View clinical trials related to Apnea.
Filter by:Effectively identifying and treating risk factors for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) is important to patients, their family members, and healthcare systems. While obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a known risk factor for stroke and TIA that is present in more than 70% of stroke/TIA survivors, testing for OSA is infrequently performed for patients and within healthcare systems. The Addressing Sleep Apnea Post-Stroke/TIA (ASAP) study intends to improve rates of guideline-recommended OSA testing and treatment through local quality improvement initiatives (QI) conducted within and across 6 VA Medical Centers. ASAP will also determine the impact of these local QI initiatives on rates of OSA diagnosis, OSA treatment, recurrent vascular events, and hospital readmissions.
The gold standard of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is (PSG)POLYSOMNOGRAPHY. During the examination, the patient is monitored by saturation, EEG and other measurements. Near infrared spectroscopy is an uprising technology allowing non invasive measurement of the frontal lobe oxygenation. It is painless and does not have side effects. We believe that brain saturation will be more accurate then peripheral pulse oximeter and will be better correlated with the clinical presentation of OSA.
Treating sleep apnea in adults caused by tonsillar hypertrophy with intracapsular tonsillectomy by coblation
This study intends to assess the effect of nasal airway stent (Nasten®) as a treatment modality in patients with sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) including snoring and/or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Nastent®, a distally perforated soft silicon nasal tube, is a mechanical splint against collapse of the upper airway at multiple levels. Nastent® might be able to prevent the vibrations caused by fluttering of various parts of the upper airway which leads to snoring. Furthermore, it also potentially secures a patent airway throughout the night securing airflow.
Sleep apnea is one of the most common chronic condition among US military Veterans, causing sleepiness, reduced psychomotor vigilance and depression, which undermine daytime functioning and quality of life. Persistent daytime symptoms of sleepiness in individuals with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) who are using Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) are associated with adverse long term medical and functional outcomes. Residual daytime sleepiness (RDS) is associated with reduced occupational and family functioning and overall lower quality of life. Napping is a common behavior among individuals with OSA and RDS and has been linked to both benefits to and decline in health and functioning. Longer nap times may maintain, as opposed to decrease, sleepiness by promoting sleep inertia and can contribute to maintaining subclinical circadian alterations that result in higher night-tonight variability in sleep patterns. Preliminary studies in humans and animal models have shown persisting alterations of circadian rhythms in OSA patients, that fail to normalize with CPAP treatment. CPAP treatment, while effective at correcting respiratory events and night time blood oxygen saturation levels, does not necessarily re-align the circadian system. Current treatment options are limited to stimulants and modafinil, whose long-term safety profile, effectiveness and impact on functional recovery is largely unknown. Supplementary exposure to bright light has beneficial effects on sleep quality and daytime vigilance in healthy individuals and it has been increasingly applied in a variety of sleep and neuropsychiatric conditions. However, no study to date has tested the application of BLT to treat daytime symptoms associated with sleep apnea. The investigators' study will be the first to explore the role of Bright Light Therapy (BLT), a well-established non-pharmacological intervention for circadian disturbances, for the treatment of residual daytime symptoms of OSA which do not respond to CPAP.
Obesity is the main risk factor for Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). Nasal CPAP is the standard treatment for OSA, but since weight-loss programs are not usually offered to OSA patients, the root causes of their illness and its comorbidities are not treated. There is some evidence regarding improvements in OSA after weight reduction but whether weight reduction programs are cost-efficient has not as yet been addressed. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an intensive weight-loss program, carried out in a project combining hospital and primary care levels, is cost-effective in the medium and long term for the treatment of obese patients with severe OSA undergoing CPAP treatment. More concretely, our objective is to demonstrate whether this program achieves sufficient improvement in OSA to allow a reduction <30/h in the apnea-hypopnea index in at least 25%, improving their metabolic profile and central obesity. METHOD: A prospective, randomized, controlled study. Control group: standard dietary recommendations. Intervention group: 0-3 months very low calorie diet, 15 days substituting three meals for low calorie shakes, from 15 to 120 days substituting 1 meal and from 120 days to 12 months on a low calorie diet while starting a progressive exercise program. Recommendations for good sleep habits will be given. The program will be carried out through group and individual sessions with the hospital dietician. After 3 months: group sessions with a nurse in the basic area. Group sessions led by hospital dietician. From 3 to 12 months: group sessions led by primary care nurse. MEASUREMENTS: At the beginning, at 3 and at 12 months: two-night home respiratory polygraph, actigraphy, anthropometric and blood analysis data including metabolic syndrome and inflammatory markers, and health related quality of life questionnaires. Direct and indirect costs of treatments, outpatient's consultations, incomes, emergency visits and patients' travel costs to medical centers.
This is a multi-centre, registry-based study whose primary objective is to evaluate the effect of treatment for sleep apnoea syndrome (SAS) on the number of syncope/malaise episodes in a population suffering from both idiopathic, recurrent vasovagal syncope/malaises and SAS.
This study aims to evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal oxygenation on safe apnea time for children undergoing general anesthesia, with their mouth open.
This study is looking at the way in which patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are diagnosed. The investigators current practice is to offer patients who are referred to the sleep centre with possible sleep apnoea a single night's oximetry recording. A decision is then made based on this screening test as to whether the patient has OSA, does not have OSA or requires a further investigation. There can be significant variation in the severity of OSA between nights. This study is designed to investigate if recording data from multiple nights will give any better indication on the presence and severity of obstructive sleep apnoea. Patients referred for overnight oximetry recordings that report excessive daytime sleepiness are eligible to enter the trial. On enrolment participants will all undergo a single night recording with the oximetry device currently in use by the recruiting sleep centre. In addition they will be asked to wear the prolonged recording oximeter (PRO) that allows for multiple nights data to be stored, and continue wearing this for a total of four nights. On returning both oximetry devices, this data will then be analysed and if it demonstrates evidence of OSA participants will return to the standard clinical pathway and be offered a trial of treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. If no evidence of OSA is seen participants will also revert back to the standard clinical pathway, which may involve a further inpatient sleep investigation being arranged. The number of patients identified as having OSA based on the single first night recording will be compared to those identified as having OSA only after the additional nights recording. All participants will return to the current standard pathway of care on leaving the trial.
Insomnia and OSA coexist in clinical populations, but the prevalence of comorbid insomnia among OSA patients in the community and risk factors remain poorly known. Little is known about the impact of sleep apnea and insomnia on the quality of life and quality of sleep compared to the presence of one of the sleep disorders alone. Our hypothesis is that the co-existence of OSA and insomnia is high in our community. We also hypothesized that the co-existence of OSA and insomnia promotes greater impairment of quality of life and quality of sleep when compared to the presence of OSA or insomnia alone. Patients referred to polysomnography will be submitted to 6 questionnaires to assess daytime sleepiness (EPWORTH), insomnia severity index (ISI), anxiety and depression assessment (Beck's anxiety and depression inventory), quality of life assessment(WHOQOL- BREF) and sleep quality assessment (Pittsburgh questionnaire) and they will also be submitted to a polysomnography type III. It will be calculated the frequency of insomnia, OSA and the comorbidity between insomnia and OSA in the sample. It will be analysed correlations between the insomnia severity index, apnea and hypopnea index, Epworth sleepiness scale, quality of life scale (WHOQOL-BREF), anxiety and depression scale (Beck's anxiety and depression inventory) and Pittsburgh sleep quality scale. Insomnia severity index scores, Epworth sleepiness scale, quality of life scale (WHOQOL-BREF), anxiety and depression scale (Beck anxiety and depression inventory) and Pittsburgh sleep quality scale will be compared according to the presence and absence of OSA and the presence and absence of insomnia and the presence of the comorbidity insomnia and OSA.