View clinical trials related to Arthritis, Psoriatic.
Filter by:Background.Recent epidemiologic studies have shown an association between psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Recently, measurement of fecal calprotectin (FC) demonstrated a good sensitivity and specificity for intestinal inflammation. Primary objective of present study was to evaluate the presence of occult bowel inflammation in patients with PsA as expressed by elevated levels of FC. Secondary objectives were to investigate the correlation between the levels FC and clinical and laboratory features, and the outcome of CF-positive patients in terms of IBD development.
This study [4827-005 (post market)] is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of long-term exposure to brodalumab in subjects with plaque psoriasis (psoriasis vulgaris, psoriatic arthritis) who have completed Study 4827-003 (Study 003) and in subjects with pustular psoriasis (generalized) or psoriatic erythroderma who have completed the Study 4827-004 (Study 004). 4827-005 study was conducted as phase 3 clinical trial until July 4th 2016 (approval date in Japan). After that date 4827-005 study was switched to phase 4 study.
The purpose of this study is to learn whether changing diet impacts psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI). Using coronary computer tomography angiogram (CCTA), it is found that a significantly higher prevalence of high-risk coronary plaque (non-calcified plaque [NCP]), supporting the notion that more aggressive cardiovascular (CV) evaluation strategy should be considered in these patients. Carotid ultrasound screening in this population may be a better alternative than traditional risk score to identify patients at high CV risk as the latter underestimated CV risk. Previous study from our group have demonstrated that achieving treatment target (minimal disease activity [MDA]) can prevent progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, 38% of this Treat to Target (T2T) cohort still had carotid plaque progression. Project description it is hypothesized that combination of a T2T stratgy together with high-intensity rosuvastatin treatment (Group 1: T2T-statin group) is more effective in preventing progression of coronary and carotid atherosclerosis than T2T stratgy alone (Group 2: T2T-only group) in high-risk PsA patients with carotid plaque. The primary outcome is to ascertain the effect of T2T strategy with high-intensity rosuvastain (Group 1: T2T-statin group) on the change in CIMT over a period of 12 months compared with T2T strategy alone (Group 2: T2T-only group)
Anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies are present in approximately one-fourth of the patients who are seronegative for both rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibody and who may therefore have psoriatic arthritis. The investigators hypothesized that detection of anti-CarP antibodies in serum may be useful for diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis.
The purpose of the study is to assess systemic certolizumab pegol (CZP) exposure, the formation of anti-CZP antibodies and safety of CZP across the course of pregnancy in study participants with chronic inflammatory diseases.
It is a randomized, double-blinded, single-dose, 2-arm parallel, comparative study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of BAT2506 Injection vs Simponi in healthy chinese male subjects A total of 182 subjects are planned to be included and randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to receive single subcutaneous administration of 50mg BAT2506 Injection or Simponi® (EU-licensed ). The study has a screening period of 14 days. PK blood samples will be collected from subjects to determine the serum concentration of Golimumab, thus to evaluate the change and similarity of the pharmacokinetics of the two study drugs. The investigator will perform safety evaluation for vital signs, physical examinations, injection site reaction, ECG, clinical laboratory tests and adverse events throughout the study. Immunogenicity evaluation (ADA, ADA titration and nAb) will also be evaluated.
Rationale: Shared decision-making models between clinicians and patients are critical to improving healthcare delivery and adherence to medication. One type of model, decision framing, is rarely studied in medicine. Decision framing is the way that a choice is worded. In a clinical context, patient choices can be worded positively, or "gain-framed", to explain the benefits of a therapy or negatively, or "loss-framed", to explain the risks of not taking a therapy. Previous literature suggests that decision-framing can significantly influence patients' decision-making regarding their healthcare. However, a critical gap exists in understanding how decision framing affects psoriasis patients' preferences for therapies. Objective: Determine whether loss-framed messages lead to greater therapy acceptance as compared to gain-framed messages among adults with psoriasis. Study population: 90 adults with psoriasis will be enrolled from USC ambulatory clinics and the general public. Intervention: Subjects will be exposed to gain-framed or loss-framed messages regarding psoriasis therapies. Specifically, gain-framed messages will explain the expected benefits of taking the psoriasis therapy and loss-framed messages will explain the potential risks of not taking the psoriasis therapy. Study Methodology: Cross-sectional single-intervention survey.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of filgotinib compared to placebo as assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in participants with active psoriatic arthritis who have an inadequate response or are intolerant to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARD) therapy.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of filgotinib compared to placebo as assessed by the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement (ACR20) response in participants with active psoriatic arthritis who are naive to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. The study consists of two parts, the Main Study and the Long Term Extension (LTE).