View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is still considered the cornerstone of catheter ablation for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). However, ablation outcomes in patients with persistent AF are suboptimal with high recurrence rates after a single PVI procedure. Recently, the investigators developed a new strategy, which enables precise identification of the driver regions allegedly responsible for the maintenance of persistent AF outside the pulmonary veins. This approach uses a conventional electroanatomical mapping system and novel single-signal algorithms based on automatic and accurate analysis of the instantaneous amplitude and frequency modulations displayed by atrial signals during AF (iAM and iFM, respectively) to locate the spatiotemporally stable regions that drive persistent AF (leading drivers). This strategy also enables to identify highly complex substrates in which targeting leading driver regions with catheter-based ablation may not be feasible or could be potentially associated with a significantly higher risk of complications. In such patients, the iAM/iFM maps obtained in the index catheter mapping and ablation procedure will be used to guide an additional patient-specific, minimally invasive surgical ablation approach via thoracoscopy, aiming to completely but specifically target all leading driver regions. The main objective of the TAILOR-AF study is to identify (via iAM/iFM maps), target and ablate AF leading drivers in patients with symptomatic persistent AF recurrences despite ≥2 previous PVI procedures. The methods include a percutaneous catheter mapping and ablation approach followed by a minimally invasive surgical approach via thoracoscopy, if necessary. As a secondary objective we will study the association of underlying blood biomarkers, atrial imaging and surface ECG parameters, with advanced remodeling stages requiring a surgical approach to target leading driver regions. This is a single center study (Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain) that will recruit 25 patients with symptomatic persistent AF episodes despite having been submitted to ≥2 PVI prior procedures. All patients will undergo subcutaneous implantable loop recorder (ILR) implantation to address AF burden 1 month before the ablation procedure and at least 1 year after the ablation procedure. The primary outcome of the study will be AF freedom after one year of follow-up off antiarrhythmic drugs.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) patients suffer a high symptom burden and reduced quality of life (QoL), high hospitalization rates and few effective treatment options. They have a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors and events. Lifestyle changes and exercise is a cornerstone of management in most chronic cardiac conditions and holds promise in AF, but the evidence is sparse and specific guidelines for exercise do not exist for AF patients. NEXAF is a large-scale multicenter randomized trial to determine the feasibility and effects of exercise on patient-reported and clinical outcomes. All patients will undergo continuous rhythm monitoring, enabling assessment of duration, frequency and total time of AF episodes. The overall aim of the study is to provide documentation for clinical exercise recommendations in AF. The objectives are to examine the effects of a 1-year exercise intervention in AF patients on (i) QoL and symptom burden, (ii) time-in-AF, and peak oxygen uptake, cardiac structure and function, cardiovascular risk factors and use of healthcare resources.
The purpose of this study is to provide clinical data pertaining to the safety and performance of the Globe Mapping and Pulsed Field Ablation System for treating subjects with atrial fibrillation (AF).
Precise identification of the atrial fibrosis is essential for successful catheter ablation of atrial arrhythmias in patients with atrial fibrillation. Voltage mapping of endocardial electrograms is currently used to delineate the anatomical substrate, but this is influenced by the direction of the activation wave front and is limited by the patient-specific thresholds. Mapping of local myocardial electrical impedance may overcome these limitations.
The investigators will screen consecutive patients presenting to the atrial fibrillation clinic for sleep apnea using a FDA-approved home sleep testing device, WatchPAT to determine prevalence of sleep apnea in a clinic-based sample.
Every day, doctors and nurses make hundreds of decisions about treatments - like when to start or stop them, or how frequently to give them. Ideally, decisions are based on gold standard evidence from Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs). Unfortunately, for many treatments little or no evidence exists and clinicians must use knowledge and experience to decide what is best. As clinicians are all different, this leads to random variation in how treatments are given to patients. For example, magnesium is routinely given in intensive care to prevent abnormal heart rhythms. There is little evidence supporting this, and clinicians vary in how they administer magnesium. Traditional RCTs might be used to examine whether more magnesium is better than less magnesium, but this method is inefficient and expensive for investigating multiple comparative treatment questions. Clinical trials are becoming more efficient by using existing hospital computer systems to run them. However, research teams continue to perform tasks like randomisation manually. For questions like magnesium supplementation, which occur daily, this is labour intensive and infeasible. Hospital computer systems also possess mechanisms for prompting and alerting clinicians for particular decisions, reminding them of best practices, warning them of potential problems. These systems may be modified to allow clinicians to randomise patients, under specific conditions. The investigators propose to assess whether modified computer prompts can be used to highlight the magnesium supplementation decision to clinicians. These would prompt the clinician to evaluate the uncertainty around giving or withholding magnesium in that instance. If in agreement that the optimal decision is unclear, clinicians can choose to randomise the patient within a predetermined trial structure. If the clinician knows better, they may override the prompt and continue with their preference. In both cases, the system learns from the decision and the patient receives optimal care determined by their clinician.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and has a rising prevalence due to an aging population. AF increases the patient's risk of hospitalization, heart failure and stroke and results into deterioration of quality of life. Treatment of symptomatic AF consists of either antiarrhythmic medication or a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) catheter ablation. However, lots of patients experience recurrence of AF in the first year after PVI. Previous studies showed that PVI outcomes depend on the presence of different treatable risk factors that influence the substrate for AF. Those risk factors include obesity, hypertension, cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, alcohol use, smoking and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. However, research into the effect of treatment of those risk factors mainly consists of observational studies. Currently, it is not clear to what extent patients will benefit from comprehensive risk factor treatment prior to PVI in terms of ablation success and quality of life. The aim of the current randomized controlled trial is to determine the effect of a nurse-led, technology-supported, personalized care pathway on hospital admissions for cardioversions and re-ablation in patients with AF that are referred for ablation. Patients included in this study will be randomized to either the intervention group receiving the comprehensive risk treatment before PVI or the control group receiving standard usual care. Patients in the intervention group will visit the specialized AF nurse outpatient clinic and receive a personalized treatment plan (with a maximal duration of 6 months) including lifestyle interventions and medication. This includes sleep apnea screening with a Home Sleep Apnea Test (WatchPAT). Patients will also use the VitalHealth Engage platform. The digital platform can be used at home to report AF complaints, send home measurement and complete questionnaires. Furthermore, it supports the nurse in administering effective lifestyle changes by offering the patient personalized content and education. Both study groups will be followed up to 12 months after ablation, during which hospital admissions for cardioversion and re-ablation are evaluated. At baseline, AFEQT, EQ5D and TBQ quality of life questionnaires will be performed. The questionnaires will be repeated prior to ablation, at 3 and 12 months after ablation. At baseline, pre-ablation and after 12 months laboratory tests (such as cholesterol) will be performed to evaluate adherence to lifestyle interventions.
This prospective nationwide registry aims to assess the durability of left atrial appendage occlusion when performed via totally thoracoscopic, percutaneous and hybrid- minimally invasive approaches and collect information on possible adverse events.
This open, multicenter, prospective, singel-arm study will evaluate usability and feasibility of a wearable stroke indication system (Stroke Alarm) in patients with recent TIA, recent minor stroke without persistent arm motor deficit, or atrial fibrillation up to 1 month.
A prospective, single-arm, single-center study to evaluate the safety, performance, and effectiveness of the SpherePVI™ Catheter for treating paroxysmal AF.