Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT02062866
Other study ID # 407301
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received November 1, 2013
Last updated April 15, 2015
Start date April 2013
Est. completion date February 2015

Study information

Verified date April 2015
Source University of California, Davis
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To compare healing time, scar size, aesthetic outcome, and complication rates following second intention healing or purse string closure of surgical wounds on the trunk or extremities. This study, will allow surgeons to make informed decisions on whether purse string closure is superior to that of second intention healing and thus worth considering or inferior and not worth performing.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 50
Est. completion date February 2015
Est. primary completion date February 2015
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Over 18 years of age

- Able to give informed consent themselves

- Willing to return for follow-up visits

- Post-operative defects greater than 8 mm (in greatest diameter or length of circular or oval geometric shape) on the trunk and extremities (including the shin, hands, and feet)

Exclusion Criteria:

- Mentally handicapped

- Unable to understand written and oral English

- Incarceration

- Under 18 years of age

- Unwilling to return for follow-up

- Pregnant women

- Wounds less than 8 mm in length

- Wounds on the head, neck or digits

- Patients in which primary linear closure is recommended

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Supportive Care


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Purse-String
The wound will be closed using one, long, continuous suture which will enter and exit run through the skin along the inner edge of the wound. The start and stopping point will be adjacent to one another. The suture will then be pulled" on either side to essentially cinch down the wound, decreasing the size of the wound.
Second Intent
The wound will not be sutured, and allowed to heal on its own.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of California-Davis, Dept. of Dermatology Sacramento California

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of California, Davis

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Assessment of Scar on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale After surgical procedure, subjects will be randomized into one of two wound healing groups: by second intention (no sutures) or by purse-string closure (with sutures). After 3 months, subjects will return to clinic for evaluation of the pain scale and cosmesis of both types of healing techniques. 3 months No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Active, not recruiting NCT02991755 - Use of 5-0 Prolene Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure N/A
Completed NCT02383186 - Dermal Suturing Only Versus Layered Cutaneous Closure N/A
Completed NCT02289859 - Undermining During Cutaneous Wound Closure N/A
Withdrawn NCT01352533 - Closure Techniques and Scar Appearance N/A
Completed NCT02547077 - Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure N/A
Completed NCT02550574 - Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate With Full-thickness Skin Grafts N/A