View clinical trials related to Anesthesia, Local.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to determine, among patients receiving elective anorectal surgery, does application of ice to the perianal area prior to the procedure, lead to use of decreased amounts of intravenous (IV) anesthesia? Anorectal surgeries for hemorrhoids, fistulas and fissures are done on an outpatient basis under monitored anesthesia care. This means patients get sedating medications through an IV but often do not require intubation. The difficulty with monitored anesthesia is balancing patient comfort against the risk of apnea (not breathing due to over sedation). Application of ice to the perianal area may help increase patient comfort, decrease the amounts of medications given for sedation and therefore decrease risk and increase recovery from the anesthesia.
In order to determine if Intralipid 20% can be used to reverse the effects of local anesthetics, the investigators will recruit 18 volunteers who will be asked to come to HSS for two study visits. Small amounts of local anesthetics will be injected into the volunteers' thighs during both visits. During one visit volunteers will receive Intralipid 20% and during the other visit they will receive a saline solution. The study team will measure how quickly normal sensation returns to the thighs when the volunteers get Intralipid 20% compared to saline.
The purpose of this clinical study is to evaluate the long term safety and efficacy of cooling anesthesia application to the eye as anesthesia for intravitreal injection using a novel cooling anesthesia device.
This study evaluates differences in how administering liposomal bupivacaine via two different methods affects postoperative pain control in laparoscopic abdominal surgery patients. Half the participants will receive liposomal bupivacaine via a transverses abdominis plane block while the other half will receive liposomal bupivacaine via local infiltration.
To study the patients' and dentists' perception of receiving/ administering maxillary buccal infiltration anesthesia using an open or closed mouth techniques
This is a study that will be conducted on 6 to 8 years old children to compare the needle-less jet injector with the conventional needle attached syringe in terms of efficiency in controlling pain of local anesthetic infiltration and post-anesthetic pulpotomy of upper first primary molars. The study tests a null hypothesis that states that there is no difference in pain control efficiency of the compared anesthetic techniques when used for the selected treatment procedure in the specified population.
Optimal analgesia following ambulatory surgery is an important matter for patient satisfaction and it reduces unnecessary hospital admissions. This study investigated whether caudal block with different combinations of local anesthetics can alter postoperative pain scores and additional rescue analgesic use. The investigators also aim to determine the side effects of these technique such as nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression, length of hospital stay, first micturition or mobilization times, surgical and anesthetic complications.
Despite many recent advances in pain management, post-operative pain is widely considered to be poorly managed. Furthermore, the mainstay of current pain management is opioids, for which there is strong evidence of ill effects and long-term potential for addiction. There are many studies demonstrating that perineural regional anesthesia can be superior to intravenous opioid analgesia, and that the technique is safe. By using temporary implanted catheters, this method can now deliver prolonged analgesia, thus reducing the need for opioids in the postoperative period. Regional anesthesia is a proven technique and used daily by anesthesiologists, and it is also the first choice for hip and knee replacement surgery for orthopedic surgeons. Patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with the use of free tissue transfer experience a significant amount of post-operative pain due to the complexity of the surgery, the presence of a head and neck surgical site as well as a secondary donor site, and existing co-morbidities, most commonly malignancy, that also cause significant pain. These patients often require opioids for pain control throughout the hospital stay, and are almost always discharged home with additional opioids. By utilizing regional anesthesia blocks at the donor sites, the investigators can potentially reduce post-operative pain while also reducing the use of opioids.
Participants that undergo permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation can often present with challenging anesthetic management plans for the anesthesia provider. Typically, these procedures are performed in electrophysiology labs that are often in remote locations away from the main operating room suite. This presents the logistic challenges of not having standard anesthesia machines, equipment and medications readily available for these cases.Currently, the majority of these cases are done under local anesthesia with light to moderate sedation. However, when it comes to inserting more complex devices such as implantable cardiac defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, participants may not be able to tolerate these more invasive and painful procedures with only local anesthetic as the primary mode of analgesia. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthetic techniques, in particular the pectoralis nerve blocks (PEC I and II) and the Transversus Thoracic Muscle plane block (TTP), offer an alternative mode of analgesia for these participants. PEC I blocks target the lateral and medial pectoral nerves by injecting local anesthetic in the fascial plane between the pectoralis major and minor muscles. PEC II blocks supplement the PEC I block by targeting the intercostal nerves with local anesthetic injected between the pectoralis minor and serratus anterior muscles. The transversus thoracic plane block targets the anterior cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves. In combination, these four blocks would provide analgesia of the upper anterior chest wall.(3)These would provide effective analgesia of the upper anterior chest wall.(7). However, there is a paucity of studies on the use of PEC blocks in cardiac pacemaker implantation procedures. There is a case report from 2014 on a 71 year-old male with an ejection fraction of 20% undergoing CRTD implantation, which showed that PECs block with moderate sedation using dexmedetomidine could be safely utilized to provide effective analgesia for the procedure.11 However, this was not a subcutaneous ICD that required tunneling of the coils. Thus there are no randomized controlled studies to investigate whether the use of peripheral nerve blocks as primary anesthetic choice could be a viable alternative for multiple participants undergoing subcutaneous ICD placement.
To determine if Exparel (Liposomal Bupivacaine, an FDA approved drug) use in ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) blocks may reduce opioid requirement use postoperatively, reduce pain scores postoperatively, reduce incidence of nausea in the postop period, and decrease length of hospital stay