Clinical Trials Logo

Anesthesia; Adverse Effect clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Anesthesia; Adverse Effect.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05546021 Enrolling by invitation - Breast Cancer Clinical Trials

Nociception Level Monitor (NOL) During Guided Analgesic Delivery in Breast Surgeries

Start date: January 1, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

To assess if perioperative consumption of opioids can be optimized with the assistance of a Nociception Level (NOL) monitor in breast surgery patients receiving pectoral and parasternal nerve blocks as supplementation to general anaesthesia. Hypothesis: 1. NOL monitor guidance optimizes perioperative analgesic consumption and postoperative length of stay and offers a better quality of recovery in breast surgery. 2. Intraoperative NOL monitoring can detect the efficacy of pectoralis and parasternal nerve blocks. 3. Incidence of persistent neuropathic pain after breast cancer surgery is lower in patients receiving lower doses of perioperative opioids.

NCT ID: NCT05543824 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Anesthesia; Adverse Effect

Hemodynamic Impact of Epidural Anesthesia in Relation to Age in Pediatric Patients.

REHAEPP-2022
Start date: September 12, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Epidural analgesia is established as the gold standard in the management of post-surgical pain in multiple modalities, including the pediatric patient. It is a technique that is not without risks, but with multiple benefits such as less response to stress, less incidence of chronic pain after surgery, less incidence of nausea and vomiting and other adverse effects derived from opioids, faster recovery and increased patient and family satisfaction. However, as it has been mentioned, the epidural carries risks both in the technique itself (wet or intravascular puncture) and subsequently after the injection of medication that generates a sympathetic blockade with arterial hypotension and an increase in compensatory heart rate. Unlike in adult patients, in pediatric patients epidural and subarachnoid anesthesia are better tolerated hemodynamically due to less vagal and sympathetic activity and almost no systemic venodilation. This lower activity of the autonomic nervous system is due to its immaturity, which is why, with the growth of the infant, this anesthetic technique increasingly affects its hemodynamics, being similar to the adult at the age of 8-12 years. The study hypothesis does not differ from that stated in physiology books and studies, but the investigators seek to identify the direct correlation of age with the different hemodynamic parameters available with current technology (cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, blood pressure ) in pediatric patients after epidural anesthesia. The study will be carried out in pediatric patients undergoing major surgery that requires the placement of an epidural catheter and invasive blood pressure, without modifying in any way the usual practice of the responsible anesthesiologist. The patient's hemodynamic data will be collected at time 0 (prior to catheter placement), one minute, 5 and 10 minutes after the bolus of local anesthetic administered to measure the child's hemodynamic response and relate it to their age and development. .

NCT ID: NCT05383417 Completed - Dysphagia Clinical Trials

No Post Intubation Laryngeal Symptoms

No-PILS
Start date: November 8, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of the study is to test a novel endotracheal tube support device that reduces pressure of the tube on the voice box for prevention of post intubation laryngeal symptoms including sore throat, change in voice and trouble swallowing.

NCT ID: NCT05368415 Completed - Clinical trials for Cesarean Section Complications

Comparison Between Three Norepinephrine Bolus Doses for Management of Post-spinal Hypotension During Ceaserian Section for Patients With Preeclampsia

Start date: May 15, 2022
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Maternal hypotension after subarachnoid block is a frequent and deleterious complication during lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). Prophylaxis against hypotension using vasopressors had become a standard recommendation. In mothers with preeclampsia, post-spinal hypotension is less frequent compared to healthy mothers; thus, the latest guidelines do not recommend using vasopressors in preeclampsia patients unless there is a hypotensive episode . The incidence of post-spinal hypotension in mother with preeclampsia is nearly 25%. The commonly used vasopressors during CS are ephedrine, phenylephrine, and recently norepinephrine. The use of ephedrine is usually accompanied with maternal tachycardia and foetal acidosis. Phenylephrine (PE) had been the first line for prevention and management of maternal hypotension; however, its use in mothers with preeclampsia had not been adequately investigated. Thus, the best vasopressor for management of hypotension in mothers with preeclampsia is unknown. Norepinephrine (NE) is an alpha adrenergic agonist with weak beta adrenergic agonistic activity; thus, it does not cause significant cardiac depression as phenylephrine does. NE was introduced for use during CS with promising results when used as infusion and as boluses in healthy mothers . The use of NE boluses in management of hypotension in preeclamptic mothers was not adequately investigated. A dose 4 mcg NE was recently evaluated in preeclamptic mothers. In this study, we will compare 3 NE bolus doses (3 mcg, 4 mcg, and 5 mcg) in management of maternal hypotension after spinal block during CS in preeclamptic mothers.

NCT ID: NCT05358535 Recruiting - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Propofol and Etomidate Admixtures Comparisons Trial (PEAC Trial)

PEAC
Start date: September 19, 2022
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hemodynamics and adverse event profile in comparison between two treatment arms, one using an admixture of propofol and etomidate at a ratio by volume of 25%/75% (P2E7), and one using an admixture of propofol and etomidate at a ratio by volume of 75%/25% (P7E2), for anesthesia during endoscopic procedures at the Clements University Hospital (CUH) endoscopy lab (Endo).

NCT ID: NCT04797312 Recruiting - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

Comparison of an Opioid-Free Anesthesia Protocol Versus Standard Practices on Early and Late Post-operative Recovery

SOFA
Start date: July 12, 2021
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA) is an anesthesia protocol that does not use morphine, and is increasingly used routinely. Indeed, this protocol would theoretically allow a better post-operative analgesic control, a lower incidence of post-operative complications (e.g. post-operative nausea and vomiting). In the end, it would also allow a better overall post-operative recovery and a decrease in the incidence of chronic post-operative pain. Nevertheless, the literature is poor on this issue and no randomized controlled study has evaluated the effect of the use of this type of anesthesia protocol on postoperative recovery.

NCT ID: NCT04685980 Completed - Clinical trials for Cesarean Section Complications

Factors Associated With Failed Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Start date: December 25, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

The aim of this study is to reveal the factor associated with failed spinal anaesthesia in cesarean delivery. We conduct the retrospective case-control study to elucidate the involving factors.

NCT ID: NCT04679818 Completed - Clinical trials for Anesthesia; Adverse Effect

Postoperative Consequences of Intraoperative NOL Titration

Start date: December 30, 2020
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

To demonstrate that intraoperative NOL-guided titration of fentanyl improves initial recovery characteristics.

NCT ID: NCT04634981 Completed - Clinical trials for Anesthesia; Adverse Effect

Does the Mode of Anesthesia Affect the Feto-maternal Outcome in Category-1 Caesarean Section

Start date: August 12, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Spinal anesthesia (SA) has become the standard technique in elective cesarean section (CS) as it results in less maternal and neonatal morbidity than general anesthesia (GA) (Grade-A recommendation, NICE). For women requiring emergency CS, rapid sequence general anesthesia (RSGA) is commonly used because this technique is faster to perform than SA. Though several randomized trials have compared the maternal and fetal outcome between these two anesthetic techniques, the studies with respect to category 1 CS (emergent conditions that hold immediate threat to life of the woman or fetus) are limited.

NCT ID: NCT04604106 Recruiting - Anesthesia Clinical Trials

General Anesthesia Exposure and Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Pediatrics

GAP
Start date: October 21, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This study investigates the impact of different levels of anesthesia exposure on children's neurocognitive development and evaluates the concurrent validity of different methods that assess neurodevelopmental outcome.