View clinical trials related to Abscess.
Filter by:Patients who are admitted to hospital with serious infections, such as those in bone, joints or spine, require a long course of intravenous (IV) antibiotics. After an initial treatment course in hospital or through a dedicated outpatient antibiotic program many patients can complete their treatment course at home. Such infections are often caused by bacteria called Staphylococci, and currently there are three antibiotic options used routinely. A fourth antibiotic, ceftriaxone, is a promising alternative; it is also effective against Staphylococci, and is more convenient, less costly and easier to give at home, however, it has not been studied thoroughly in a prospective manner. This study will compare ceftriaxone to routinely used antibiotics (cloxacillin, cefazolin or daptomycin) to see if ceftriaxone is equally as safe and efficacious in curing deep-seated Staphylococcal infections in patients receiving home IV antibiotics. Patients with deep-seated infections caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) or coagulase-negative Staphylococcal species will be randomly assigned home IV treatment with ceftriaxone OR one of the three other antibiotics before leaving the hospital. Patients will then receive usual care from an Infectious Disease physician and Home IV team. The study team will assess whether cure has been achieved by the end of the IV treatment, follow-up at 6 months to see if patients remain infection-free, and record any side-effects of treatment. The overall goal is to determine whether ceftriaxone can be considered non-inferior to usual antibiotic treatment in treating Staphylococcal infections in a home IV setting.
The investigators aim to determine if oral antibiotics are clinically acceptable as treatment of brain abscess. Following 2 weeks of standard intravenous antibiotic therapy, half of patients will continue with this treatment for another 4 weeks or longer while the other half will be assigned to oral antibiotics for the remaining duration of treatment.
Incision and drainage (I&D) is the standard guideline treatment of uncomplicated skin abscesses (a boil or bumo beneath the skin). Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (USGNA) is a minimally invasive and less painful alternative treatment, but has not been validated as non-inferior to I&D. Multiple studies have shown successful treatment with USGNA of breast, face, neck, and/or trunk abscesses in combination with oral antibiotics with success rates as high as 97%. In 2011 Gaspari et al. published a landmark article on the use of USGNA for skin abscesses. In this randomized controlled trial, USGNA and I&D had failure rates of 74% and 20% respectively, which makes USGNA an unappealing treatment option. However, the study had several methodological issues that likely biased the results in favor of I&D, including the following: 1) aspiration was performed with an 18-gauge needle which is often too small to aspirate thick purulence (or pus); 2) failure to fully aspirate all abscess contents was a priori defined as treatment failure rather than strictly clinical outcomes; 3) the abscess aspiration procedure was not standardized; and 4) post-intervention oral antibiotic therapy was not used on all patients. The main hypothesis is that a modified protocol of the Gaspari et al. USGNA study to address these flaws will demonstrate a failure of USGNA comparable to I&D for the treatment of uncomplicated skin abscesses. First, the study will standardize the use of larger 14-gauge needle on all USGNAs. Second, USGNA intervention failure need not be defined as the inability to completely aspirate all abscess cavity contents under ultrasound guidance. Previous studies have demonstrated clinical success with USGNA of skin abscesses without applying the rigid failure criteria chosen by Gaspari et al. There is only one study in the literature to suggest that there is no correlation between a small quantity of residual abscess contents post-USGNA and ultimate clinical failure, however, there are no studies which specifically address this clinical question. In this study, initial treatment failure of USGNA will be defined as the inability to aspirate any purulent material. Third, treatment outcomes in this study will be determined by clinical resolution of abscess at the study endpoint of 7-10 days, which is a well-established timeline for anticipated abscess healing and endpoint clinical follow-up. Fourth, ultrasound fellowship-trained emergency physicians will perform USGNA in standardized fashion on all enrolled patients. Lastly, post-intervention oral antibiotic with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage will be provided and compliance closely monitored throughout the study.
Bartholin's gland abscess is a condition requiring emergency consultation. Placement of a Word catheter, which is a minor technique used in France as a treatment of bartholin's Abscess, can be done in an emergency room without hospitalization. Actually, incision-drainage, which is the most widespread treatment in France, is performed on day surgery with or without overnight hospitalization. Our hypothesis is that the use of Word catheter compared to incision-drainage would not modify the quality of life of the patients but would allow a saving of up to 3 M€ per year in France.
Establish the repertoire of bacteria and Archaea responsible for brain abscesses. Correlate the microbial repertoire to epidemiological, clinical and radiological data; to define the different nosological entities falling within the framework of cerebral abscesses.
Liver abscess is purulent collections in the liver parenchyma that result from microbial infection spread to the liver through the biliary tree, hepatic or portal vein and by extension of adjacent infection or as a result of trauma. Liver abscesses are most commonly pyogenic followed by amoebic and rarely tuberculous or fungal in immunocompromised patients. In the developing country amoebic liver abscess is more frequent than the developed country but secondary bacterial infection of amoebic liver abscess and polymicrobial pyogenic liver abscess are also common. Pyogenic liver abscess is commonly a polymicrobial infection caused by mixed enteric facultative and anaerobic pathogens. The most commonly isolated organisms are Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Streptococcus constellatus, Streptococcus anginosus, Streptococcus intermedius, Enterococcus and anaerobes, including Bacteroidesfragilis and Fusobacteriumnecrophorum. Amoebic liver abscess most frequently occur following infection with the parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Liver abscess is a common medical emergency. Prompt empirical antimicrobial with or without percutaneous aspiration or drainage of the abscess is therapeutic. An empiric antimicrobial regimen for liver abscess should cover enteric gram-negative bacilli, streptococci, anaerobes and antamoebahistolytica. Presently a Fluoroquinolone (Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin) or a Third or Fourth generation Cefalosporine (Cefixime, Ceftriaxone, cefepime) or a Beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination (piperacillin-tazobactam or ticarcillin-clavulanate) or a Carbapenem (Imipenem-cilastatin, Meropenem, Doripenem, Ertapenem) are being used in combination with or without Metronidazole as the empirical antimicrobial regime for the treatment live abscess. There is no randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluated and compare efficacy of the antimicrobial regimens for the treatment of liver abscess as well as there is no specific treatment guideline for the use of empirical antibiotics. There is also no definite proven rational for using Cefalosporine, Beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination or Carbapenem upfront, not using Fluoroquinolone in empirical antibiotic regimen for the treatment of liver abscess. Injudicious use of broader spectrum antibiotics may also lead to rise in antibiotic resistance in future. Both ciprofloxacin and Cefixime are effective oral antibiotics as they are well-absorbed orally with good oral bioavailability and achieve plasma concentration well above the minimal inhibitory concentrations require for the killing of the microorganism. Using intravenous (IV) antibiotics upfront, for the treatment of liver abscess in patients who can take orally may unnecessary increase the duration of hospital stay, healthcare burden and the cost of therapy, as well as the risk of hospital acquired infection. So the investigators have planned this randomized controlled double blind study to evaluate the efficacy of empirical Ciprofloxacin plus Metronidazole and Cefixime plus Metronidazole therapy for the treatment of liver abscess and to compare the outcomes of two different empirical antibiotics regimen.
Sarcopaenia is associated with poor prognoses of in-hospital mortality in splenic abscess patients. Investigators recommend its use by surgeons in the ED to rapidly risk stratify and identify patients requiring urgent and aggressive intervention, to maximise patient outcomes and survival chances.
Operative site infection remains the most common complication after performing a gynecological procedure, and has a great implication in the morbidity and mortality of patients. Gynecological procedures, including laparoscopic hysterectomy, represent a unique challenge due to the amount of microorganisms found at the skin level of the vagina or the endocervix. However, there is no clear evidence that the complication decreases with the use of postoperative antibiotics. With the completion of this study, a multicentre triple-blind controlled randomized controlled trial is intended to determine the behavior of the application of this intervention. Patients who attend an outpatient clinic with benign pathology will be selected, in which indication of laparoscopic hysterectomy, consents are completed and research content is widely explained. Prior to surgery, the sample is taken for a gram of vaginal discharge and in the post-surgical phase delivery of the medication will be performed. Follow-up will be carried out by surgical control and by telephone. The investigator intend to find that with the prophylaxis not only of presurgical cephalosporin, but with the formulation of metronidazole ovules in the postoperative, the incidence of laparoscopic post-hysterectomy vaginal abscess and cellulitis of cuff is reduced.
This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of loop drainage versus traditional incision and drainage in adult patients presenting to the emergency department.
This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of intranasal fentanyl to placebo as analgesic adjunct to conventional local anesthesia for the treatment of pain of the overall procedure in adult patients undergoing lidocaine infiltration and subsequent abscess incision and drainage in the Emergency Department (ED).