View clinical trials related to Aortic Valve Stenosis.
Filter by:Traditional and transcatheter surgical treatments of severe aortic valve stenosis (SAVS) are increasing in parallel with the improved life-expectancy. Recent randomized trials (RCTs) reported comparable or non-inferior mortality with transcatheter treatments compared to traditional surgery. However, RCTs have the limitation of being a mirror of the predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria, without reflecting the "real clinical world". Technological improvements have recently allowed the development of minimally invasive surgical accesses and the use of sutureless valves, but their impact on the clinical scenario is difficult to assess because of the monocentric design of published studies and limited sample-size. A prospective multicentre registry including all patients referred for a surgical treatment of SAVS (traditional, through full-sternotomy; minimally-invasive; or transcatheter; with both "sutured" and "sutureless" valves) will provide a "real-world" picture of available results of current surgical options, and will help to clarify the "grey zones" of current guidelines. E-AVR is a prospective observational open registry designed to collect all data from patients admitted for SAVS, with or without coronary artery disease, in 16 cardiac surgery Centres located in six countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, and United Kingdom). Patients will be enrolled over a 2-year period and followed-up for a minimum of 5 years to a maximum of 10 years after enrolment. Outcome definitions are concordant with VARC-2 criteria and established guidelines. Primary outcome is 5-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes aim at establishing "early" 30-day all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as major morbidity, and "late" cardio-vascular mortality, major morbidity, structural and non-structural valve complications, quality of life and echocardiographic results. The study protocol is approved by Local Ethics Committees. Any formal presentation or publication of data will be considered as a joint publication by the participating physician(s) and will follow the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) for authorship.
Aortic valve pathology is the third most common cardiovascular disease after coronary artery disease and hypertension, which is responsible for severe morbidity and mortality in elderly patients and requires surgical treatment in its most severe form of progression. The purpose of this study is to find a link between arterial stiffness and degenerative aortic stenosis. If this link is established, arterial stiffness may become a medical therapeutic target in order to delay the evolution of the disease.
Randomized controlled, multi-center trial randomizing patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at low to intermediate operative risk of mortality in a 1:1 fashion to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) to test, whether TAVI is non-inferior to SAVR, as measured by all-cause mortality or stroke after 1 and 5 years.
Multi-centre, multi-national, observational, prospective registry in four central full access centres in Germany (2), France (1) and the United Kingdom (1) and up to two satellites per hub (smaller hospitals / office based cardiologists (OBC) without access to surgical and percutaneous aortic valve (AV) interventions). The hypothesis is that the management of patients with severe AS will differ between sites with on-site access to all treatment modes and those without such facilities.
This study evaluates whether a preoperative assessment of myocardial contractile reserve by tissue Doppler Imaging and myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can enhance the patient selection and risk stratification to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
In this pilot study, investigators aim to identify patients undergoing TAVR who are at elevated risk for adverse clinical events due to decreased exertional capacity and physical deconditioning. Investigators aim to determine if monitored pre-procedural physical therapy is safe in these patients. Lastly, investigators aim to assess the efficacy of prehabilitation 1. to improve physical functioning by the time of TAVR and to sustain benefit through 30 days post-procedure; and 2. to determine its effect on post-procedural length-of-stay, clinical outcomes, and quality of life.
This is a pilot study in which we will aim to demonstrate successful execution of the imaging protocol and to make observations regarding the calcification activity as measured by 18F-NaF PET/CT and any correlation to 1) valve age and valve type, and 2) subsequent degeneration of aortic valve bioprostheses based upon clinical, echocardiographic and CT parameters. Additionally, the data will serve as preliminary data to plan a larger study to investigate study objectives.
Aortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease in the Western world. It is caused by progressive narrowing of the aortic valve leading to increased strain on the heart muscle which has to work increasingly hard to pump blood through the narrowed valve. Over time the heart muscle thickens to generate more force, but eventually the heart fails leading to death if the valve is not replaced with an operation. No medical treatments exist to stop or reverse the heart valve narrowing. Current clinical guidelines suggest that an operation should be performed only when symptoms develop or the heart muscle is visibly weak on cardiac ultrasound scanning. However, symptoms can be difficult to interpret and in many patients the heart muscle has become irreversibly damaged and the heart fails to recover following surgery. Using MRI scans of the heart, the investigators have identified heart scarring which seems to develop as the heart muscle thickens. Several studies now show that people who have developed this scarring are more likely to suffer poor outcomes including death. The investigators have also identified clinical risks that predict the presence of scarring. The investigators propose a study where patients with severe aortic stenosis but no indications for valve replacement as per current guidelines are assessed for those clinical risks. If a participant's risk of having scarring is higher they will undergo a cardiac MRI scan. If scarring is present participants will be randomised to routine clinical care, or referral for valve replacement surgery. Participants with no evidence of scarring will be randomised routine care with study follow or not. The investigators of this study hypothesize that early surgery will lead to fewer complications and reduced risk of death compared to standard care.
The primary purpose of this study is electronic data collection of arterial pressure waveform signals in patients with Aortic Stenosis. The collected digital pressure waveform data will be used to assess the feasibility of using the arterial pressure signal as a decision support tool for early detection of aortic stenosis conditions. Furthermore we evaluate hemodynamic parameters before and after valve repair and its correlation with outcome.
Study category and Rationale Clinical study, Category A. Clinical Phase: Post market study Background and Rationale: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) allows avoiding oral anticoagulation and provides at the same time an at least equally good protection from strokes and peripheral embolism. It may therefore be an attractive alternative to oral anticoagulation in the patient population undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): the concept of LAAO is based on the fact that thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation occurs in >90% in the left atrial appendage (LAA). Mechanical occlusion of the LAA reduces the stroke risk by eliminating the source of thrombus formation. In the here proposed "Randomized Comparison of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion versus Standard Medical Therapy in Patients in Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation", study we test the hypothesis, that LAAO is superior to standard medical therapy in the high-risk TAVI population. This hypothesis has not been investigated by previous studies so far. Overall Objective(s): Overall objective: to compare the safety (and efficacy) of LAAO using the St. Jude left atrial appendage closure device with standard medical therapy in a prospective, multi-center, randomized trial in patients undergoing TAVI in routine clinical practice. Primary Objective: To assess the safety of the device intervention with regard to stroke prevention and prevention of bleeding complications in a patients population at high risk of stroke and bleeding. Secondary Objectives: Short-term (procedural) safety of device intervention is assessed (rate of successful deployment of a left atrial appendage occluder; rate of kidney failure). As a further secondary objective, long-term effects of device intervention on stroke and bleeding prevention as well as mortality are assessed and compared to medical therapy. Outcome(s): Primary: Composite endpoint of ischemic and hemorrhagic neurologic events, peripheral embolism, life-threatening/disabling and major bleeding complications and cardiovascular mortality at 1 year Secondary: All deaths (cardiac and non-cardiac) at 30 days, 1, 3, and 5 years Device success at 30 days In-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI) Study design: An investigator-initiated, randomized, multicenter, non-blinded, all-comers study Measurements and Procedures: 80 patients in atrial fibrillation undergoing TAVI will be randomized in a non-blinded fashion (1:1 randomization) to LAAO (device group) or SMT at the operators' discretion (medical group; antiplatelet therapy and oral anticoagulation or oral anticoagulation alone). All patients will be followed for up to 5 years. The primary analysis will be performed at 30 days and after completion of a 1-year follow-up. 80 patients in atrial fibrillation undergoing TAVI will be randomized in a non-blinded fashion (1:1 randomization) to LAAO (device group) or standard medical therapy (SMT) at the operators' discretion (medical group; antiplatelet therapy, oral anticoagulation or oral anticoagulation alone). Estimated duration for the main investigational plan from start of screening of first participant to last participant processed and finishing the study: 6 years