View clinical trials related to Abscess.
Filter by:This is a single center non-blinded randomized trial of topical anesthetic cream to usual care (warm compresses and time) for superficial, non-perianal abscesses in children under 18 years of age. The primary outcome is time to spontaneous drainage. The secondary outcomes are return to emergency room/hospital/care provider and need for incision and drainage. Information on patient experience using standardized patient reported outcome measures for health-related quality of life will also be gathered. The findings of this study will provide more robust evidence of the benefit of this treatment including a potential reduction in cost and allow for more widespread dissemination.
When using the rolled ring of a sterile glove as a loop drain in incision and loop drainage, is it superior to incision and drainage for treatment of a cutaneous abscess in 18 to 65 year-old patients presenting to the Emergency Department, Family Health Clinic, Family Medicine Residency Clinic, or Internal Medicine Clinic? Hypothesis: When treating a cutaneous abscess, incision and loop drainage utilizing the rolled ring of a sterile glove as a loop drain is superior to the standard (incision and drainage) yielding a treatment failure rate of 1% at seven to ten days.
This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial of loop drainage versus traditional incision and drainage in adult patients presenting to the emergency department.
Several breast diseases can complicate breastfeeding : 4% of women develop a mastitis and 1% develop an abscess. The study deals with cases of breast abscess that have been treated according to a defined protocol (Parisian Perinatal Health Network), by a multidisciplinary team (center of Medical Imaging Duroc) trained in breastfeeding and ultrasound-guided punctures. The aim of the study is to define the risk factors for the onset of a breast abscess, to evaluate the indications and methods of management of abscess by ultrasound puncture, and to provide arguments motivating the continuation of breastfeeding.
This will be a randomized control trial. All patients for whom an emergency provider determines that abscess drainage or laceration repair are necessary will be considered for enrollment. The provider must be willing to participate in the study and be certified to use Nitrous oxide. The investigators providers completed a training course to be certified to use Nitrous oxide. The patient must be age 18 or greater, consent to participate in the study, and be able to complete a satisfaction survey. If the patient states there is a possibility of pregnancy, the investigators will regress to our standard of care and perform a urine pregnancy test. Patients with a first trimester pregnancy will be excluded. Patients who agree to enroll in the study will be randomized to Nitrous oxide versus oxygen (to be administered through the same system), and will complete a survey after the procedure, as will the provider. There will be a separate block randomization for each procedure. Providers may select other agents of choice for analgesia/sedation, such as local anesthesia, and pain medications, based on their clinical judgment. If the patient appears to have inadequate analgesia during the procedure, the provider can elect to treat as is typically done (pain medications or local anesthetics) at their discretion. The survey will ask patients to give a self-reported pain score before and during their procedure (both to be completed after the procedure). It will also ask the patient/guardian and provider for a satisfaction level with the analgesia during the procedure. In addition, side effects and procedure start and stop time will also be documented. In addition to the survey, the investigators will document clinical characteristics including diagnosis, size of laceration or abscess, additional medications required and dosages, comorbidities, age, and gender. Other data that will be gathered will include which adjunctive analgesics/anesthetics were used.
Patients presenting with painful procedures in the Emergency Department (ED) have been shown to frequently have inadequate pain management. The incision and drainage (I&D) of an abscess is a common procedure that is viewed by many emergency physicians as only requiring a localized anesthetic for pain management. However, it has been documented in previous research that there can be disconnect between what emergency medicine physicians interpret as painful and what patients experience as pain. A trial will be conducted to focus on use of intramuscular (IM) Fentanyl as an intervention to help alleviate pain associated with the incision and drainage of an abscess. This is a procedure that rarely receives systemic opioids. This double blinded protocol will randomize a total of 50 patients patients with abscesses to receive either a combination of Fentanyl IM followed by subcutaneous (SC) local bupivicaine analgesia or Normal Saline IM followed by SC local bupivicaine analgesia. Only opiate naive patients will be enrolled. The primary outcomes studied are patients overall satisfaction with procedure, and patients level of pain associated with the procedure.
This study aims to look at the necessity for prescribing antibiotics post-drainage of peritonsillar abscesses (PTA). This will be a single-blinded randomized-control trial with two arms - patients receiving placebo versus those receiving a seven day course of oral Amoxicillin-Clavulanic acid. The main objective measure will be to assess if there is resolution of the peri-tonsillar abscess and there has been no reaccumulation. Patients will be blinded to whether they receive placebo or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Patients will be phoned after 7 days to assess if their symptoms have resolved via an over the phone questionnaire. Anaerobic and aerobic cultures will be obtained.
Adult patients presenting to the emergency department with superficial cutaneous abscesses will be randomized after incision and drainage to standard care with wound packing or no packing to determine if there is a difference in the proportion of complications between the two groups.
Background: Skin abscesses are a growing problem in the general pediatric population around the world. While the standard treatment for an abscess/boil is incision and drainage, many physicians also prescribe antibiotics, despite the lack of evidence that antibiotics are necessary to help the wound heal. The purpose of this research study is to determine whether antibiotics are necessary after incision and drainage of a skin abscess in children. This is an important question because medical evidence has shown that using antibiotics when they are not needed has contributed to the increase of bacterial antibiotic resistance. In fact, several of the antibiotics that successfully killed Staph bacteria several years ago are now no longer effective because of antibiotic resistance. Now resistant forms of Staph bacteria, called "Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staph Aureus" (CA-MRSA), account for 50-85% of all pediatric skin abscesses. If antibiotics are not necessary then withholding them when appropriate may help slow the progression of antibiotic-resistant Staph infections. Objective(s) and Hypothesis(es): The investigators believe that antibiotics are no better than placebo at achieving a cure after drainage of an abscess in a child. The objective of this study is to answer the question: Do antibiotics after abscess drainage result in a better chance of cure than placebo? Potential Impact: If abscess drainage alone is shown to be as effective as drainage followed by antibiotics, then the routine use of antibiotics for this problem could be avoided. This would help limit the increasing antibiotic resistance of bacteria (especially CA-MRSA) in communities around the world. A well-designed study may provide the evidence to change the way children are treated for abscesses in a future where antibiotic resistant bacteria will be even more of a public health challenge.