View clinical trials related to Asthma Chronic.
Filter by:Social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic could lead to clinical and functional deterioration of people living with chronic respiratory diseases (CRD). As they are considered risk group for COVID-19, it is not recommended that they leave their house and have interaction with people outside. Thus, most of them have not been attend Pulmonary Rehabilitation sections since the beginning of pandemic, neither exercising outdoor, experiencing drastic restrictions in their activities of daily living. It is well known that low level of physical activity in daily life (PADL) in this population is related to poor prognosis, including higher chance of hospitalization due to exacerbation and mortality. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the short- and mid-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the clinical, physical and functional conditions and the PADL level of people living with CRD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and interstitial lung diseases). Participants will be assessed during the social isolation period and they will be reassessed immediately after release from social isolation. Thus, the subjects will be followed-up during 12 months to record symptoms, functional status, quality of life, exacerbations and hospitalizations. The researchers' hypothesis is that those patients will present very low level of PADL in association to sedentarism, poor functional status, more symptoms of dyspnoea, anxiety and depression, poor sleep quality and, consequently, will present more episodes of acute exacerbation of the disease and more hospital admission during the study protocol.
Nowadays, the COVID-19 epidemic causes stress not only to healthy people but also to people with unhealthy conditions. Excess psychological stress (either in quality, quantity, frequency, and/or duration) could push susceptible individuals to ultimately develop clinical asthma. Depression was significantly associated with asthma interference with daily activities, breathlessness, night symptoms, use of bronchodilators, and poor compliance with medical treatment. Covid-19 pandemic induced the countries around the world to require from its citizens not to ask for health care support rather than in emergency situations and through utilizing telemedicine. This action aims to control spreading the infection with viruses as well as to reduce the workload on the healthcare providers. Although asthma is not listed as one of the chronic conditions that might complicate coronavirus infections, asthma people might have a high-stress level that might induce their asthma attack which consequentially reflects on their quality of life. People with asthma have a unique experience rather than people with other health conditions during COVID-19. Patients with asthma experience a lot of stressors that might induce asthma and impaired their HRQOL such as overuse of antiseptic substances, stay home with a sedentary lifestyle, the sudden shift to telemedicine, and electronic work from home. Also, as a result of the similarity of asthma symptoms with coronavirus symptoms, the patient might have a continuous sense of uncertainty that s/he is infected with the COVID-19 virus, and this suspicion can increase the psychological overburden on these patients. Therefore, all these stressors should be evaluated to recognize their health needs and the kind of social and health support that should be provided to them during the pandemic time. Also, Identifying the predictors of HRQOL among patients with asthma during the pandemic of COVID-19 is urgently required.
The first part will be a comparative cross-sectional study to identify the frequency of ILO and other comorbidites among participants with asthma compared to a group of reference subjects without asthma, matched for age- and gender and race. The second part will be a longitudinally observational study study following participants for one year after the cross-sectional study. The Maat-scores ILO-symptoms and asthma-outcomes longitudinally will be evaluated, .
Rationale: Despite the availability of effective treatment to reach symptom control, nearly half of the asthma patients remain inadequately controlled. There is a need for timely and appropriate treatment of patients with uncontrolled asthma. Improving asthma control could be achieved by a better identification of causes followed by remediating modifiable factors in primary care or referral to secondary care. However, major gaps in evidence-based asthma practice exist in primary care. So far, there is a lack of knowledge on the prevalence of inadequate asthma and associated characteristics. Objective: The primary objective is to determine the proportion of primary care patients with inadequate asthma control, as assessed during a regular control consultation with the general practice nurse. Study design: This is a non-interventional prospective observational study, taking place in a real-world primary care setting. The AsthmaOptimiser tool will be used during regular asthma consultations in primary care, which the healthcare provider will fill in together with the patient. The AsthmaOptimiser tool creates an overview of factors and characteristics that may be associated with uncontrolled asthma, and subsequently provides a guideline-based management suggestion. Additionally, we will perform qualitative interviews to collect experiences and perspectives of healthcare providers on their use of the AsthmaOptimiser tool, including, but not limited to, ease of use, points of improvement, and on their implementation of the management suggestions. Study population: Patients diagnosed with asthma, who attend a pre-planned primary care asthma review, are eligible to participate. A limited number of in- and exclusion criteria will be adopted, to make sure the research population closely resembles the real world. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with inadequate asthma control. Inadequate asthma control will be defined as an exacerbation in the past 4 weeks and/or an ACQ6 (i.e., Asthma Control Questionnaire) score >0.75.
The SECOND SOUFFLE survey focuses on aspects of care and quality of life in a period when the landscape of severe asthma is changing in the context of biotherapies. Moreover survey on care pathway and quality of life of the asthmatic severe population according to their phenotype have never been done. It is likely to bring results in a relatively fast time, results that can lead to guide the criteria collected in RAMSES a national severe asthma cohort and future research tracks of this cohort.
This study evaluated the efficacy of doxophylline as a steroid sparing treatment in Mexican children with asthma treated with medium ir high doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). It is a cross over study in which both groups of patients will receive doxophylline plus a lower steroid dose maintaining the same treatment step according to GINA guidelines, one group will maintain the same treatment dose while the other will start with doxophylline with the lower ICS dose, and by the middle of the study both groups will interchange treatment schemes.
A prospective, observational, interventional, single-blind study (blinded for a clinician in the field of inflammatory parameters). The aim of the study is evaluation of the usefulness of induced sputum eosinophilia and other inflammatory indices [exhaled nitric oxide (NO), exhaled breath temperature, bronchial hyperresponsiveness] in predicting the failure of treatment reduction with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in stable asthma in children and adolescents. In participants with a stable course of the asthma (confirmed in the run -in period), every 3 months the dose of ICS is halved (according to GINA guidelines) until the control is lost or the lowest daily ICS dose is reached (200 mcg, calculated as budesonide equivalent). Throughout the treatment reduction period, the participants run an observation card (clinical symptoms) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measurements. Clinical evaluation is performed every month, with spirometry, exhaled NO and exhaled breath temperature measurements. Before the reduction and then one month after the change of treatment, the hyperresponsiveness measurement is carried out with the sputum induction (combined method using hypertonic saline), and 2 months after the change of treatment with the exercise challenge test. In the case of loss of asthma control, beta-mimetic will be administered (temporarily) and return to dose of ICS before reduction or further increase of treatment is planned. In severe asthma exacerbations, oral steroids will be considered. The study is observational: treatment is modified according to GINA guidelines based on clinical data as part of routine medical care. Only difference compared do standard care is supplementary inflammation evaluation (exhaled NO, sputum eosinophilia, bronchial hyperreactivity).
The purpose of this study to determine whether the bacteria inside the lungs of people with asthma can be modified (changed) if they are given an antibiotic and if this change is associated with an improvement in asthma symptoms.
The primary goal of this proposal is to use an in-home, smartphone-enabled, hand-held spirometer to determine the FEV1% predicted ranges that predict the Yellow Zone threshold.
Since 2006 there was a plateau in world wide mortality from asthma. Overreliance in Short Acting Beta2 Agonists (SABA) was associated with increased risk of death from asthma. Long acting beta agonists (LABA) alone was not permitted as treatment for asthma as it was determined by FDA by the "black box". By contrast SABA does not have a "black box", despite similar overuse alerts associated with increased risk of death from asthma. the investigators want to know if exist asthmatic subjects that do use another rescue medication; not SABA, and to compare their features, Asthma Control Test (ACT), and lung function in a outpatient facility. First consecutive visits at outpatient Pulmonary Section of asthmatic subjects were described. Asthma Control Test (ACT) that was routinely used to assess asthma and spirometry were performed.