View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:The goal of this interventional clinical trial is compare between two different dose regimens of bisoprolol (beta-blocker) in CABG patients in terms of efficacy and safety.
In patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), current clinical guidelines recommend ablation for rhythm control. While percutaneous ablation has good results in patients with paroxysmal AF, it is not clear which is the best technique in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF. Our group performed the first randomized study of thoracoscopic epicardial ablation vs. endocardial catheter ablation (FAST Trial), which showed better results for epicardial ablation but with a higher rate of complications. Hybrid epicardial and endocardial ablation strategies have recently been described sequentially, showing better results in patients with persistent AF, but 40% of patients are still refractory to ablation. Our study aims to compare the conventional strategy (catheter ablation) with partial electrical isolation of the left atrium endo-epicardially (pulmonary veins, posterior wall and left atrial appendage) in a single procedure in the group of patients most refractory to ablation. Likewise, using magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography to analyze the atrial remodeling factors that can predict the success and failure of both therapies. Methodology: A 1:1 randomized clinical trial in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF in two groups: conventional ablation vs. partial endo-epicardial isolation. Prior to ablation, cardioversion will be performed and functionality and atrial size will be verified by echocardiography and delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will detect the degree of fibrosis and atrial remodeling. During the ablation procedure, a continuous rhythm recording device will be implanted. Likewise, at three months the MRI will be repeated to detect post-ablation fibrosis. At six months the echocardiography will be performed to assess atrial function and size. Main Expected Results: The expected results include: 1. an improvement in the rate of patients with no atrial arrhythmias recurrence in patients undergoing endo-epicardial ablation; 2. a lower AF burden in patients undergoing endo-epicardial ablation who have had recurrence; 3. To know the degree of atrial fibrosis associated with the success/failure of each technique; 4. To know the degree of fibrosis that both techniques produce; 5. To know the degree of ventricular function associated with the success/failure of each technique; 6. To know the degree of potentially lost atrial function; 7. To Compare the safety of both techniques
The purpose of this randomized, double blind, non-inferiority clinical trial was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of antazoline with propafenone in the rapid conversion of paroxysmal non-valvular atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm in patients without heart failure
The goal of this prospective-enrolling cohort study is to test and observe the effect of an integrated multi-discipline care program in patients with atrial fibrillation. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. to understand the baseline characteristics and to explore the occult risk factors of the patients with AF; 2. to monitor the treatment efficacy of the patients undergoing integrated care and potentially concur the clinical obstacles that prevent the best care for patients with AF. Participants will be treated by an integrated multi-discipline team that led by an electro-physiologist.
The study is planned as a single-blind, multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Sixty sbjects will be randomized 1:1 to either: (i) EP study + PFA, or (ii) EP study + Sham ablation control. After informed consent is obtained, an implantable loop recorder (ILR) will be implanted within seven days, and an EP study will be scheduled for 30±5 days after ILR implantation. Patients in both groups will first undergo an EP study to rule out a concealed AV bypass tract and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Patients will not be randomized if SVT or concealed AV bypass tract is found during the EP study. Once an SVT or bypass tract is excluded, randomization will be performed. Patients randomized to Ablation will undergo PVI using the commercially-available pentaspline PFA catheter (Farawave, Farapulse-BSCI Inc). Patients randomized to the Sham-ablation Control group will simply undergo approximately 20-30 min of anesthesia with propofol and benzodiazepines in a similar manner as patients in the ablation arm. Primary endpoints will be assessed six months after the procedure. ECGs will be monitored using implantable ECG monitors (ILR) in all patients. There will be two co-primary endpoints (assessed at six months or at cross-over if Early Exit): 1. Freedom from recurrent AF/AT/AFL (post 2-month blanking), assessed as time-to first recurrence; 2. Quality of life according to Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy of life (AFEQT) score at 6 months (or at cross-over if Early Exit).
This study intends to collect blood samples of adult healthy subjects, elderly healthy subjects and elderly patients with atrial fibrillation after taking dabigatran etexilate for pharmacokinetics and other studies, aiming to reveal the effect of dabigatran etexilate in Chinese elderly population. Pharmacokinetic profile and biomarker concentration levels; fecal samples were collected for gut microbiota studies to further explore potential mechanisms. The results of the study may provide reference for the precision medicine of dabigatran etexilate and other drugs in the elderly population or the development of new clinical drugs.
Concomitant ablation is an effective treatment for patients with various types of atrial fibrillation undergoing heart surgery. However, recurrences of tachycardias after concomitant ablation can happen and seem to be mostly related to reentry mechanism resulting in atrial tachycardias. The aim of the study is to perform invasive re-mapping of ablated regions in the atria to assess durability of ablation lesions and prevalence of conduction gaps that can be targets for additional ablation to lower longterm arrhythmia recurrence.
A study to evaluate the effect of abelacimab relative to placebo on the rate of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism (SE) in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) who have been deemed by their responsible physicians or by their own decision to be unsuitable for oral anticoagulation therapy.
The Impulse Dynamics Optimizer Device is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved; commercially available device indicated for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Many candidates of this device have a previously implanted cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)- internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or permanent pacemaker (PM). Patients with heart failure are at high risk for both atrial and ventricular cardiac arrhythmias. The aim of this study is to evaluate patients for Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden episode data obtained from interrogation of their CIED 8 months or greater after Optimizer implant and compare arrhythmia burden 6 months before Optimizer Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) device insertion to 8 months or greater after Optimizer insertion (after 2 month blanking period).
Determine echocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence post radiofrequency Ablation and evaluate markers of low voltage areas on 3D mapping.