View clinical trials related to Appendicitis.
Filter by:Introduction Appendicitis is a common condition which represents a significant resource burden for the Scottish National Health Service (NHS). It is unknown whether there are significant differences in outcomes following appendicectomy which may be explained by geographic factors. Aims The aim of this study is to describe appendicectomy outcomes in Scotland as they vary by the urban-rural nature of the patient's home location and travel time from hospital. Methods This research study is a retrospective observational enquiry which will utilise administrative data from the Information Services Division (ISD) of NHS National Services Scotland. Patient episodes will be identified by a procedure code for appendicectomy, and the urban-rural classification of patients will be derived from postcode data. Travel time from hospital will also be estimated through postcode data. The investigators will study a 10 year period from January 2001 to December 2010. Primary outcome measures will be risk-adjusted 30 day/inpatient mortality, 30 day readmission rate, 30 day re-operation rate, length of stay and negative appendicectomy rates.
Comparison of open and laparoscopic appendectomy
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency of positive free fluid cultures in both perforated and non-perforated appendicitis. In addition predictors of positive free fluid cultures will be analyzed.
To determine whether low-dose (LD) CT is noninferior to standard-dose (SD) computed tomography (CT) as the first-line imaging test in adolescents and young adults in regard to negative appendectomy rate (NAR).
Appendicitis is one of the most common surgical problems in children, with 20-35% of patients having perforated by the time they present to a doctor. In these cases, the patient is often treated non-surgically with antibiotics. Once a patient has improved, it is not known whether it is better to perform an interval appendectomy (IA) or to continue a watchful waiting approach. The purpose of this trial is to determine if expectant nonoperative management (watchful waiting) is not inferior compared to IA management after successful conservative treatment of appendiceal mass at admission.
The aim of our monocentric prospective in intention-to-treat study is to evaluate the feasibility of outpatient appendectomy for non complicated acute appendicitis.
The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes and the operative costs of appendectomy performed with the Hem-O-Lok polymetric clips compared to endoscopic staplers. Prospective data will be collected before, during, and after surgery on patients undergoing a laparoscopic appendectomy that have the Hem-o-Lok ® stapler used to close the stump after the appendix is removed. Use of the Hem-o-Lok ® stapler is standard for appendectomy patients at Duke Regional Hospital. Retrospective data will be collected from patients who had an appendectomy prior to 1/2012 using a different clip as part of their surgery, or an open appendectomy to compare outcomes.
Acute appendicitis is a common disease and usually occurs within the ages of 10-30 years old." Ten percent of the population will get this disease during a lifetime." At Bispebjerg hospital it is one of the most common acute surgeries performed. Though at Bispebjerg hospital the surgery is only performed on adults as there is no pediatric ward. The surgical technique is primarily laparoscopic surgery, where the patients have their appendix removed while in general anaesthesia. During the last three years Bispebjerg hospital has had an average of 287 patients per year undergoing laparoscopic surgery. From January to the September 2012 a total of 211 patients have had the operation, with 29% having the operation performed during daytime, 48% in the evening and 22% at night. Open appendectomy is only performed in cases where laparoscopic surgery is impossible, this is often due to adhesions, scar tissue from former abdominal surgery or peritonitis. The scars from laparoscopic surgery are usually smaller than that from an open appendectomy, but it gives the patient three smaller scars divided on three abdominal quadrants instead of one larger scar on one quadrant. The investigators want to conduct a clinical trial with fifty six patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery due to acute appendicitis. The investigators want to find out if it is possible to improve the post-operative pain management within this very large group of patients undergoing acute surgery. In detail, the investigators wish to explore whether the use of the BD-TAP blockade in the abdominal wall on patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery due to acute appendicitis, can anesthetize the patients completely or partially, so they can avoid morphine intake completely or partially during the post-operative phase (12-24 hours). The research project will be a randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial.
Laparoscopic techniques have allowed surgeons to perform complicated intrabdominal surgery with minimal trauma. In numerous studies, when conventional laparoscopic appendectomy using 3 ports is compared with open appendectomy, it has advantages of reduced pain, reduced hospital stay, and enhanced cosmetic effects. Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) was developed with the aim of reducing the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy. In this study the investigators aimed to compare results of SILS appendectomy and three port conventional laparoscopic appendectomy prospectively.
This protocol examines choice where it pertains to choosing between two standard methods for appendectomy, laparoscopic or open procedures, and the affect that "cost" of the appendectomy has upon choice. Children admitted with a diagnosis of uncomplicated appendicitis will be consented to participate in a study in which the patient can choose between laparoscopic or open appendectomy procedures. Those that agree to review a consent form will be randomly placed into one of two groups. The two groups consist of one in which the consent form includes "cost information for each operative procedure" in the comparison between the procedures, and the other group receives a consent form that does not include "cost information for each operative procedure". Both groups also view a short, group specific, computerized presentation that describes each procedure. The hypothesis is that those patients given a choice between two similar surgical procedures and are provided with "cost information" will more often choose the less expensive surgical procedure than those that do not have information related to the cost of the surgical procedures.