Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04876235
Other study ID # 2021-03-221
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date May 1, 2021
Est. completion date December 31, 2022

Study information

Verified date February 2023
Source First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Walled-off necrosis (WON) is defined as an encapsulated collection of solid and liquid necrotic material that is usually formed 4 weeks after an episode of acute necrotizing pancreatitis. As the advances in endoscopic techniques and accessories, Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has evolved to become the treatment of choice for symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of a double mushroom head metal stent and a double pigtail plastic stent in the treatment of encapsulated necrosis of the pancreas.


Description:

According to the revised Atlanta classification, pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) include acute peripancreatic fluid collections(APFCs) and acute necrotic collections(ANCs), which, over time, turn into pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). Drainage of these PP and WON is required when they increase in size and become infected or become symptomatic. Traditionally, WON has been managed surgically, however, surgical necrosectomy is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly when pursued early. In recent years, with the development of minimally invasive techniques, Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has evolved to become the treatment of choice for symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). Double-pigtail plastic stents(DPPS) is the earliest stent used for WON drainage in ultrasound endoscopy, however, These stents are limited by their small diameter leading to increased risk of stent obstruction. Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been increasingly used because of the advantage of better lumen apposition and wider diameter, improving access for endoscopic debridement. However, more adverse events(AEs) such as bleeding have been reported. This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of DPPS and LAMS in the treatment of Walled-off necrosis


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 50
Est. completion date December 31, 2022
Est. primary completion date December 31, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Obtention of a written informed consent - According to Revised Atlanta Classification, abdominal CT/MRI and EUS were diagnosed as WON - The diameter of WON =6cm - Patient capable of fill in the quality of life questionnaire - The distance between the EUS-probe and WON was < 1 cm. Exclusion Criteria: - No written informed consent - pancreatic cystic tumor, pancreatic cancer and other benign and malignant tumors - pancreatic pseudocyst - WON too far from the stomach and duodenum to perform endoscopic drainage - Serious abnormalities in liver and kidney function and coagulation function - Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
endoscopic ultrasound
All patients were implanted with stents(DPPS or LAMS)under the EUS
Device:
lumen-apposing metal stent
In the LAMS group, patients were stented with LAMS
double-pigtail plastic stents
In the DPPS group, patients were stented with DPPS

Locations

Country Name City State
China Jianfeng Yang Hangzhou Zhejiang

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
First People's Hospital of Hangzhou

Country where clinical trial is conducted

China, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary clinical success (clinical improvement and resolution of WON) compare rates of WON resolution in patients with LAMS and DPPS for treatment of walled-off necrosis two months
Secondary Adverse Events Number of participants with adverse events; type, frequency and intensity of adverse events two months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05451901 - Immediate Necrosectomy vs. Step-up Approach for Walled-off Necrosis N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04963868 - Timing of Transmural Stent Removal in Necrotizing Pancreatitis N/A
Withdrawn NCT02718092 - Comparing Fully Covered, Self Expanding Metal Stent (FCSEMS) and Plastic Stents for EUS- Guided Drainage of WON N/A