View clinical trials related to Adhesion.
Filter by:The study is a single-arm, retrospective, chart review with a patient questionnaire intended to supplement the patient chart, when necessary. The population will consist of patients who underwent an index gynecologic surgery (performed at least 2 years prior to the start of the study) during which COSEAL was used as an adjunct to good surgical technique to reduce the incidence, severity, and extent of post-surgical adhesion formation. The purpose of the study is to detect the incidence of adhesion-related morbidities as measured by the proportion of adhesion-related readmissions, including reoperations in these patients. Patient charts will be reviewed to collect the data on readmissions related to adhesions, If the patient chart has no record of adhesion related readmission within approximately 2 years of the index surgery, then a patient questionnaire will be sent. A questionnaire may still be sent if a patient chart has a record of adhesion related readmission within approximately 2 years of the index surgery and further clarification is needed. The questionnaire will collect information regarding readmission or reoperation directly or possibly related to adhesions following the index gynecologic surgical procedure at a hospital or outpatient clinic other than that of the index surgery.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical performance of a Universal adhesive's different application modes.
To compare the costs and effects of HYALOBARRIER® GEL ENDO versus no HYALOBARRIER® GEL ENDO for increasing the chance of conception leading to live birth measured at 30 weeks after randomization in women wishing to become pregnant after surgical removal of intrauterine pathology (endometrial polyps, fibroids with uterine cavity deformation, uterine septa, IUAs or RPOC after miscarriage) by hysteroscopy as an outpatient or in hospital treatment.
The surface of non-carious cervical lesions (LCNC) is a challenge to adhesive systems, it presents a dentin layer sclera hypermineralized, presence of bacteria and lack of mechanical retention, so this study aimed to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments on LCNC through a randomized clinical trial. Patients with LCNC were referred to the study and selected according to the inclusion criteria, such as the presence of at least 3 LCNC. Three different types of surface treatment were carried out in LCNC: control group, 15 seconds of etching dentin; Group I, acid etching of dentin in 30 seconds; and group II, cavity prophylaxis with ultrasound for 30 seconds. The remaining steps of the adhesive and restorative procedure was the same for all groups, following the material manufacturer's recommendations. Evaluations of restorations will be carried out in periods of one week (baseline), six months, one year, two years and three years as of tooth sensitivity, integrity and color change. Data will be analyzed by McNemar and chi-square test.