Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04876235 |
Other study ID # |
2021-03-221 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
May 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
December 31, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
February 2023 |
Source |
First People's Hospital of Hangzhou |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Walled-off necrosis (WON) is defined as an encapsulated collection of solid and liquid
necrotic material that is usually formed 4 weeks after an episode of acute necrotizing
pancreatitis. As the advances in endoscopic techniques and accessories, Endoscopic ultrasound
(EUS)-guided transluminal drainage has evolved to become the treatment of choice for
symptomatic pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). This article aims to compare the efficacy
and safety of a double mushroom head metal stent and a double pigtail plastic stent in the
treatment of encapsulated necrosis of the pancreas.
Description:
According to the revised Atlanta classification, pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) include
acute peripancreatic fluid collections(APFCs) and acute necrotic collections(ANCs), which,
over time, turn into pancreatic pseudocysts (PPs) and walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON).
Drainage of these PP and WON is required when they increase in size and become infected or
become symptomatic.
Traditionally, WON has been managed surgically, however, surgical necrosectomy is associated
with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly when pursued early. In recent years,
with the development of minimally invasive techniques, Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided
transluminal drainage has evolved to become the treatment of choice for symptomatic
pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON).
Double-pigtail plastic stents(DPPS) is the earliest stent used for WON drainage in ultrasound
endoscopy, however, These stents are limited by their small diameter leading to increased
risk of stent obstruction. Recently, lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have been
increasingly used because of the advantage of better lumen apposition and wider diameter,
improving access for endoscopic debridement. However, more adverse events(AEs) such as
bleeding have been reported.
This article aims to compare the efficacy and safety of DPPS and LAMS in the treatment of
Walled-off necrosis