Non-invasive Ultrasound Retinal Stimulation for Vision Restoration

Age-Related Macular Degeneration Clinical Trial

Official title:

Revolutionary Non-Invasive Ultrasound Technology for Vision Restoration in Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and Retinitis Pigmentosa (RP) Patients

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05914233
• Other study ID #: HS-23-00143
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: June 15, 2024
• Est. completion date: July 15, 2025

Study information

• Verified date: February 2024
• Source: University of Southern California
• Contact: Qifa Zhou, PhD
• Phone: (213) 821-2649
• Email: qifazhou[@]usc.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This clinical trial aims to test the safety and feasibility of using a non-invasive ultrasound device to stimulate retinal nerve cells and restore vision in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Previous studies have shown that artificial stimulation, such as electric and optic stimulations, can partially restore vision, but these methods are invasive and pose surgical risks. The study aims to develop a non-invasive method for retinal stimulation. The investigators will follow the FDA guidelines to limit the ultrasound power and adhere to all clinical trial regulations to ensure all participants' safety. The main questions the investigators aim to answer are: - Is using high-frequency ultrasound safe using a wearable device for localized retinal neural activity stimulation? - Does the stimulation through the device restore vision in patients with age-related macular degeneration? Participants in this study will be asked to undergo Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) scanning before and after the ultrasound stimulation to evaluate the device's safety. Then, they will receive five stimulation-rest cycles and complete a questionnaire to report what they see and how they feel during the device's operation.

Description:

This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new non-invasive ultrasound retinal stimulation device for vision restoration in patients with age-related macular degeneration. The investigators will take the following measures: - The study population will consist of patients with age-related macular degeneration for whom traditional medical treatments have been ineffective and for whom there are no other viable treatment options. - The investigators will follow the FDA guidelines and adhere to all regulations related to clinical trials to ensure the safety of all participants. - The investigators will obtain informed consent from each participant and ensure that they fully understand the risks and benefits of the study before enrolling. - The investigators will closely monitor each participant during the study and record any adverse events or complications. - The investigators will use high-frequency ultrasound for localized stimulation, which is safe and effective in other studies. Participants will receive stimulation from the non-invasive ultrasound device for five cycles and complete a questionnaire about their experiences. The researchers will analyze the results to determine the efficacy and safety of the device. With these measures in place, The investigators believe that the study design and methodology are appropriate and will result in a low-risk study that meets the FDA's requirements for clinical trials.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 5
• Est. completion date: July 15, 2025
• Est. primary completion date: July 15, 2024
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Diagnosis of AMD (regardless of stage and type) or RP. At least two volunteers should diagnose with RP.

2. Age 18 years or older

3. No other eye-related health conditions

4. No allergic history to commercial ultrasound gel

5. Must be willing and able to comply with the protocol testing

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Declining to participate and inability to give informed consent.

2. Unable to comply with the process of the research

3. If the volunteer has optic nerve disease, including the history of glaucoma, optic neuropathy, or other confirmed damage to optic nerve or visual cortex damage

4. Unable to fixate that hinders obtaining high-quality imaging

5. High myopia; refractive error of six diopters and above

6. Pregnancy

7. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that may conflict with the objectives, follow-up, or testing of this study

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Age-Related Macular Degeneration
• Macular Degeneration
• Retinitis
• Retinitis Pigmentosa
• Ultrasound Therapy; Complications

Intervention

Device:
• Non-invasive ultrasound retinal stimulation Device
Record user feelings during the device is working

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Southern California

References & Publications (14)

Ahuja AK, Dorn JD, Caspi A, McMahon MJ, Dagnelie G, Dacruz L, Stanga P, Humayun MS, Greenberg RJ; Argus II Study Group. Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Apr;95(4):539-43. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2010.179622. Epub 2010 Sep 29. — View Citation

Brandolin P, Martinelli G, Zanoni A. [Possibilities of use of neuroleptoanalgesic drugs of type II (dehydrobenzoperidol and fentanyl) in emergency abdominal surgery in aged patients]. Acta Anaesthesiol. 1968;19:Suppl 4:93+. No abstract available. Italian. — View Citation

Chaumet-Riffaud AE, Chaumet-Riffaud P, Cariou A, Devisme C, Audo I, Sahel JA, Mohand-Said S. Impact of Retinitis Pigmentosa on Quality of Life, Mental Health, and Employment Among Young Adults. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 May;177:169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Feb 22. — View Citation

Chen Y, Shi Z, Shen Y. Eye damage due to cosmetic ultrasound treatment: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 29;18(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0891-2. — View Citation

Chou R, Dana T, Bougatsos C, Grusing S, Blazina I. Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016 Mar 1;315(9):915-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0783. — View Citation

da Cruz L, Dorn JD, Humayun MS, Dagnelie G, Handa J, Barale PO, Sahel JA, Stanga PE, Hafezi F, Safran AB, Salzmann J, Santos A, Birch D, Spencer R, Cideciyan AV, de Juan E, Duncan JL, Eliott D, Fawzi A, Olmos de Koo LC, Ho AC, Brown G, Haller J, Regillo C, Del Priore LV, Arditi A, Greenberg RJ; Argus II Study Group. Five-Year Safety and Performance Results from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct;123(10):2248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.06.049. Epub 2016 Jul 21. — View Citation

Fomenko A, Neudorfer C, Dallapiazza RF, Kalia SK, Lozano AM. Low-intensity ultrasound neuromodulation: An overview of mechanisms and emerging human applications. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):1209-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 23. — View Citation

Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, Greenberg R, Williamson R, Little J, Mech B, Cimmarusti V, Van Boemel G, Dagnelie G, de Juan E. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res. 2003 Nov;43(24):2573-81. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00457-7. — View Citation

Jager RD, Mieler WF, Miller JW. Age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2606-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0801537. No abstract available. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 16;359(16): 1736. — View Citation

Liu SH, Lai YL, Chen BL, Yang FY. Ultrasound Enhances the Expression of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Astrocyte Through Activation of TrkB-Akt and Calcium-CaMK Signaling Pathways. Cereb Cortex. 2017 Jun 1;27(6):3152-3160. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhw169. — View Citation

Lu G, Qian X, Gong C, Ji J, Thomas BB, Humayun MS, Zhou Q. Ultrasound Retinal Stimulation: A Mini-Review of Recent Developments. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2022 Dec;69(12):3224-3231. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3220568. Epub 2022 Nov 24. — View Citation

Lu Y, Brommer B, Tian X, Krishnan A, Meer M, Wang C, Vera DL, Zeng Q, Yu D, Bonkowski MS, Yang JH, Zhou S, Hoffmann EM, Karg MM, Schultz MB, Kane AE, Davidsohn N, Korobkina E, Chwalek K, Rajman LA, Church GM, Hochedlinger K, Gladyshev VN, Horvath S, Levine ME, Gregory-Ksander MS, Ksander BR, He Z, Sinclair DA. Reprogramming to recover youthful epigenetic information and restore vision. Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7836):124-129. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2975-4. Epub 2020 Dec 2. — View Citation

TASSICKER GE. Preliminary report on a retinal stimulator. Br J Physiol Opt. 1956 Apr;13(2):102-5. No abstract available. — View Citation

Ye J, Tang S, Meng L, Li X, Wen X, Chen S, Niu L, Li X, Qiu W, Hu H, Jiang M, Shang S, Shu Q, Zheng H, Duan S, Li Y. Ultrasonic Control of Neural Activity through Activation of the Mechanosensitive Channel MscL. Nano Lett. 2018 Jul 11;18(7):4148-4155. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00935. Epub 2018 Jun 19. — View Citation

* Note: There are 14 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Visual function-Assessed by Questionnaire	A questionnaire will be given to participants. The answers will be recorded as "No" or "Yes." If "Yes" is selected as the participant's answer, their descriptions according to the given questions will be recorded in detail.	2 hours (average duration of procedure)
Primary	Adverse Event	The nature and number of Treatment-Related Adverse Events.	From time of procedure up to 2 hours after process completion
Secondary	Comfort Level-Assessed by Questionnaire	A scale of 0 to 5 will be provided to the participants. 0 is no feeling, and 5 is very pain or uncomfortable	2 hours (average duration of procedure)

External Links

•   Noninvasive Ultrasound Retinal Stimulation for Vision Restoration at High Spatiotemporal Resolution