View clinical trials related to Warts.
Filter by:To evaluate drug safety and efficacy in patients treated with Nowarta110 and to determine therapeutic activity against Plantar Warts - Clinical Tolerance - Clinical Recovery - Evaluate Safety
A phase 2, randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind study to assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics (PD) of topically applied CLS003 in otherwise healthy patients with cutaneous warts.
Background: - WHIMS (Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections, and Myelokathexis Syndrome) is a rare disease. It can cause cancers, infections, and warts. Researchers want to see if a drug called plerixafor can treat WHIMS. Objective: - To compare plerixafor versus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for preventing infections in people with WHIMS. Eligibility: - People ages 10-75 with WHIMS who have a CXCR4 gene mutation. Design: - Participants will be screened with a medical history, physical exam, and blood and urine tests. They may have heart and spleen tests and body scans. They may have samples of skin or warts taken. Researchers may take photographs of warts. - Participants will start twice daily self-injections of G-CSF. Their doctors will decide the dosage. - Initial Period (4-12 weeks) - Participants will: - continue the injections and their usual antibiotics and/or immunoglobulin - have blood drawn - keep a daily health diary - Participants will visit the clinic for 2 days without injections. - Adjustment Period 1 (8 weeks): - Participants will: - continue twice daily injections from home - continue the daily health diary - have blood tests every 2 weeks. - Treatment Year 1: - Participants will - receive either plerixafor or G-CSF injections twice daily - continue the health diary - have blood tests every 2 months - visit the clinic about every 4 months - At the end of year 1, participants will visit the clinic for an evaluation. They will switch to the other study drug. They will have an 8-week adjustment and 1-year treatment period. - At the end of year 2, participants will visit the clinic to complete their injections and go back to their previous G-CSF regimen. Participants will continue their daily health diary and have blood tests for 5-6 months.
Plantar warts can be bothersome and painful requiring treatment. The investigators will compare the efficacy of pyruvic acid and salicylic acid in treating multiple plantar warts. Patients with multiple plantar warts will be randomized to receive either pyruvic acid 70% or compound salicylic acid solution (salicylic acid 16.7%, lactic acid 16.7%, and collodion 100%) applying topically twice a day for 4 weeks. Patients will be visited every 2 weeks for one month after starting treatment and then every one month for up to 3 months. The number and size of warts will be evaluated.
External Genital Warts (EGW) are the most common sexually transmitted disease associated with more than 30 types of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV). Cryotherapy is an effective method of EGW treatment. However, multiple sessions may be required with reported clearance rates ranging between 27-88%. Sinecatechins 15% ointment is Food and Drug Administration approved for three times daily application in immunocompetent subjects 18 years and older for the treatment of EGW and perianal warts. Treatment of EGW with cryotherapy followed by sinecatechins appears to be logical. Cryotherapy has direct cytodestructive effects with immediate short-term efficacy on treated EGW, while sinecatechins provide field therapy, treating both clinical and sub-clinical lesions. For this study, the investigators used sinecatechins 15% ointment twice daily regimen and anticipated that the synergistic effect with cryotherapy will provide better efficacy that cryotherapy alone. The investigators also anticipated that the sequential therapy with be safe.
This phase I/IIa study has an open-label, First-in-Human (FIH), single center design to assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of multiple doses of topically applied CLS003 in healthy subjects with cutaneous warts.
Objective To assess the efficacy of the topical application of Nitric Oxide, delivered using acidified nitrite. Design Multicentre, randomized, controlled, dose ranging trial. A control arm and three doses of acidified nitrite applied topically for 12 weeks with a further 12 weeks of follow up. Setting The trial setting was in European genitourinary medicine clinics Participants Male and female volunteers over 18 years of age with between 2 and 50 ano-genital warts, 328 were screened for eligibility and 299 subjects from 40 centres were randomised. Exclusions Pregnancy; concomitant Sexually Transmitted Disease; internal warts requiring treatment other than surgery /laser; diabetes ; Human Immunodeficiency Virus-positive, immunosuppressed and/or using immunosuppressive therapies; drug abuse. interventions compared - Control Placebo nitrite cream and placebo citric acid cream twice daily - A) 3% sodium nitrite + 4.5% citric acid creams twice daily - B) 6% sodium nitrite + 9% citric acid creams once daily - C) 6% sodium nitrite + 9% citric acid creams twice daily Outcomes - Primary proportion of patients with complete clearance of target warts Secondary - Time to clearance - Wart area - Wart count - Patient and investigator assessment of efficacy - Safety - Tolerability - Adherence
The purpose of this double blind study is to determine whether topical 15% AS101 gel is effective and safe as compared to vehicle in the treatment of external genital warts in women.
The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of laser versus cryotherapy on the treatment of warts
To evaluate the efficacy of SR-T100 gel by observing total clearance rate of treated baseline EGW(s) on the treated area.