View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:EASThigh-AFNET 11 is an international, prospective, randomized, open, blinded endpoint assessment, multicenter trial (Treatment Strategy trial). The objective of EASThigh-AFNET 11 is to investigate whether early atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and a high comorbidity burden (CHA2DS2-VASc ≥4) reduces cardiovascular events (stroke, cardiovascular death, or heart failure events) compared to usual care.
The aim of this study is to test the efficacy of the CE-marked wearable system Stroke Alarm to identify the onset of a stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset. This is a multicenter, prospective observational single-arm trial with a registry-based propensity matched control population. A total of 500 patients will be included in the trial. An interim analysis will determine if the stroke onset frequency is sufficient to determine the main outcome. Should the number of stroke events differ from what is expected at interim analysis, study enrollment will continue to increase cohort size. Patients who meet the criteria for participation will, after signing consent, be included and receive the Stroke Alarm bracelets that are used for 3 months. Study data will be collected as baseline at inclusion, at follow-up 3 months after inclusion and by using national Swedish registry data after completion of the study. Patients with elevated stroke risk according assessed by presence of specific criteria associated with elevated risk caused by: 1. recent TIA, OR 2. recent stroke without persisting arm motor deficit, OR 3. atrial fibrillation A control population matched for age, sex, NIHSS score and health care region will be identified in the Swedish national stroke registry, Riksstroke, and used for comparison. The combined efficacy goal is at least 60% sensitivity for Stroke Alarm b of stroke with unilateral arm motor deficit within 3 hours of onset (with a 95% confidence interval above 30%) and a specificity of at least 80% using a clinical stroke diagnosis as gold standard.
This study explores the relationship between myocardial fibrosis and patient outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation (AF), specifically after catheter ablation. It aims to use Cardiac CT, an accessible tool, to measure left ventricular extracellular volume (ECV) as an indicator of fibrosis. The study will assess if higher ECV levels correlate with increased risks of AF recurrence, hospitalization, and poor cardiac function recovery. Positive findings could make ECV a key factor in deciding AF treatment strategies.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an irregular heartbeat that can cause symptoms of skipped beats, shortness of breath, stroke, or in some cases fluid in the lungs or legs. Treating AF is mostly to do with slowing the heart rate down so that the heart can get a chance to regain some energy. In some cases, slowing the heart rate is not easy to achieve as some elderly patients find it difficult to tolerate medications and suffer the side effects of such treatments. In those instances, there might be a possibility to permanently control the heart rate by implanting a pacemaker in the heart and intentionally damaging a regulatory region of the heart called the atrioventricular (AV) node. Damaging the AV node by a procedure called ablation results in the AF not being able to influence the bottom chambers (the ventricles) resulting in a slow rhythm. Therefore, if a pacemaker is implanted then the heart rate can be completely regulated by the pacemaker. A complex pacemaker that stimulates both the right and left ventricles simultaneously (BiVP) has been used for the last decade prior to AV node ablation. More recently, a technique has been designed to reduce the number of leads in the heart, reduce procedure time and have a similar effect on the heart called Conduction System Pacing (CSP). However, this has not been directly compared to BiVP in a robust randomized control trial. There is also not enough existing evidence to show that a pace and ablate strategy is superior to optimal medical therapy. We intend to compare the efficacy of BiVP to CSP in patients who undergo AV node ablation for treating AF, in addition to comparing both pace and ablate methods to pharmacological therapy.
The objective of the study is to compile real-world data on the use of the VERAFEYE System in standard of care atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures and left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) procedures. Results from this study will be used to guide development of the VERAFEYE System.
In this study we investigate the correlation between RDW and POAF, as we use the RDW as a predictor for inflammation for prediction of POAF
This study is an open-label Phase Ib clinical study with the primary objective of evaluating the safety and tolerability of multiple subcutaneous injections of SHR-2004 injection in patients with atrial fibrillation, and the secondary objective is to evaluate its pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and immunogenicity characteristics.
INTRODUCTION: The study focuses on comparing the effectiveness of oral Bisoprolol, a beta-1 adrenergic receptor blocker, against intravenous Diltiazem, a calcium channel blocker, in treating rapid atrial fibrillation or flutter with rapid ventricular response in an emergency setting. This research aims to fill the gap in empirical evidence regarding the use of oral Bisoprolol for these conditions, potentially offering a convenient, evidence-based alternative for patient management in emergency departments where established protocols are lacking. METHOD: This study is a randomized controlled trial targeting patients who present to the emergency room with symptomatic atrial fibrillation or flutter and rapid ventricular response requiring intervention. Participants will be split into two groups and undergo continuous monitoring of vital signs and regular electrocardiograms to ensure safety and document any adverse effects. The primary focus is on patient safety while evaluating the efficacy of the treatments. AIM: Evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral bisoprolol in treating atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response in an emergency department setting. PRIMARY OJECTIVES: The primary efficacy outcome will be evaluated by achieving a HR<110 beats per minute or a decrease ≥20% of baseline HR at 60 minutes. The primary safety outcome measures are HR < 60 bpm and SBP < 95 mm Hg. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: The use of Rescue medication, proportion of patients who required hospitalization, worsening of heart failure or pulmonary oedema, side effect of medication ( dizziness, headaches, gastrointestinal symptoms) PATEINT POPULATION: Adults (18 and older) presenting to the emergency department at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital with symptomatic atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response requiring treatment. INTERVENTION: A single oral dose of 5 mg Bisoprolol (maximum dose of 5 mg) or a single intravenous dose of Diltiazem at 0.25 mg/kg (to a maximum dose of 30 mg). CLINICAL MEASURMENT: Heart rate recorded every 15 minutes up to the 90-minute mark, with a 12-lead ECG performed every 30 minutes. OUTCOME: For therapy to be considered effective, patients must achieve a ventricular rate ≤110/min or experience a drop-in ventricular rate of at least 20% at 60 minutes.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare in atrial fibrillation patient with rapid ventricular response. The main question it aims to answer are Effectiveness of Repeated Amiodarone dosing regimen versus standard dosing regimen in Atrial fibrillation patient with rapid ventricular response Participants will receive Amiodarone iv treatment with different regimen - Repeated dosing regimen - Standard dosing regimen
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major health problem, with a prevalence of 0.4-1% of the population. It results in high healthcare costs and significant morbidity, especially for patients with severe symptoms. The RASTA-AF randomized control trial (RCT) is designed to answer the following question: does vigorous treatment of AF with aggressive risk factor management plus catheter ablation reduce AF-related outcomes as compared to catheter ablation plus usual care in patients with symptomatic AF and risk factors that promote AF. This study is a multicenter, prospective cohort study that will enrol patients who decline participation in the RASTA-AF RCT but agree to be followed in a registry. The objective of RASTA-Cohort is to determine whether patients who decline participation in the RASTA-AF RCT have different clinical characteristics and quality of life than patients who accept participation in the study, and whether they suffer from worse AF-related outcomes than patients in the RCT.