Oscillatory Contributions to Working Memory and Attention

Young Adults Clinical Trial

Official title: Oscillatory Contributions to Working Memory and Attention

Status Completed

Clinical Trial Summary

The objectives are articulated in the proposal's specific aims: Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that the cognitive control of unattended memory items (UMI) is implemented by the same frontoparietal mechanisms that control spatial and nonspatial attention. Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that the selection of visual stimuli, whether from the environment or from WM, is accomplished, in part, by the hijacking of low-frequency oscillatory dynamics that are fundamental to the waking-state physiology of the corticothalamic circuitry of the visual system. Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that the function of context binding contributes to delay-period activity of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC).

Clinical Trial Description

4.2.a Narrative Study Description There are 11 distinct experiments proposed, and each is described in turn. Experiment 1.a.: Unconfounding cognitive state from the passage of time for UMI reactivation This experiment entails recording the EEG, and delivering spTMS, while healthy young adult subjects perform two types of WM trials: dual serial retrocuing (DSR) trials and single-retrocue trials. DSR trials begin with the presentation of two items (drawn from categories face, motion, word), followed by an initial Delay 1.1, then Cue 1 indicating which of the two will be probed by the first memory probe. After Probe 1, Cue 2 indicates which item will be tested by Probe 2. Both trial types will feature 3 types of probe: match (50% of trials); nonmatch/same-category (drawn from same category as retrocued sample, 30% of trials); and nonmatch/lure (probe is the uncued item, 20% of trials. spTMS will also be delivered, unpredictably on half of the delay periods, to IPS2. Prospective power analysis, using the results from PMC 5221753 (and taking into account that Exp. 1.a., unlike PMC 5221753, will use a repeated measures design), indicates that 360 trials per subject, and 12 subjects, are required to achieve 80% power for the critical behavioral comparison, which is the comparative influence of spTMS on the FAR to nonmatch/lure probes for dual serial- vs. single-retrocue trials, assessed with the contrast [(FAR nonmatch/lure, dual - FARnonmatch/same-category, dual) - (FAR nonmatch/lure, single - FARnonmatch/same-category, single)]. (To balance the number of match and nonmatch probes, there will be a total of 720 trials per subject.) Each subject will participate in two 2.5-hr experimental sessions. (Allowing for 15% attrition inflates the target n from 12 to 14.) Exp. 2.a. spTMS/EEG of the frontoparietal salience map. Study PMC 4893488 used n of 17 to achieve reliable single-trial regression results, which are least-powered analyses planned with this dataset; 18 subjects will allow for same number of subjects per targeted hemisphere. From the perspective of counterbalancing order of region targeted with spTMS, 12 subjects would be needed (2 hemispheres * 6 possible orders); once the 12 counterbalancing cells have been filled, the remaining 6 subjects will be selected two-at-a-time, and assigned the same randomly selected order-of-region, one to each hemisphere). (Allowing for 15% attrition inflates the target n from 18 to 21.) Exp. 2.b. 1 Hz rTMS of the frontoparietal salience map. Study PMC 5725229 recruited 27 subjects, based on its own power analysis based on the literature, to use a rTMS procedure comparable to what Exp. 2.b. will use to disrupt the function of PFC, one of the regions that will be targeted in this study. Because several previous studies using TMS to study attentional selection have found evidence of hemispheric asymmetries in the control of spatial attention, 27 subjects per hemisphere to be targeted will be recruited, yielding a total of 54. (Allowing for 15% attrition inflates the target n from 54 to 62.) Exp. 2.c.1 Hz rTMS of FEF and IFJ. Considerations are identical to those for Exp. 2.b. Experiment 3.a. Studying alpha-band dynamics of spatial and temporal attention with EEG. Study PMC 4500270 found reliable effects of temporal prediction-related frequency-shifting in the alpha band with 15 subjects. Sixteen (16) subjects will be recruited in order to achieve equal counterbalancing. (Allowing for 15% attrition inflates the target n from 16 to 18.) Exp. 4.a. Strategic control of alpha-band dynamics for perceptually unchallenging visual selection. Considerations are identical to those for Exp. 3.a. Exp. 4.b. Strategic control of alpha-band dynamics for selection in visual WM. Considerations are identical to those for Exp. 3.a. Experiment 5 (addressing Aim 3). Testing WM storage vs. context binding accounts of the CDA Power analyses, carried out with resampling of simulated data derived from the preliminary results of this study, indicate that 36 subjects are needed for 90% power to detect a load effect (i.e., CDA for 3C trials > CDA for 1C trials). (Allowing for 15% attrition inflates the target n from 36 to 41.) Experiment 6 (addressing Aim 3). Varying the domain of context. Considerations are identical to those for Exp. 5. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Young Adults

• NCT number: NCT03787134
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: University of Wisconsin, Madison
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: March 1, 2019
• Completion date: April 21, 2023