View clinical trials related to Aneurysm.
Filter by:This study evaluates the effects of an eHealth tool and psychosocial support on anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life in patients undergoing surgical treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Participants in the intervention group will receive access to the eHealth tool and structured follow-up with a contact nurse, the control group will receive standard of care.
During surgery, electrophysiological signals will be acquired with the instrument (ISIS IOM, NeuroExplore, Software Version 4.4, Inomed) already in use at the Neurosurgery Service of the Neurocentro of the Hospital Civic Italian Switzerland in Lugano. Simultaneously to Somatosensorial Evoked Potential (SEP) will also be recorded the Electroencephalography (EEG) activity with the same detection of locations. For the purposes of the study the signals transmitted to the neurosurgeon through the hardware and the corresponding assessments done by the neurophysiologist responsible for intraoperative monitoring will be recorded. It will also be kept track of procedures performed during surgery.
The purpose of this study is to use a wire with a Doppler tip to measure blood flow in vessels in the brain and determine hemodynamic factors associated with treatment success or failure. Many neurological diseases cause abnormal blood flow in the brain in specific vessels. The special wire used in this study is place into brain blood vessels during standard of care procedure to treat such diseases, and blood flow parameters (such as velocity and pressure) are measured to gain better understanding of these neurological diseases.
In this study we aim to investigate the relationship between our anesthesia practice and post procedure complications after MRI scanning with sedation. This is a retrospective, single center observational study. All patients undergoing MRI scan during the study period will be included.
Fluoroscopy is traditionally used for guidance of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). In order to minimize exposure to radiation and nephrotoxic contrast medium, it is possible to generate a navigation road map by registering the intraoperative images with preoperative computed tomography angiograph (CTA). In modern hybrid operating rooms, several commercial solutions for this exists today (e.g. Siemens Syngo iPilot, Phillips Vesselnavigator). In order to register (fuse) the preoperative and intraoperative imaging to each other, a registration algorithm has to be applied. Sufficient accuracy of this algorithm is crucial, for if it fails the road map cannot be used for intraoperative navigation. The purpose of this study is therefore to evaluate two different 3D registration algorithms with regard to registration accuracy.
We will demonstrate the validity of measurements with a low-dose, EKG-gated CT without contrast in the ascending aorta evaluation, compared with the current Angio-CT measurements.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the Zenith Alpha™ Abdominal Endovascular Graft for the treatment of abdominal aortic or aorto-iliac aneurysm.
To determine the safety and efficacy of the BMFM® kit in the use for the endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms involving iliac arteries. The BMFM® kit is an adaptation of the aortic MFM® to the aortoiliac bifurcation morphology. It should be noted that the aortic MFM® has CE mark approval for the aortic aneurysm treatment.
The scope of this trial is the collection and analysis of effectiveness and safety endpoints, related to the use of the MicroPort NeuroTech Coil Embolization System in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
Exercise testing is commonly being used in patients before surgery to test their overall fitness. One group it is being used in is patients who have an enlarged blood vessel in their stomach. This is known as an abdominal aortic aneurysm. The exercise test used is known as a cardiopulmonary exercise test as it looks at both heart and lung function at the same time. Whilst this test is commonly used there have been no studies (to date) which have looked at how reliable this test is; this means how well the investigators can obtain the same (or very similar) results after multiple tests. The investigators would like to test this reliability both between patients and the clinicians performing the testing.