Achalasia Cardia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparison of Short Versus Long Oesophageal Myotomy in Cases With Idiopathic Achalasia: A Randomized Single Blinded Trial
Aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of a short esophageal myotomy extending from 3 cm cephalad to the EGJ, to 3 cm distal to it with a long esophageal myotomy with an additional proximal extension (at least 6 cm cephalad to the EGJ, to 3 cm distal) for POEM procedures. Principle of POEM is to reduce pressure gradient across LES by Myotomy. Hypothesis is that performing short myotomy will result in similar efficacy in achalasia cardia while reducing the total time taken for the procedure and ultimately will result in less complications.
The primary goal of treatment of achalasia cardia (either LHM or POEM) is to divide the muscle at LES to reduce the pressure so that food bolus can pass down into the esophagus. However, there is little evidence regarding the optimal length of this myotomy for either procedure. During LHM the proximal length of myotomy is extended upto 6-8 cm in esophagus and distally to 3 cm in stomach. There are no data on long term outcomes between differential proximal myotomy lengths. The conventionally the esophageal myotomy is extended to 6-8 cm, this is based on technical considerations, as it is the maximum length that can safely be achieved via a laparoscopic, transhiatal approach. High pressure zone of Esophago gastric junction (EGJ) complex extends for 4 cm on an average with 2 cm on esophageal side. It is hypothesized that If shorter proximal myotomy that ablates just the EGJ complex could achieve the same normalization of EGJ physiology as a longer one, there could be several advantages to this modification. It will take less mediastinal dissection of the esophagus, potentially reducing the chances of esophageal perforation, vagal injury and pleural tears. During POEM, a shorter myotomy would allow for creation of a shorter submucosal tunnel, decreasing operative time along with potentially decreasing the incidence of mucosal perforations, pneumothorax and pneumoperitoneum. Additionally, there is chance that many patients regain some esophageal peristalsis after both LHM and POEM. Patients undergoing POEM for type 1 and type 2 Achalasia cardia will be randomised into 2 groups of short oesophageal (3 cm) and long oesophageal ( 6-8 cm) myotomy. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06189859 -
Electrosurgical Modes for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Peroral Endoscopic Esophageal Myotomy
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01793168 -
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
|
||
Completed |
NCT04951739 -
To Investigate the Incidence of Reflux in Patients After Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia Cardia Patients
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03438838 -
Randomised Trial Between LHM Alone Vs LHM With Anterior Fundoplication In Achalasia Cardia
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT06290882 -
Endoscopic Versus Robotic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05729971 -
Nasogastric Tube After Laparoscopic Heller-Dor Myotomy
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT02025790 -
POEM Versus Pneumatic Dilatation in Achalasia Cardia
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03784365 -
Single-Versus Multiple-dose Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia
|
Phase 3 |