View clinical trials related to Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine if association of methotrexate with adalimumab leads to decrease immunogenicity beside adalimumab alone in Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Observe in real life adherence therapy and time to switch in ankilosing spondylitis patients with predominant assial involvement with 4 anti-TNF.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) treatment, 5 mg/kg every 6 weeks, in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and to determine whether IFX dose reduction and interval extension, 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks during the second year sustained the treatment effect. The study was started in 2003 an finished in 2008.
This observational study will document to what extent in daily clinical practice the work productivity is affected before and after the start of adalimumab treatment. Changes in the employment status and work productivity of participants with AS and PsA before and after the start of adalimumab will be noted. The relationship between employment status, work productivity, disease activity and clinical evaluations will be evaluated. Since AS and PsA might be diseases with a strong impact on the daily life of the participant, an evaluation will be performed to the effect of the disease on quality of life and work productivity.
Seronegative spondyloarthritis (SpA) is a group of rheumatic diseases Foot involvement of the SpA is common and enthesitis, erosive changes or ankylosis are the frequent lesions. The functional status of the SpA patients are usually evaluated globally.The aim of this study is to assess specifically the foot -related functional limitations of the SpA patients.
Previous studies suggest that an increase in doses of weekly etanercept from 50 mg to 100 mg improves the efficacy of the treatment in patients with cutaneous psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriatic arthritis. In this same line of study, during the 2007 2008 period, we conducted a multicenter, double-blind, 12-week Study (LoadET, 0881A3-102090) comparing the efficacy of etanercept at a standard dose (50 mg/week) versus a double dose (100 mg/week) in subjects with AS refractory to conventional therapy. The interim results of said study do not appear to support the value of doubling the dose of etanercept in the treatment of subjects with AS. Once this study was finalised, the subjects continued to be monitored by their regular physician, who decided on the dose and treatment to follow according to the conditions of standard clinical practice. The objective of this observational study is to evaluate the course of the disease in the long-term (three years) under the conditions of standard clinical practice, in subjects who had participated in the LoadET study. Therefore, we would like to follow-up on those patients by reviewing their clinical histories for the three-year period between the finalisation of their participation in the LoadET Study (0881A3-102090) and now. This will allow us to assess the efficacy and survival of the drug, as well as the possible appearance of side effects in the three years following the finalisation of the study by comparing the results according to if the subjects had received 50 mg/week or 100 mg/week during the LoadET study (0881A3 102090).
This is the first study of oral tofacitinib in adults with active ankylosing spondylitis. It is designed to obtain information on the efficacy and safety of 3 different doses of tofacitinib.
The purpose of this non-interventional, multicenter, post-marketing observational study (PMOS) was to assess rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), plaque psoriasis (PS), Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients' adherence attitudes (beliefs) to maintenance therapy with adalimumab monotherapy or combination therapy with methotrexate (in participants with RA) and to investigate whether there were correlations between such beliefs and adherence to maintenance treatment.
Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is a disease that represents a considerable economic burden to the health care system as well as the whole society. The introduction of biologic therapy, though allowing for superior clinical and work productivity outcomes, has significantly increased direct medical costs of AS. Therefore it is important to weight the benefits against the costs to gain a basis for decisions on health care resource allocation. Due to differences in the health care systems, health insurance and general country settings, health economic data cannot be generalized across countries. Such data is generally lacking in Central and Eastern European countries, especially in the field of rheumatology. This study will evaluate selected health care resource utilization and productivity losses in patients with AS during and before the treatment with adalimumab in clinical practice. The impact of adalimumab therapy on the extent of outpatient attendance, hospitalizations and sick leave, which could be influenced by relatively short-term adalimumab therapy, will be taken into account, and in relation to treatment response. There is no published data on the impact of adalimumab therapy on hospitalizations and outpatient attendance in patients with AS. Further, data on health care resource utilization and sick leave before and during adalimumab therapy could be translated into financial cost estimates (potential cost savings) by each participating country, based on their own country specific cost per resource.
1. Our hypotheses on the relationship between periodontitis and AS are as follows; - The prevalence of periodontitis is higher in AS patients group than that of non-AS control group - Anti-TNF-α therapy would favorably affect the disease course of periodontitis. 2. Based on our hypotheses, the specific objectives of the present proposal are as follows; - The primary objective is to compare the prevalence rate of periodontitis between AS patient group and non-AS group. - The secondary objectives will be: - To observe the carriage rate of P. gingivalis in AS and non-AS groups - To identify clinical parameters associated with the severity of periodontitis in AS group. - To compare the progression of periodontitis at weeks 12 and 24 between AS and non-AS groups or between AS patients with and without anti-TNF-α treatment