isolated (S3), 24 hours after the procedure before
patient discharge (S4), and 3 months after the procedure during follow-up.
Platelet activity will be determined using flow cytometry (membrane expression of P-selectin
(CD62P) antigen, active part of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (PAC-1), CD 41/61 antigens).
Changes in coagulation will be determined by measuring D-dimers and fibrin-monomers.
Regarding the inflammatory parameters, plasma concentration of interleukin-6, and membrane
activation antigens on leukocytes will be assessed using flow cytometry.