View clinical trials related to Aortic Stenosis.
Filter by:This study aimed at comparing the performance of self-expandable valves versus balloon-expandable valves in patients with ascending aortic dilation undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
To evaluate the safety and feasibility of DurAVR™ THV System in the treatment of subjects with symptomatic severe native aortic stenosis.
Aortic valve sclerosis (aortic valve thickening and calcification without pressure gradient) is one of the most common valvular abnormalities in the Western world. Per year, about 1.8-1.9% of these patients develop aortic valve stenosis which will eventually be treated by TAVI (Transcatheter aortic valve implantation). The purpose of this study is to collect and monitor ongoing safety and performance clinical data of the ACURATE neo2™ aortic bioprosthesis and the ACURATE neo2™ transfemoral delivery system, hereafter referred to as the ACURATE neo2™ and transfemoral delivery system in the context of an observational investigator initiated trial (IIT).
This study will evaluate real-world outcomes for the SAPIEN 3 Ultra Transcatheter Heart Valve System in transcatheter aortic valve implantation centres that are implementing minimalist periprocedural practices and facilitating early discharge home.
To observe and evaluate the safety and efficacy of TaurusOne® transcatheter aortic valve system in patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis through a prospective, multicenter clinical trial using objective performance criteria.
Pragmatic, controlled, prospective, randomized, open-label (open-label), evaluator-blind clinical trial (PROBE design) that will analyze the benefits of dapagliflozin treatment in patients with severe aortic stenosis discharged after implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis transcatheter (TAVI).
Although concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is frequent in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), hemodynamic assessment of CAD severity in patients undergoing valve replacement for severe AS is challenging. Myocardial hypertrophic remodeling interferes with coronary blood flow and may influence the values of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and nonhyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs). The aim of the current study is to investigate the effect of the AS and its treatment on current indices used for evaluation of CAD. The investigators will compare intracoronary hemodynamics before, immediately after, and 6 mo after aortic valve replacement (AVR) when it is expected that microvascular function has improved. Furthermore, the investigators will compare FFR and resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) with myocardial perfusion single-photon emission-computed tomography (SPECT) as indicators of myocardial ischemia in patients with AS and CAD. One-hundred consecutive patients with AS and intermediate CAD will be prospectively included. Patients will undergo pre-AVR SPECT and intracoronary hemodynamic assessment at baseline, immediately after valve replacement [if transcatheter AVR (TAVR) is chosen], and 6 mo after AVR. The primary end point is the change in FFR 6 mo after AVR. Secondary end points include the acute change of FFR after TAVR, the diagnostic accuracy of FFR versus RFR compared with SPECT for the assessment of ischemia, changes in microvascular function as assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and the effect of these changes on FFR. The present study will evaluate intracoronary hemodynamic parameters before, immediately after, and 6 mo after AVR in patients with AS and intermediate coronary stenosis. The understanding of the impact of AVR on the assessment of FFR, NHPR, and microvascular function may help guide the need for revascularization in patients with AS and CAD planned for AVR.
The procedure is performed via transfemoral or transcaprotid access; Patients were confirmed to be eligible for TAVR by a multidisciplinary heart team including at least an interventional cardiologist, a cardiothoracic surgeon and an anesthetist. All TAVR implantation procedures were performed with the Edwards SAPIEN 3 THV or the MEDTRONIC CoreValve EVOLUT . For all patients, both vascular access and aortic valve were evaluated before the procedure by multislice computerized tomographic angiography (MSCT) of the entire aorta using vascular windows settings. The prosthesis and the vascular access were left to the discretion of the operating team. Transfemoral access was the first choice when possible. All TAVR procedures were performed in the same hybrid room (in Montpellier University Hospital), Most TAVR were performed under sedation or general anesthesia using mild low profile 14-16 French delivery systems and using percutaneous or surgical vascular access.
TEAM-Br is a randomized, prospective, cost-utility study comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic vale replacement in Brazil. The study is sponsored by the national Minister of Health, through PROADI-SUS (Programa de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Institucional do SUS).
The study collects real-world data of patients who were treated with the Acurate Neo TAVI System and evaluates early and midterm clinical outcomes.