View clinical trials related to Atrial Fibrillation.
Filter by:This study aims to evaluate the use of rivaroxaban and its short term safety when used by patients for the new indications of prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) and prevention of recurrent DVT and PE. Any adult patient started by their care team on rivaroxaban or an alternative anticoagulant for the specified indications during the study period will be eligible to take part. A questionnaire will be completed by the care team of each patient at the start of treatment and again 12 weeks later. The care team will complete the questionnaires using information from the patient's medical notes, not by asking the patient directly. If a participant has an adverse event during the 12 week period, we may ask the patient's care team to fill out a further follow up questionnaire. No other examinations or tests will be performed. Patients will only be recruited to the study after the clinical decision to prescribe rivaroxaban or an alternative anticoagulant has been made, so that prescribing behaviour is not altered by the study. It is an observational, non-interventional study covering the whole of England and Wales.
Ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) using pulmonary vein isolation is employed when patients do not respond favorably to medical therapy. Successful procedures are accomplished in the majority of patients, but the outcome after many years of follow-up after ablation is unknown.
This propsective study aims to compare the diagnostic yield of a Personal Heart Rhythm Monitor (PHRM) with an automated cardiac event recorder (ACER) to detect paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation PAF). The investigators hypothesise that the PHRM, used intermittently for 3 months, will detect significantly more cases of PAF than the ACER, used continuously for one week. A case-control sub-study will identify individuals with confirmed PAF, and matched individuals with no evidence of PAF, to identify potential serum biomarkers for PAF. A further case-control study will assess markers of left atrial function in patients with PAF and their matched controls. Another case-control sub-study will determine the significance of frequent Atrial Premature Beats (APBs) in the development of AF over a one year period.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and its prevalence increases with aging of the population. It is reflected in the ECG recording by the replacement of regular P-waves by an undulating baseline and irregular ventricular complexes [2]. The uncoordinated atrial activity prevents effective atrial contraction, leading to clot formation. Atrial fibrillation contributes significantly to population morbidity and mortality, and presently available therapeutic approaches have major limitations, including limited efficacy and potentially serious side effects. It can be classified into one of the three following categories: 1. Paroxysmal: self-termination within 7 days 2. Persistent: requires termination by pharmacological or direct-current electric cardioversion 3. Permanent: restoration to sinus rhythm is impossible or inadvisable It is believed that in many cases the natural history of AF involves evolution from paroxysmal to persistent to permanent forms through the influence of atrial remodeling caused by the arrhythmia itself and/or progression of underlying heart disease. As many underlying conditions contribute to the development and progression of AF, the full and exact mechanisms standing behind this common arrhythmia are not completely or sufficiently understood. Thromboembolism is by far the most important complication of AF, and the most common factor in stroke in the elderly. The determinants of Virchow triad, including stasis, endothelial damage, and coagulation properties, are centrally involved in AF- related thrombus formation. Hence, thorough searching for new possible causes or contributing factors for the developing and progression of AF and its most threatening complication, thromboembolism, is mandatory The aim of the study is to look for new possible causes of atrial fibrillation and its complications.
Aim of the study is to compare the safety and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the endoscopic ablation system in comparison to irrigated radiofrequency current ablation in patients with drug-refractory persistent atrial fibrillation.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cause of cardioembolism and a leading cause of ischemic stroke. The diagnosis of AF after cerebral ischemia is difficult to establish even during the treatment at specialised stroke units, as paroxysmal episodes may terminate spontaneously before arrival at the hospital and do not always show early recurrence. However, the diagnosis of AF is of particular clinical relevance since adaequate anticoagulation is one of the most effective secondary preventive treatments in stroke. The detection rate of AF after stroke increases progressively by extending the duration and intensity of cardiac monitoring. For this purpose innovative medical devices and implantable event recorders have been suggested. However, high socioeconomic expenses, malcompliance and the invasiveness of some of these approaches currently limit their use to a minority of affected patients, while the growing number of stroke survivors is lacking access to free and simple screening tools. For primary prevention, the measurement of the peripheral pulse (MPP) is currently the only guideline-recommended screening method among individuals aged 65 years or older. In contrast, MPP has never been applied in the setting of secondary stroke prevention, probably because several factors were expected to interfere with this simple technique, including sensomotor and neuropsychiologic handicaps of stroke patients 18. This study investigates feasibility and validity of MPP in this cohort (pilot phase) and compares daily MPP for 6 months with repeated holter-ECG in patients after ischemic stroke.
To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of DU-176b administered to non-valvular atrial fibrillation patients with severe renal impairment, compared with DU-176b administered to non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with normal renal function or mild renal impairment (Normal/MiRI).
Many drug interactions with Warfarin are well documented in the literature, including interactions with a variety of antibiotics. However,in mamy cases it is difficult to predict when the interaction remains theoretical and when it becomes clinically significant and will be reflected in the individual patient. This study's aim is to identify and characterize related conditions (including comorbidities, laboratory test results and other parameters related to the patient)that might be predictors for drug interactions turning from theoretical to clinically significant.
This is an international observational multicentre study to be conducted in Germany, Spain, Italy and USA. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the relative effectiveness of dronedarone in real world clinical practice versus other anti-arrhythmic agents of interest. The design of the study is a historic-prospective cohort with dynamic exposure and stratified competitive recruitment with balanced comparison groups of dronedarone versus alternative antiarrhythmic drugs of interest.
The objective of this NIS is to assess in a real-life setting, usage patterns and associated outcomes in the management (healthcare resource utilisation and associated costs) of patients with non-valvular AF treated with Xarelto, in accordance with the terms of the European marketing authorization and the Belgian reimbursement criteria.