Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02009930
Other study ID # FDG20130024H
Secondary ID
Status Terminated
Phase
First received
Last updated
Start date November 5, 2013
Est. completion date July 18, 2018

Study information

Verified date May 2020
Source David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Observational

Clinical Trial Summary

Hypothesis: Enlisted military members with 10 or more years of service and at least one cardiovascular risk factor will demonstrate a higher risk of future cardiac events as assessed by coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring than the risk calculated by the Framingham Risk Score.


Description:

While the military is making strides towards improving the health and habits of service members, there are many aspects of the military culture that negatively affect the cardiovascular health of military members. Smoking/tobacco use, poor eating habits with Meals Ready-to-eat (MRE) and ready access to fast food establishments on base, inconsistent exercise, the socioeconomic status of enlisted members and the stress of deployment are all factors that contribute to increased risk of cardiovascular disease during military service. Currently the calculation of a patient's Framingham risk score is the most commonly used method of calculating a patient's cardiovascular risk, and this calculation is based on age, smoking history, blood pressure, and lab values and compares it to a general population's risk. By the use of a cardiac computerized topography (CT) scan, a Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) score can be calculated and used to estimate the degree of atherosclerosis already present in each patient's coronary arteries, and thus establishing their risk of future cardiovascular events. CAC scoring is a more patient-specific way of identifying cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence of atherosclerosis in enlisted military members with at least 10 years of service and one or more cardiovascular risk factor and to determine if their risk of a cardiovascular event is higher than predicted by the Framingham score. If CAC scoring is demonstrated to be more accurate, particularly if it is more likely to detect risk, it may be used in the future to better risk stratify this population of the military. The CAC results in patients could also be a motivating factor to create changes in the military culture to attempt to mitigate these risks and create a healthier fighting force.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Terminated
Enrollment 112
Est. completion date July 18, 2018
Est. primary completion date July 18, 2018
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 35 Years and older
Eligibility INCLUSION Criteria:

Active Duty Military Members with at least 10 years of service

Enlisted Rank

Males 35 years and older OR Females 45 years and older (please note the age difference is due to the fact that female plaque formation with calcification has been shown to lag that of males by about 10 years)

One or More of the Following Risk Factors:

Smoker - at least 5 pack years in the past 5 years (pack year = number of packs per day number of years of smoking)

Diabetic (Fasting glucose of >125 mg/dL on two or more blood draws, or Random Blood Glucose of >200 mg/dL on a single blood draw, or Hemoglobin A1C >6.5%, or previous diagnosis of diabetes listed in the subject's medical record) or Pre-diabetic (Fasting glucose >100 on two or more blood draws or Hgb A1C 5.7-6.4)

Hypertension (Systolic BP > 140 or Diastolic BP >90 or on blood pressure medications or diagnosis of hypertension in medical record)

Waist Circumference > 40 inches for males or >35 inches for females

Hyperlipidemia (LDL>130, HDL<40 for males, HDL <50 for females, Triglycerides >200, on lipid lowering medications and/or diagnosis of hyperlipidemia in medical record)

EXCLUSION Criteria:

Males <35 years old

Women <45 years old (please note the age difference is due to the fact that female plaque formation with calcification has been shown to lag that of males by about 10 years)

Officer Rank - officers are excluded as we are looking at the enlisted culture in the military.

History of any of the following:

Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)

Myocardial Infarction (MI)

Percutaneous Intervention/Stent Placement (PCI)

Angina

Radiotherapy (external beam, brachytherapy, radiopharmaceutical)

Under the care of any of the following types of providers in the past 12 months (As these subjects are at greater risk of having had significant radiation exposure to the chest over the past 12 months):

Radiation/Medical Oncologist

Interventional Radiologist

Cardiologist

Cardiothoracic Surgeon

Vascular Surgeon

Females who think they may be pregnant

Pregnant females

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Locations

Country Name City State
United States David Grant USAF Medical Center Travis Air Force Base California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Prevalence of Atherosclerosis Percent of active duty enlisted military members with 10 or more years of military service determined to have a prevalence of atherosclerosis based on CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale), is derived from the CAC score (i.e., an estimate of the degree of atherosclerosis present in each participant's coronary arteries, reported as a number), and percentage by age to establish risk of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: Low risk = CAC of 0 and no cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, Low - Moderate risk = CAC of 0 with CV risk factors, Moderate - High risk: CAC 1-100 and percentile for age <75%, High risk = CAC 100-399 or percentile for age >75%, Very high risk = CAC >100 and percentile for age >90% or CAC >400". Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst. within 10 days of CT scan
Primary Rate of Reclassification Percent/Number of subject that were reclassified from FRS to CAC risk category using CAC scores. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Primary Compare FRS to the CAC - At Least One Additional Risk Factor Compare FRS risk category to CAC risk category for enlisted subjects with at least 10 years of service and at least one additional CV risk factor to determine how well the results correlate with one another using the Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary Metabolic Syndrome - Compare FRS to CAC Compare FRS category and CAC risk category for those meeting and not meeting criteria for metabolic syndrome. Calculate Fisher's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between the presence/absence of metabolic syndrome and the FRS and CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary Living in the Dorms - Compare FRS to CAC Compare FRS category to CAC risk category for those who lived in the dorms > 5 years and < 5 years. Calculate Fisher's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between those who lived in the dorms > 5 years and < 5 years and the FRS and CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary Physical Fitness (PT) Failures - Compare FRS to CAC Compare FRS category to CAC risk category for those with and without PT failures. Calculate Fischer's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between those with and without PT failures and the FRS and CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, total cholesterol level, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary Years of Military Service - Compare FRS to CAC Compare FRS category to CAC risk category for those with 10-14, 15-19, 20-24 and 25+ years of military service. Calculate Fisher's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between those with 10-14, 15-19, 20-24 and 25+ years of military service and FRS & CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary Additional Cardiovascular Risk Factors - Compare FRS to CAC Compare FRS category to CAC risk category for those with 1 risk factor (RF), vs 2 RF, vs 3 RF, vs 4 RF, vs 5 CV risk factors. Calculate Fisher's Exact test statistic and associated p values to look at the relationship between those with 1 RF, vs 2 RF, vs 3 RF, vs 4 RF, vs 5 CV RF and the FRS & CAC risk category. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. The Framingham risk category (scale) = FRS to estimate the risk of a CV event over the next 10 years. The FRS uses age, systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol levels, and smoking status to create a score that is converted into a 10-year CV disease risk % that correlates into a risk category: low, moderate, moderate - high risk, very high. For both scales, low is the best and very high is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary Metabolic Syndrome - CAC Compare CAC risk category between two groups, those that meet criteria for metabolic syndrome and those that do not, to see if there is an association between the groups and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary Living in the Doors - CAC Compare CAC risk category between two groups, those who lived in the dorm for > 5 years and < 5 years, to see if there is an association between the groups and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary PT Failures - CAC Compare CAC risk category between two groups, those with and without a PT failures, to see if there is an association between the groups and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary Years of Military Service - CAC Compare CAC risk category among groups, those with 10-14, 15-19, 20-24, and 25+ years of military service, to see if there is an association between overall years of military service and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
Secondary Additional Risk Factors - CAC Compare CAC risk category among groups, those with 1 risk factor (RF) vs. 2 RF, vs 3 RF, vs 4 RF, vs 5 RF (as listed in the inclusion criteria), to see if there is an association between the groups and CAC risk category. The number of participants in each risk category will be added. Then the total number for each group will be used to calculate the correlation using Fisher's Exact test and reported as a p value. The CAC risk category (scale) = CAC score (estimated degree of calcium in coronary arteries, a number) + percentage by age to establish risks of future CV events. There are 5 risk categories: low, low - moderate, moderate - high, very high. Low risk is the best outcome, and very high risk is the worst outcome within 10 days of CT scan
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05052918 - The Effect of Exercise and Metformin on Carotid Intima-media Thickness in Patients With Prediabetes N/A
Recruiting NCT04511234 - Sirolimus Coated Balloon Versus Standard Balloon for SFA and Popliteal Artery Disease N/A
Completed NCT05906797 - Impact of Non-surgical Periodontal Therapy in the Improvement of Early Endothelial Dysfunction in Subjects With Periodontitis. N/A
Completed NCT03273972 - INvestigating the Lowest Threshold of Vascular bENefits From LDL Lowering With a PCSK9 InhibiTor in healthY Volunteers N/A
Suspended NCT02932176 - Machine Learning for Handheld Vascular Studies
Recruiting NCT05158257 - Clinical Of Plain Balloon Dilatation Combined Stent Versus Endovascular Debulking Combined Drug-coated Balloon to Treat Arteriosclerosis Occlusive Disease of Lower Extremity N/A
Completed NCT01212900 - Randomized Trial of Imaging Versus Risk Factor-Based Therapy for Plaque Regression Phase 4
Completed NCT03697382 - Effect of Daily Steps on Fat Metabolism N/A
Recruiting NCT06230406 - T-Mem GEne in Atherosclerosis
Completed NCT03654313 - Single and Multiple Ascending Doses of MEDI6570 in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Phase 1
Completed NCT00382564 - Magnetic Resonance Angiography to Diagnose Atherosclerotic Disease N/A
Recruiting NCT02894931 - Effects of Dietary Interventions on Serum and Macrophage Atherogenicity N/A
Completed NCT02998918 - Effects of Short-term Curcumin and Multi-polyphenol Supplementation on the Anti-inflammatory Properties of HDL N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT02578355 - National Plaque Registry and Database N/A
Recruiting NCT02265250 - Pilot Study-Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Global Atherosclerosis Risk Assessment
Completed NCT02268513 - Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America (MASALA) Social Network Study
Completed NCT02224339 - New Technologies to Determine Carotid Plaque Vulnerability
Completed NCT03393377 - Preventive Arterial Wall Phenotype and Low-dose Fluvastatin/Valsartan Combination N/A
Completed NCT02377310 - Pd/Pa vs iFRâ„¢ in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography N/A
Completed NCT02116829 - Is There Room for Butter in a Healthy Diet? N/A