Clinical Trials Logo

Anemia, Hemolytic clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Anemia, Hemolytic.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT05694312 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Ibrutinib for the Treatment of AIHA in Patients With CLL/SLL or CLL-like MBL

Start date: November 24, 2023
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This is a multicenter, single arm, phase II study aimed at evaluating ibrutinib therapy for the treatment of AIHA in patients with CLL/SLL or CLL-like MBL.

NCT ID: NCT05648968 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (wAIHA)

A Study of Efficacy and Safety of Ianalumab in Previously Treated Patients With Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

VAYHIA
Start date: December 30, 2022
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of ianalumab compared to placebo in patients with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia, who failed at least one line of treatment.

NCT ID: NCT05263817 Recruiting - Amyloidosis Clinical Trials

A Clinical Study of CD19/BCMA CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Refractory POEMS Syndrome, Amyloidosis, Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, and Vasculitis

Start date: October 8, 2021
Phase: Early Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

A Clinical Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of CD19/BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells in the Treatment of Refractory POEMS Syndrome, Amyloidosis, Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia, and Vasculitis

NCT ID: NCT05175105 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Pediatric Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mitapivat in Pediatric Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency (PKD) Who Are Not Regularly Transfused, Followed by a 5-Year Extension Period

ACTIVATE-Kids
Start date: June 6, 2022
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Study ACTIVATE-Kids (AG348-C-023) will evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered mitapivat as compared with placebo in pediatric participants with pyruvate kinase deficiency (PKD) who are not regularly receiving blood transfusions. Participants will be randomized 2:1 to receive either mitapivat or matching placebo. Randomization will be stratified by age (1 to < 6 years, 6 to < 12 years, 12 to < 18 years). Participants will be dosed by age and weight during a double-blind period consisting of an 8-week dose titration period followed by a 12-week fixed-dose period. Participants who complete the double-blind period will be eligible to receive mitapivat for up to 5 years in the open-label extension (OLE) period.

NCT ID: NCT05089227 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Efficacy of Prolonged Anticoagulation for Primary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolic Disease in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: a Prospective, Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter Study

API-AHAI
Start date: February 3, 2022
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a rare autoimmune disease (incidence <1/100,000 population) responsible for the destruction of red blood cells by the host immune system, notably through the action of autoantibodies. Apart from complications related to anemia, the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population is frequent, estimated at 20-27%. The risk of VTE is highest during the period of hemolysis, especially during the first 3 months after the diagnosis of AIHA. This risk is 7.5 [4.7; 12.0] times greater than in the general population. No clinical predictive factor for VTE was identified and the usual factors (cancer, previous VTE, bed rest >3 days, surgery, age >70 years, heart or respiratory failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, obesity, hormone replacement therapy) were not considered. Several biological risk factors have been suggested (depth of anemia, bilirubin level, leukocyte count, antiphospholipid antibodies) but have not been confirmed in other studies. AIHA is therefore a risk factor for VTE in its own right, and the National Diagnostic and Care Protocol (NDCP) recommends the implementation of VTE prevention during acute hemolysis (Grade C). However, the value of this prophylaxis has never been prospectively evaluated and its duration is empirical. In practice, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is generally used during "flare-ups" of AIHA (diagnosis and relapse) in hospitalized patients, but is rarely continued beyond the hospital phase when VTE also occurs in ambulatory patients. Thus, we hypothesize that prolonged preventive anticoagulation during the 12-week risk period following diagnosis or relapse of AIHA could decrease the incidence of VTE. In orthopedic surgery, this strategy has been proven to decrease VTE from 50% to 10-15%. In certain high-risk medical situations, prolonged prophylaxis with apixaban has been shown to decrease the occurrence of VTE from 10.2% to 4.2% in solid cancers4 and from 4-11% to 2% in myeloma.

NCT ID: NCT05057468 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Primary Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Second-line Treatment of Primary Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Start date: October 20, 2021
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

the cyclosporine showed efficacy in many immune cytopenic diseases in the light of numerous case reports and retrospective data. This study compares cyclosporin versus rituximab in steroid-refractory anemia.

NCT ID: NCT04902833 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Acquired Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency In Clonal Myeloid Neoplasms

Start date: February 1, 2022
Phase:
Study type: Observational

This cross-sectional prevalence assessment study involves a single blood draw in specific patient populations to assess for enzymatic and genomic evidence for acquired pyruvate kinase deficiency.

NCT ID: NCT04398459 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Refractory/Relapsed Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

The Safety and Efficacy of Ibrutinib in Refractory/Relapsed Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Start date: May 1, 2020
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This is an open-label, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Ibrutinib in subjects with refractory/relapsed autoimmune hemolytic anemia.

NCT ID: NCT04119050 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Efficacy and Safety of M281 in Adults With Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Start date: August 15, 2019
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of M281 in participants with warm autoimmune hemolytic anemia (wAIHA).

NCT ID: NCT04024202 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia

Data Registry of Auto Immune Hemolytic Anemia

DRAIHA
Start date: July 12, 2019
Phase:
Study type: Observational

In autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) auto-antibodies directed against red blood cells (RBCs) lead to increased RBC clearance (hemolysis). This can result in a potentially life-threatening anemia. AIHA is a rare disease with an incidence of 1-3 per 100,000 individuals. An unsolved difficulty in diagnosis of AIHA is the laboratory test accuracy. The current 'golden standard' for AIHA is the direct antiglobulin test (DAT). The DAT detects autoantibody- and/or complement-opsonized RBCs. The DAT has insufficient test characteristics since it remains falsely negative in approximate 5-10% of patients with AIHA, whereas a falsely positive DAT can be found in 8% of hospitalized individuals. Also apparently healthy blood donors can have a positive DAT. The consequences of DAT positivity are not well known and may point to early, asymptomatic disease, or to another disease associated with formation of RBC autoantibodies, such as a malignancy or (systemic) autoimmune disease. Currently, there are no guidelines to follow-up DAT positive donors. A second unsolved difficulty is the choice of treatment in AIHA. Hemolysis can be stopped or at least attenuated with corticosteroids, aiming to inhibit autoantibody production and/or RBC destruction. Many patients do not respond adequately to corticosteroid treatment or develop severe side effects. Currently, it is advised to avoid RBC transfusions since these may lead to aggravation of hemolysis and RBC alloantibody formation. But in case symptomatic anemia occurs, RBC transfusions need to be given. An evidence-based transfusion strategy for AIHA patients is needed to warrant safe transfusion in this complex patient group. To design optimal diagnostic testing and (supportive) treatment algorithms, the investigators will study a group well-characterized patients with AIHA and blood donors without AIHA, via a prospective centralized clinical data collection and evaluation of new laboratory tests. With this data the knowledge of the AIHA pathophysiology and to evaluate diagnostic testing in correlation with clinical features and treatment outcome can be improved.