View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:This study is an observational study designed to determine the extent of gastrointestinal (GI) post-procedure complications after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation (RFCA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This exploratory study will evaluate patient symptoms prior to the RFCA procedure, at 1 month post RFCA procedure, and at 3 months post RFCA procedure, through the administration of a questionnaire. The purpose of this study is to determine if vagus nerve injury resulting from RFCA for AF increases the risk of post-procedure GI complications that may present as temporary or permanent symptoms.
This is a retrospective observational study to describe the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of patients diagnosed with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at risk of stroke or systemic embolism, who at least three months ago changed their anticoagulant therapy, due to any clinical situation, and are currently on treatment with a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC)
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In previous experimental studies, the investigators found that low-level vagus nerve (VN) stimulation (LLVNS), at voltages substantially below that which slowed the sinus rate, significantly suppressed AF inducibility and decreased AF duration. The investigators subsequently developed a non-invasive neuromodulatory therapy, in which LLVNS was delivered to the auricular branch of the VN located at the tragus, the anterior protuberance of the outer canine ear (low level tragus stimulation; LLTS). The anti-arrhythmic effects of LLTS were similar to those of LLVNS delivered to the cervical VN trunk. More recently, in a proof-of-concept study in humans, the investigators showed that in patients with drug-refractory AF undergoing AF ablation, LLTS for just one hour significantly shortened the AF duration and decreased inflammatory cytokines. The overall objective of this proposal is to translate in ambulatory patients with paroxysmal AF the results of previous studies showing acute suppression of AF and inflammation in anesthetized canines as well as humans, in order to examine the long-term therapeutic effects of this approach. The investigators hypothesize that intermittent (1 hour daily) LLTS for 6 months may result in long-term decrease of AF burden and suppression inflammatory cytokines in patients with paroxysmal AF. Patients will be randomized to either active or sham LLTS. LLTS will be delivered through a transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device for 1 hour daily over a 6-month period. AF burden will be defined as the percent of time spent in AF over a 2-week period, assessed by noninvasive continuous ECG monitoring at baseline and at 6 months. In addition, blood samples will be collected from patients at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months, for cytokine measurement. These investigations will establish the first evidence of the long-term effects of LLTS on AF suppression in patients with paroxysmal AF and may provide the basis for a potential expansion of the therapeutic targets of this treatment modality beyond AF.
The purpose of this study was to collect data on the prevalence and clinical significance of elevated cardiac troponin in a large registry of unselected patients with atrial fibrillation presenting to an emergency department.
This study is designed to prove new methods to enable the automated analysis of esophageal electrocardiography (eECG) signals in long-term measurements as well as the detection of atrial fibrillation. The investigators hypothesis is that eECG signals allow the reliable atrial and ventricular ECG signal distinction and the detection of atrial fibrillation. Therefore 14 patients with arrhythmias and 6 cardiac healthy subjects are asked to take part in this study. On each subject an esophageal ECG and a simultaneous standard surface ECG will be taken for about half an hour. Patient undergoing a cardiac catheter ablation during their current hospitalization will be further asked to allow access to the invasively obtained measurements (i.e. atrial potential map) to further improve the understanding of the eECG signals.
The objectives of this study are to establish the bioequivalence between rivaroxaban tablet 15 mg and rivaroxaban granule formulation 15 mg, and to assess the safety and tolerability of rivaroxaban 15 mg in healthy adult male subjects.
The objectives of this study are to establish the bioequivalence between rivaroxaban tablet 10mg and rivaroxaban granule formulation 10mg, and to assess the safety and tolerability of rivaroxaban 10mg in healthy adult male subjects.
Specific Aim: This prospective randomized study aims to compare the impact of three different catheter ablation approaches on long-term procedure outcome in terms of arrhythmia recurrence in persistent (PeAF) and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) patients. The three strategies to be evaluated are 1) ablation at sources guided by FIRMap (using RhythmViewâ„¢ Workstation from TOPERA), 2) ablation at sources guided by FIRMap + conventional pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) and 3) Extended PVAI plus ablation of non-PV triggers and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE).
This proposal is aiming at modifying and improving persistent AF management guidelines by evaluating targeting DE-MRI detected atrial fibrosis during AF ablation and its related effect on procedural outcome. OBJECTIVES: Primary Objective: To examine the efficacy of targeting atrial fibrosis tissue during an ablation procedure in treating persistent AF. Results from the DECAAF study show that one of the most important predictors of ablation outcome was the degree of ablation of the fibrotic tissue; the more fibrotic tissue that was overlapped with scar during ablation, the better the outcome. These results were the impetus for the primary outcome of DECAAF II. Patients will be randomized to receive conventional pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation or PVI + fibrosis-guided ablation. The investigators will follow patients longitudinally to assess the primary outcome identified as recurrence of persistent atrial arrhythmias (AA) (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia as defined by recent guidelines [2]). The investigators hypothesize that patients receiving fibrosis-guided ablation in addition to conventional PVI ablation will have fewer AA recurrences than those who receive PVI ablation alone. The investigators will also examine the efficacy of the fibrosis-guided ablation intervention on a number of secondary or exploratory outcomes including the individual components of the primary outcome (atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia), symptomatic atrial arrhythmia, AF cycle length/regularity/termination, cardiovascular (CV)-related hospitalization, CV-related mortality, quality of life measurements (University of Toronto Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS), and AF burden. The safety of the two interventions will be evaluated by evaluating peri-procedural complications including stroke, peripheral vascular stenosis, bleeding, esophageal injury, cardiac perforation, heart failure, and death.
Comparison of (i) catheter ablation, (ii) electrical cardioversion and (iii) pacemaker implantation with AV node ablation for patients over 65 years of age with persistent Atrial Fibrillation.