View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:The aim of the Perioperative Anticoagulant Use for Surgery Evaluation (PAUSE) Study, is to establish a safe, standardized protocol for the perioperative management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are receiving a novel oral anticoagulant (DOAC) drug, either dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban, and require an elective surgery/procedure.
Study objective is to demonstrate that anticoagulation with the direct factor Xa inhibitor apixaban is not less safe than Vitamin-K-antagonists (VKA) therapy in patients undergoing catheter ablation of non-valvular AF in the prevention of peri-procedural complications. The AXAFA trial will compare peri-ablational treatment with apixaban to peri-ablational treatment wit VKA in a randomized trial of patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF).
Dynamic indices of preload depending on the heart-lung interaction require sinus rhythm and cannot be applied to patients with atrial fibrillation. PEEP-induced increase in central venous pressure (CVP) was shown to be a valid predictor of fluid responsiveness after cardiac surgery in patients with sinus rhythm, and was speculated to be of value in patients with rhythm other than sinus. The aim of this study is to assess the predictability of PEEP-induced increase in CVP and passive leg raising (PLR)-induced changes in stroke volume index (SVI) on fluid responsiveness in patients with atrial fibrillation following valvular heart surgery.
This prospective, randomized study will investigate, if information of the catheter force during ablation of a left anterior line does reduce total RF application time by prevention of ineffective lesions.
The One Freeze study is a prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of one vs. two cryoablations per pulmonary vein for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.
This is the evaluation which is associated with apnea symptom, one of the recurrence factors, after AF ablation to patients who diagnosed AF. This is the evaluation which is associated with excessive respiration exercise during AF ablation to patients who diagnosed AF. This is the evaluation which is associated with excessive respiration exercise to make a gap during AF ablation to patients who diagnosed AF.
The purpose of this study is to examine whether patients can use the AliveCor case to record their heart rhythm and to assess the accuracy of the software in detecting AF vs sinus rhythm
The purpose of this clinical study is to assess the single procedure outcomes of using cryoballoon ablation without additional empirical lesions and/or complex fractionated electrogram (CFE) ablations for patients with early persistent atrial fibrillation (<1 year from first diagnosis of persistent AF).
The presence of intracardiac thrombi and their propensity for systemic embolism is a major concern in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) undergoing cardioversion and ablation procedures. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the clinical gold standard imaging modality for visualization of the right atrial appendage (RAA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) for detection of thrombi as well as risk factors associated with thrombus formation, including spontaneous echo contrast and low LAA velocity. However, TEE is a moderately invasive procedure that incurs additional risk, cost, and patient discomfort. In addition, thrombus detection via TEE may be ambiguous, and another tool capable of confirming uncertain TEE findings is desirable. This is particularly crucial in cases when adequate LAA imaging cannot be acquired or if TEE is clinically contraindicated, requiring alternative imaging modalities that can visualize these structures. Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) provides high-imaging resolution and is routinely used during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures for transseptal puncture and periprocedural catheter visualization. A majority of imaging acquired during AF ablation is performed with the ICE catheter in the right atrium (RA). However, these standard views are often unable to provide sufficient visualization of the LAA structure due to the relatively long distance between the ICE catheter and LAA. Placement of the ICE catheter in the pulmonary artery (PA) provides improved visualization of the LAA over other locations by reducing the anatomic distance between the imaging catheter and structure of interest. Recent retrospective studies have confirmed improved assessment of the LAA with ICE imaging from the PA and equivocal sensitivity and specificity when compared with TEE for evaluation of LAA thrombus. However, these studies did not systematically evaluate the presence of SEC, flow velocity, the LAA dimensions, or the RAA. Although these studies support the use of ICE imaging from the PA to clarify or confirm TEE findings, a prospective and blinded study evaluating both the LAA and RAA in its entirety is required. We hypothesize that this prospective and blinded study will confirm ICE as non-inferior to TEE in the assessment of LAA and RAA structure and for the detection of thrombi.
We are investigating ways to help patients with heart failure, which is caused by damaged hearts which function less well, and cause symptoms of breathlessness, fatigue, lack of energy and swelling. Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) pacemakers are used to improve the pumping function of the main heart chamber in certain suitable people with heart failure. CRT requires a pacemaker with 2 wires, one placed inside the right heart chamber and one normally placed on the outside of the left heart chamber. These two wires act together to re-time the coordination of the heartbeat, which is known to improve heart function. The investigators are assessing whether they might be able to improve heart function even more by placing two wires on the inside of the left heart chamber, rather than one around the outside. The investigators wish to assess whether: 1. Using two wires within the left side of the heart gives a greater increase in heart function than one. 2. It is possible to choose the best spot inside of the heart by measuring the pattern of the heart beat. 3. Is it possible to use a different type of heart monitor placed outside the body instead of a monitor wire inside the heart to assess improvement in heart function? They are investigating this in people with hearts that beat less effectively than normal.