View clinical trials related to Appendicitis.
Filter by:Rate of appendix localization on ultrasound is not high. We suggest a way to improve it's localization by oral administration of iodinated contrast material.
To determine if non-operative management with antibiotics alone is a feasible treatment alternative for pediatric patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis with an appendicolith identified on imaging.
The literature has reported that fast track surgery can be safely applied to children undergoing appendectomy for acute appendicitis. There is no current evidence regarding the application of same day discharge protocol in children with intra-operative findings of suppurative appendicitis. The current standard of care for patients who present with intra-operative findings of suppurative appendicitis includes post-operative admission and treatment with intravenous antibiotics. Patients are discharged home once they have met the following discharge criteria: temperature less than 38.5 degrees Celsius, pain control with oral pain medication, and tolerating a liquid diet. Given the evidence in the literature that has shown that same day discharge of patients with acute appendicitis is safe and effective, we propose that fast track surgery protocol can be safely applied to patients with intraoperative findings of suppurative appendicitis. We hypothesize that this will result in a decreased postoperative length of stay, without an increase in 30-day complication rate.
The purpose of this study is to determine if a patient activation tool (PAT) can improve decision making and patient centered outcomes in pediatric patients with appendicitis and their caregivers choosing between antibiotics alone and appendectomy.
1. Purpose - The investigators aim to evaluate the feasibility of iPhone based remote control system as a real-time remote CT reading tool for suspected appendicitis under 3G network and the suboptimal illumination. 2. Methods - A total of 120 abdominal CT examinations; sixty had no findings of appendicitis, while the other sixty showed signs of acute appendicitis, were selected. The 16 raters reviewed these images using an LCD monitor of the PACS workstation and also an iPhone which was connected to the PACS workstation via remote control system, grading the probability of presence of acute appendicitis on each examination by a five Likert scale. - The investigators will compare the diagnostic performance between two devices.
This study will evaluate the use of microwave radiometry in a population of patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis and treated with appendectomy. The main purpose of the study is to report the results of microwave radiometry as a diagnostic tool in acute appendicitis and compare those results with the commonly used ultrasonography.
Introduction Appendicectomy (or appendectomy in US usage) is the single most commonly performed emergency surgical operation performed on British children. Previous investigation of outcomes following appendicectomy has suggested that specialist surgeons and high volume centres have fewer "negative" appendicectomies (i.e. the appendix found to be non-diseased), although there has not been consistent association found between hospital type or surgeon experience and complication rate or admission rate. Scotland has 3 dedicated children's surgery centres but straightforward children's surgery such as appendicectomy is also carried out in the country's general surgical centres. Appendicectomy outcome variations have not been explored in the Scottish National Health Service (NHS). Aim This study will compare appendicectomy outcomes in children between Scotland's specialist paediatric centres and general surgical centres. Methods This is a retrospective study of all appendicectomies performed in Scotland during the period from 1st January 2001 - 31st December 2010, on children aged 2 - 12 years old. It will use routinely collected administrative data from the Information Services Division of NHS National Services Scotland. The study will compare risk-adjusted 30 day/in-patient mortality, 30 day re-admission rate, 30 day re-operation rate, post-operative length of stay and negative appendicectomy rates.
This is a retrospective chart review meant to identify any factors that are correlated with and may possibly lead to postoperative nausea and vomiting in order to predict need for longer hospital stays and potentially decrease postoperative nausea and vomiting.
SUMMARY Rationale: A diagnostic laparoscopy is a frequently used method to confirm the diagnosis appendicitis. However until recently evidence-based laparoscopic criteria for determining appendicitis were not defined. If there is any doubt about the presence of appendicitis the appendix is usually removed. In a single centre prospective pilot study on 134 patients the investigators were able to define the Laparoscopic APPendicitis (LAPP) score. In the current study the investigators will validate the LAPP score in order to decrease the negative appendectomy rate by 50%. Eventually the score should lead to a decrease in morbidity. Objective: To decrease the negative appendectomy rate by 50%. Study design: A multicenter prospective validation study Study population: All patients, ≥18 years, operated with a diagnostic laparoscopy for the clinical suspicion appendicitis. Sample size calculation, performed by a statistician/ epidemiologist of the Trial Coordination Centre, showed the need to analyse 778 patients. Intervention (if applicable): Patients operated on appendicitis in 2008 and 2009 (n=843), were retrospectively analysed for negative appendectomies. This cohort will serve as the control group. In this control group no intervention was given, as the LAPP score was not yet defined. In the 778 prospective analysed patients, the LAPP score will be used during a diagnostic laparoscopy. With the LAPP score the investigators intend to halve the number of negative appendectomies. Main study parameters/endpoints: A decrease in the negative appendectomy rate from 9% to 5%. This decrease should not lead to an increase in missed appendicitis (occurring within 30 days), defined as requiring a surgical re-intervention or as an appendicitis or appendicular infiltrate on an ultrasound or CT-scan. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The risk of implementation of the LAPP score is minimal. In theory, the use of the LAPP score might lead to an increase risk in missed appendicitis. This might lead to an increase in morbidity.
Background Appendicitis is a common condition which represents a significant resource burden for the Scottish National Health Service (NHS). It is unknown whether there are significant differences in Scottish appendicectomy (appendectomy) outcomes which may be explained by hospital volume. In many studies, hospital procedural volume has been shown to be predictive of surgical outcomes. Aims The aim of this study is to compare appendicectomy outcomes in Scotland as they vary by hospital procedural volume. Methods This research study is a retrospective observational enquiry which will utilise administrative data from the Information Services Division (ISD) of NHS National Services Scotland. Patient episodes will be identified by a procedure codes for appendicectomy. A 10 year period will be studied, from January 2001 to December 2010. Primary outcome measures will be risk-adjusted 30 day/inpatient mortality, 30 day readmission rate, 30 day re-operation rate, length of stay and negative appendicectomy rate.