The Effect of Spinal Manipulation on Hip Extension Strength and Jump Height

Weakness, Muscle Clinical Trial

Official title:

The Effect of Spinal Manipulation on Hip Extension Strength and Jump Height, A Double Blind Randomized Control Trial

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05689723
• Other study ID #: Bergmann
• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 2023
• Est. completion date: October 2023

Study information

• Verified date: October 2022
• Source: Messiah College
• Contact: Karl Bergmann, ScD
• Phone: 717-796-1800
• Email: kbergmann[@]messiah.edu
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this study is to study the effects of lumbar manipulation on hip extension strength and jump height in healthy subjects. Procedures to be followed: First, the subject will be asked to complete a medical history form. Then they will be instructed on the procedure for strength and jump testing. Next, range of motion of the low back will be measured. Then hip strength will be measured using a digital handheld measurement tool. The subject will then be asked to jump as high as they can on a floor mat. The subject will then receive a sealed envelope indicating the intervention they will to receive, either the manipulation or a fake manipulation. Instructions will be provided, and the subject will be positioned on a treatment table to receive the intervention. At this point, they will either receive the manipulation or fake manipulation on the right and left side. An immediate re-test of hip strength will be taken, and the subject will again jump as high as they can on a floor mat. Follow-up measures of these tests will be completed again 20 minutes after the intervention is given.

Description:

The participant will complete a medical history form and undergo a brief active range of motion screen of the lumbar spine. The participant will complete a hip strength test utilizing the microFET 2 Manual Muscle Tester Hand Held Dynamometer. The participant will then jump as high as they can on the Just Jump System. A sealed envelope indicating the intervention to be received will be given to the participant. An investigator blinded to the pre and post-measures will open the envelope indicating the intervention to be performed. The participant will be blinded to which intervention group they are categorized to. The participant will be positioned on a high-low treatment table to receive the assigned intervention, either intervention 1 (thrust mobilization) or 2 (sham mobilization). The participant will either receive the thrust-mobilization or sham mobilization up to 2 times on the left and right side. An immediate re-test of hip strength will be conducted followed by performing the same three jumps. Follow-up measures at 20 minutes post-intervention will be performed. Intervention for the Thrust-mobilization Group The intervention group will receive passive spinal rotational grade V mobilization, based on Maitland's approach. The intervention will be performed with the subject in right sidelying and left sidelying. The operator's palpating hand is placed over the L2-3 intervertebral space, and the other hand bends both legs of the participant up to the range at which the L2-3 midposition is found. The participant is then asked to straighten the lower leg and hook the upper leg over it with the upper leg's knee positioned over the side of the plinth. While the lower component is kept still, the participant's trunk is rotated until the hip starts to lift off from the plinth. The bottom hand and uppermost hand rest under a pillow and the chest wall, respectively. With the starting position settled, the operator stands behind the participant, takes up the slack within the spine and then provides a grade V mobilization while stabilizing the uppermost shoulder. Intervention for the Sham Group Subjects are positioned in right sidelying. The experimenter holds both knees with one arm while placing their opposite hand on the participant's lumbar spine. The experimenter performs 1 min of flexion and extension PROM without reaching physiological end range in either direction of movement. This is repeated with the subject in left sidelying. Double Blind: The subjects will not know what intervention they are receiving - same generic script is provided. One Investigator is performing all pre and post-tests without knowledge of intervention, the other investigator is opening the envelope and providing the intervention behind a screen without knowledge of test results. This investigator will record the subjects assigned # and which intervention they received. Investigators will record data on spreadsheet separately.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Not yet recruiting
• Enrollment: 44
• Est. completion date: October 2023
• Est. primary completion date: October 2023
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 30 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Between the ages of 18 and 30
• able to read and write in English and clearly understand the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

• currently have low back pain
• pregnant or may be pregnant
• previously diagnosed with spondylolisthesis, a herniated disc, or have signs and symptoms of nerve root compression
• history of spine surgery
• history of cancer, compression fracture, osteoporosis, osteopenia, or a history of systemic, connective tissue, or neurological disease,
• pain with the pre-manipulative hold
• positive findings on medical history form, or physical exam,
• presence of anxiety during the procedure

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Muscle Weakness
• Weakness, Muscle

Intervention

Procedure:
• Lumbar manipulation
Left and right sidelyiing gaping high velocity low amplitude thrust mobilization
• Sham Manipulation
The experimenter holds both knees with one arm while placing their opposite hand on the participant's lumbar spine. The experimenter performs 1 min of ?exion and extension PROM without reaching physiological end range in either direction of movement. This is repeated with the subject in left sidelying.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
n/a

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Messiah College

References & Publications (14)

Bergman GJ, Winter JC, van Tulder MW, Meyboom-de Jong B, Postema K, van der Heijden GJ. Manipulative therapy in addition to usual medical care accelerates recovery of shoulder complaints at higher costs: economic outcomes of a randomized trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Sep 6;11:200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-200. — View Citation

Botelho MB, Alvarenga BAP, Molina N, Ribas M, Baptista AF. Spinal Manipulative Therapy and Sports Performance Enhancement: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Sep;40(7):535-543. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.03.014. — View Citation

Espi-Lopez GV, Arnal-Gomez A, Balasch-Bernat M, Ingles M. Effectiveness of Manual Therapy Combined With Physical Therapy in Treatment of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: Systematic Review. J Chiropr Med. 2017 Jun;16(2):139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Nov 22. — View Citation

Grindstaff TL, Hertel J, Beazell JR, Magrum EM, Ingersoll CD. Effects of lumbopelvic joint manipulation on quadriceps activation and strength in healthy individuals. Man Ther. 2009 Aug;14(4):415-20. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Sep 20. — View Citation

Grindstaff TL, Hertel J, Beazell JR, Magrum EM, Kerrigan DC, Fan X, Ingersoll CD. Lumbopelvic joint manipulation and quadriceps activation of people with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Athl Train. 2012 Jan-Feb;47(1):24-31. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-47.1.24. — View Citation

McDevitt A, Young J, Mintken P, Cleland J. Regional interdependence and manual therapy directed at the thoracic spine. J Man Manip Ther. 2015 Jul;23(3):139-46. doi: 10.1179/2042618615Y.0000000005. — View Citation

Mintken PE, McDevitt AW, Cleland JA, Boyles RE, Beardslee AR, Burns SA, Haberl MD, Hinrichs LA, Michener LA. Cervicothoracic Manual Therapy Plus Exercise Therapy Versus Exercise Therapy Alone in the Management of Individuals With Shoulder Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Aug;46(8):617-28. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6319. — View Citation

Pickar JG. Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation. Spine J. 2002 Sep-Oct;2(5):357-71. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00400-x. — View Citation

Sandell J, Palmgren PJ, Bjorndahl L. Effect of chiropractic treatment on hip extension ability and running velocity among young male running athletes. J Chiropr Med. 2008 Jun;7(2):39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcme.2008.02.003. — View Citation

Sanders GD, Nitz AJ, Abel MG, Symons TB, Shapiro R, Black WS, Yates JW. Effects of Lumbosacral Manipulation on Isokinetic Strength of the Knee Extensors and Flexors in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized, Controlled, Single-Blind Crossover Trial. J Chiropr Med. 2015 Dec;14(4):240-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Nov 6. — View Citation

Stupar M, Cote P, French MR, Hawker GA. The association between low back pain and osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: a population-based cohort study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2010 Jun;33(5):349-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.05.008. — View Citation

Sueki DG, Cleland JA, Wainner RS. A regional interdependence model of musculoskeletal dysfunction: research, mechanisms, and clinical implications. J Man Manip Ther. 2013 May;21(2):90-102. doi: 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000027. — View Citation

Wainner RS, Whitman JM, Cleland JA, Flynn TW. Regional interdependence: a musculoskeletal examination model whose time has come. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Nov;37(11):658-60. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.0110. No abstract available. — View Citation

Yuen TS, Lam PY, Lau MY, Siu WL, Yu KM, Lo CN, Ng J. Changes in Lower Limb Strength and Function Following Lumbar Spinal Mobilization. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Oct;40(8):587-596. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.07.003. Erratum In: J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2018 Jan 6;: — View Citation

* Note: There are 14 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Change in hip extension strength	microFET 2 Manual Muscle Tester Hand Held Dynamometer	immediately post instervention and 20 minutes post
Secondary	Change in jump height	Just Jump System	immediately post instervention and 20 minutes post