View clinical trials related to Asthma.
Filter by:This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study of mepolizumab in comparison with placebo in reducing Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) use in subjects with severe refractory asthma. The study consists of four phases, OCS Optimisation Phase (Week -8 to Week 0), and the double-blind treatment period divided into an Induction Phase (Week 0 to Week 4), OCS Reduction Phase (Week 5 upto Week 20) followed by Maintenance Phase (Week 20 to Week 24). During the Optimisation Phase the investigator will adjust the OCS (prednisone/prednisolone) dose according to the Optimisation titration schedule based on a review of Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-5 score and exacerbation. In the Induction Phase subjects will be randomized 1:1 (approximately 60 per arm) to receive either mepolizumab (100 mg) administered subcutaneously (SC) or placebo every 4 weeks in addition to their existing maintenance asthma therapy with the lowest dose of OCS from Optimisation Phase. The Induction Phase will allow sufficient time for those subjects randomised to the mepolizumab arm to achieve a decrease in the eosinophilic inflammation prior to the reduction in OCS. During the Reduction Phase, subjects will continue receiving 100 mg mepolizumab/placebo every 4 weeks and the OCS dose reduction will be done every 4 weeks using the reduction titration schedule based on a review of eDiary parameters recorded by the subject, the subjects' exacerbation history, and a review of the signs and symptoms of adrenal insufficiency. In the Maintenance Phase subjects will be maintained without any further OCS dose adjustment. Subjects who complete the 24 week double-blind period and meet the eligibility criteria, will be offered the opportunity to participate in an open label extension (OLE) study otherwise they will return for a Follow-up Visit 12 weeks after their last dose of double blind study treatment. At each clinic visit, adverse events, safety labs, spirometery parameters and exacerbations will be assessed. The pharmacokinetic samples will be collected in the beginning of the treatment, prior to last dose, at the end of study (exit visit) and the follow up.
The investigators hypothesize that there is a statistically significant decrease of Natriuretic Hormone Peptides (NHPs) in subjects with asthma exacerbation compared to levels following treatment of an exacerbation of asthma.
The study is designed to look at the safety, tolerability and efficacy of 2 different doses of the study drug (CHF6001, a PDE4 inhibitor) in asthmatics, when given by inhalation, once a day for 9 days. The efficacy will be evaluated by measuring the protective effect of CHF 6001 after an allergen challenge.
The Environmental Polymorphisms Registry (EPR) Health and Exposure Survey is designed to gather health, family history of disease, environmental exposures and lifestyle data on adult EPR subjects. The EPR is a registry established to collect and store DNA samples from 20,000 volunteers from North Carolina and to serve as a resource to scientist investigating genotype-driven translational research of chronic conditions. Under this new protocol, we will administer a health and exposures survey to all EPR subjects. The information collected in the survey will be used to better characterize the EPR population thus making it more useful to NIEHS researchers. The survey contains approximately 200 questions. Data from the survey will help researchers develop hypotheses, design follow-up studies, and select appropriate subjects. The survey will be administered to EPR subjects using a modified version of the Dillman Total Design Method (TDM) for surveys. This method requires following specific time-dependent steps for survey administration that incorporate both self- and phone administration and other types of phone and mail contact. The goal of TDM is to maximize subject response rates.
This is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, parallel-group study to determine the efficacy and safety of nebulized fluticasone propionate 1mg twice daily compared with oral prednisone administered for 7 days to Chinese pediatric and adolescent subjects (aged 4 to 16 years) with an acute exacerbation of asthma
This is a multicentre, randomized, single-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group phase III local registration study for a treatment period of 12 weeks. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of fluticasone propionate 1mg via nebulizer BID in treatment of Chinese adult and adolescent patients with severe persistent asthma for a treatment period of 12 weeks versus budesonide 2mg via nebulizer BID. The steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of fluticasone propionate inhalation solution will also be assessed.
This is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, stratified, parallel-group study with three active comparators in subjects with moderate to severe persistent asthma. The study consists of a run-in period of 4 weeks, followed by a treatment period of 12 weeks, and a follow up contact period of one week. The total duration of the study is 17 weeks. 990 subjects will be randomized to one of three treatments (FF/VI Inhalation Powder 200/25 mcg once daily in the evening; FF/VI Inhalation Powder 100/25 mcg once daily in the evening; FF 100 Inhalation Powder once daily in the evening) for 12 weeks. In addition, all subjects will be supplied albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol at Visit 1 to use as needed for acute asthma symptoms throughout the entire study. Subjects will attend four on-treatment visits at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 (Visits 4 through 7).
Ambrosia is known for its allergenicity in the USA causing hay fever and asthma. Israel has always been considered "clean" of Ambrosia but over the past years growth of Ambrosia plants has been detected in several locations in Israel. In the proposed study, patients referred for routine allergic evaluation will also be skin tested with Ambrosia allergens, in addition to their regular prick skin tests with all other airborne allergens.
Asthma is reported to affect between 3-14% of pregnancies making asthma medicines one of the most commonly used classes of medicines during pregnancy. Maternal asthma and in particular poorly controlled asthma has been found to be associated with a number of adverse perinatal outcomes including preterm delivery, low birth weight and pre-eclampsia. At present little is known about the safety in humans of many anti-asthma medicines when used during pregnancy. As a result all inhaled corticosteroids, with the exception of budesonide which is category B, have an FDA pregnancy category C, indicative of the fact there are no adequate and well controlled studies in humans. Fluticasone propionate is an inhaled corticosteroid used for the treatment of asthma, often in combination with the long-acting β-agonist salmeterol. Owing to small numbers of pregnancy exposures in the past, little is known about the safety of fluticasone propionate when used during pregnancy. A recent feasibility study, however, has shown that there are sufficient numbers of first trimester exposed pregnancies on the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) to allow the overall risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) to be evaluated. This study also demonstrated that using data from the GPRD it is possible to determine an individual's exposure to anti-asthma medicines during pregnancy and to classify her treatment in terms of the British Thoracic Society treatment steps based on linked prescription and primary care data. The aims of this study are to 1) evaluate the safety profile of fluticasone propionate (FP) compared with exposure to all other inhaled corticosteroids with all major congenital malformations combined as the primary endpoint, whilst taking into account potential confounders and exposure to other anti-asthma medicine; and 2) test the null hypothesis that exposure to fluticasone propionate during the first trimester of pregnancy is not associated with increased overall risk of all major congenital malformations when compared to the risk in those exposed to other inhaled corticosteroids during the first trimester of pregnancy. The study will be a retrospective cohort study and will use data from the United Kingdom's General Practice Research Database (GPRD). The GPRD contains longitudinal medical records collected within UK primary care. All medical symptoms and diagnoses are recorded in the database, including those relating to pregnancy, in the form of Read Codes. In addition to coded data GPs have the option of recording un-coded comments ('free text'), such as more detailed descriptions of diagnoses or treatments along with information provided to them via hospital letters, referrals and discharge summaries. As the recording of stillbirths, neonatal deaths and pre-term births on the GPRD has not been verified, a verification exercise will be carried out. This will involve requesting and reviewing free text comments for 100 stillbirths, 100 neonatal deaths and 100 pre-term births. Free text comments will be requested if they are associated with a medical code related to pregnancy, delivery, post natal visits, death, post mortem, hospital letters and other forms of communication. If the free text is not found to be informative we will send questionnaires to the woman's GP. All outcomes will be identified and verified blinded to asthma treatment and severity levels.
A pilot study to test the feasibility of a personalized asthma care intervention.