View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:--- Background and study aim Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an irregular heart rhythm which causes a five-fold increase in the risk of stroke. Approximately one in ten people aged over 70 have AF. If AF is recognised then the risk of stroke can be reduced by taking tablets regularly. AF can be difficult to recognise as it can occur without symptoms and only intermittently. Consequently, AF is not recognised in many people, meaning they live with an increased risk of stroke. Therefore, it is important to find ways to identify AF more reliably. Recently, wearable devices have been developed which could be useful for identifying AF. Several devices can monitor heart activity in daily life, including wristbands, smart watches and chest patch monitors. The aim of this study is to assess the acceptability and performance of wearables for use in AF screening in older adults. The primary objective is to determine the feasibility of measuring inter-beat-intervals using a wristband. The secondary objectives are: (i) to determine the acceptability of wearables; (ii) to determine the acceptability of the screening approach; (iii) to assess the performance of wearables for acquiring signals; (iv) to assess the performance of signal processing algorithms; and (v) to assess the performance of wearables for AF screening. --- Who can participate? Selected people who have previously participated in the SAFER Programme can participate in this study. The Investigators will invite previous SAFER Programme participants to also participate in this study, aiming to enrol 65 without AF, and 65 with AF. --- What does the study involve? Participants will be asked to wear three devices for seven days: Two wristbands (like watches), and one chest patch (like a plaster). These devices will collect measurements of their heart's activity. The Investigators will also ask participants to tell them how they found wearing the devices by completing a questionnaire. The Investigators will compare how participants found wearing each device, and how accurately each device identifies AF. --- What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? There will be no direct benefit to participants, although this research is intended to benefit future patients like them. Some participants may experience irritation or redness whilst wearing a chest patch - participants will be advised that if this occurs then they should remove it straightaway.
Rationale: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a highly prevalent cardiac arrhythmia. AF is classified as paroxysmal or persistent AF, based on the duration and persistency of the arrhythmia. Despite state-of-the-art pharmacological therapies targeting the ventricular rate or aiming to restore sinus rhythm, many patients with persistent AF stay symptomatic. Catheter ablation, endocardial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in particular, is the most commonly applied approach to treat drug refractory persistent AF, but particularly in this patient group results are modest. Alternatively, the PVs can be approached epicardially by thoracoscopic surgery to isolate the PVs. This approach is more efficacious, at the cost of a more invasive procedure and longer hospital stay. However, no studies have been conducted comparing catheter with thoracoscopic ablation in patients with persistent AF as a primary invasive procedure after failing treatment with anti-arrhythmic medication. Objective: This current study aims to assess a patient specific therapy plan for patients with persistent AF by randomizing thoracoscopic versus catheter ablation for PVI without adjuvant substrate ablation in those patients. Study design: This is a prospective, non-blinded randomized multicenter study. Subjects will be randomized (1:1) to one of the two study-arms (thoracoscopic surgical or catheter PVI). The follow-up will last 5 years, with heart rhythm monitoring at three and six months, one year and yearly in the following years. In case AF recurs during the first year, the subject will receive the treatment of the otherother arm, or according to patient choice or clinical routine. Study population: Patients with an indication for invasive treatment of persistent AF. Intervention: Thoracoscopic surgical or catheter PVI without additional lesions.
The general objective of this study is to: A. To identify novel plasmatic biomarkers associated with prevalent/incident atrial fibrillation in patients with high risk for AF and stroke. B. To assess predictive ability of novel plasmatic biomarkers (especially apelin and miRNAs) on prevalent/incident atrial fibrillation in patients with high risk for AF and stroke. C. To validate predictive models from previous studies based on comorbidities, age, sex, BMI, NT-proBNP, FGF-23, IGF-1 and IGFBP-1 on prevalent/incident AF in patients with high risk for AF and stroke.
Comparison of COVID-19 disease course in hospitalized patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 in first and second waves of the novel coronavirus infection
The POPULAR-LAAO registry is an open-label observational prospective registry to investigate hemostatic processes following left atrial appendage occlusion.
Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is an effective treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Single shot devices are increasingly used for PVI. Currently, Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is the most frequently used single shot technology and hence is the benchmark for upcoming technologies. A novel cryoballoon technology has recently been introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific). However, whether PolarX provides effectiveness similar to the standard-of-practice Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon is yet to be investigated. Given that PolarX was developed considering the reported limitations and potential failures associated with the Medtronic Arctic Front cryoballoon, it might be even more effective and safe for use in AF ablation procedures. The aim of this trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) and the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. This is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. Given that the Medtronic Arctic Front Cryoballoon is the standard-of-practice for single shot PVI and the PolarX is the novel technology, this trial has a non-inferiority design. The hypothesis with regards to the primary efficacy endpoint is that the PolarX Cryoballoon (Boston Scientific) shows lower efficacy compared to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon (Medtronic) and that therefore more episodes of first recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia between days 91 and 365 will be observed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI. Hence the alternative hypothesis postulates that the PolarX Cryoballoon is non-inferior to the Arctic Front Cryoballoon. Rejection of the null hypothesis is needed to conclude non-inferiority.
Patients who have undergone cardiac ablation will be randomized and blinded to one of two groups; one group will receive dronedarone while the other group will receive a placebo. The incidence of atrial fibrillation recurrence, as well as atrial fibrosis progression, will be analyzed between the two trial groups.
To evaluate the progression of atrial myopathy through wearable devices and cardiac imaging.
Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation is typically performed in predefined anatomic regions of the left atrium without attempting to identify patient-specific areas of interest. This procedure is referred to as Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI). The hypothesis in this Study is that a tailored ablation strategy targeting areas of spatio-temporal dispersion in combination with PVI is superior to an anatomical ablation strategy targeting PVI alone for the treatment of persistent AF.
The etiology of the radiation cystitis is a pelvic irradiation generally performed as part of the treatment of prostate cancer. The incidence is 50,000 new cases per year. Approximately 35% of prostate cancer treatment is radiotherapy. The prevalence of haematuric radiation cystitis is 4-5% (about 800 patients). One of the complications of radiation cystitis is persistent hematuria. There is currently no curative treatment for this hematuria. There are few treatment options with a random probability of improvement of this symptomatology. These haematurias are rarely resolved spontaneously and most of the time involve emergency room management with +/- invasive procedures, sometimes by hospitalisation, always with a significant psychological impact on the patient. Furthermore, lifetime anticoagulant treatment considerably increases the likelihood of bladder bleeding. This is the case of patients being followed for Atrial Fibrillation Cardiac Arrhythmia (AFCA), which by definition carries a major cardioembolic risk, and who will be of particular interest in this study. In recent years, cardiologists have developed an alternative to anticoagulants: left atrial appendage closure or left atrial occlusion (LAO) . This procedure consists of inserting a nitinol prosthesis in the left atrium, the site of more than 90% of thrombi formation in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. This minimally invasive procedure lasts about 15 minutes and is performed during a 48-hour hospitalization. Anticoagulants are stopped the day after the setting up procedure. Several studies have shown non-inferiority of atrial closure and anticoagulants to thromboembolic events in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. In addition, LAO allows the permanent discontinuation of anticoagulants, associated with the cessation of anticoagulant bleeding adverse events. While studies have been conducted on the impact of this technique on patients monitored in cardiology, no studies evaluate the value of LAO in anticoagulated patients with a hematuric radiation cystitis. This tprocedure is already used in routine care for patients followed in urology, and has shown encouraging results, since 8 out of 10 patients saw a significant reduction in the number of haematurias, but it has never yet been scientifically proven to be effective, hence the aim of this study. The interest of this study will therefore be : - To evaluate the potential benefit of left atrial appendage closure on the number of episodes of hematuria. - To evaluate the economic benefit in reducing the number of hospitalizations, surgeries and complications for hematuria as well as the discontinuation of anticoagulants. As the patient's data must be retrieved regardless of the patient's subsequent management (with or without a cardiac procedure) within the framework of the HEMOCC protocol, it will be proposed to the patient as soon as he or she is consulting for haematuria on radiation cystitis. The patient will be followed for 3 years. The mainly descriptive analyses will be collected in the form of a register and carried out by a biostatistician from Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital.