Wound Closure Techniques Clinical Trial
Official title:
Intradermal Purse-String Closure Vs Second Intention Healing
Verified date | April 2015 |
Source | University of California, Davis |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Study type | Interventional |
To compare healing time, scar size, aesthetic outcome, and complication rates following second intention healing or purse string closure of surgical wounds on the trunk or extremities. This study, will allow surgeons to make informed decisions on whether purse string closure is superior to that of second intention healing and thus worth considering or inferior and not worth performing.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 50 |
Est. completion date | February 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | February 2015 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Over 18 years of age - Able to give informed consent themselves - Willing to return for follow-up visits - Post-operative defects greater than 8 mm (in greatest diameter or length of circular or oval geometric shape) on the trunk and extremities (including the shin, hands, and feet) Exclusion Criteria: - Mentally handicapped - Unable to understand written and oral English - Incarceration - Under 18 years of age - Unwilling to return for follow-up - Pregnant women - Wounds less than 8 mm in length - Wounds on the head, neck or digits - Patients in which primary linear closure is recommended |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of California-Davis, Dept. of Dermatology | Sacramento | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University of California, Davis |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Assessment of Scar on the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale | After surgical procedure, subjects will be randomized into one of two wound healing groups: by second intention (no sutures) or by purse-string closure (with sutures). After 3 months, subjects will return to clinic for evaluation of the pain scale and cosmesis of both types of healing techniques. | 3 months | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02991755 -
Use of 5-0 Prolene Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02383186 -
Dermal Suturing Only Versus Layered Cutaneous Closure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02289859 -
Undermining During Cutaneous Wound Closure
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT01352533 -
Closure Techniques and Scar Appearance
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02547077 -
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus 5-0 Fast Absorbing Gut During Cutaneous Wound Closure
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02550574 -
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate With Full-thickness Skin Grafts
|
N/A |