Waiting List Control Group Clinical Trial
— TAOOfficial title:
Efficacy of an Internet-based CBT Program for Adjustment Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Verified date | September 2018 |
Source | Universitat Jaume I |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of a self-help
treatment for adjustment disorders administered through a computerized program applied over
the Internet. This treatment modality will be compared with a waiting list control group.
It is expected that, on the one side, the intervention group will improve significantly
compared to the waiting list control group. On the other side, it is expected the
self-applied online treatment program to be well accepted and valued by the patient.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 68 |
Est. completion date | July 2019 |
Est. primary completion date | June 2019 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 65 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Be between 18 and 65 years of age. - Meet DSM-V (APA, 2013) criteria for Adjustment Disorder. - Be able to understand and read Spanish. - Be able to use a computer and have an Internet connection at home. - Have an e-mail address. - If having any medication, not change the drug or the dose during the treatment period. Exclusion Criteria: - Be receiving other psychological treatment. - Meet criteria for other severe mental disorder on Axis I: abuse or dependence of alcohol or other substances, psychotic disorder, dementia or bipolar disorder. - Meet criteria for a severe personality disorder or illness. - Presence of risk of suicide or self-destructive behaviors. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Spain | Universitat Jaume I | Castelló de la Plana |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Universitat Jaume I | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Spain |
Spain,
Baños RM, Guillén V, Quero S, García-Palacios A, Alcañiz M, Botella C. A virtual reality system for the treatment of stress-related disorders: A preliminary analysis of efficacy compared to a standard cognitive behavioral program. Int J Hum Comput Stud 69: 602-13, 2011.
Botella C, Baños RM, Guillén V. Una propuesta de tratamiento para los trastornos adaptativos: Creciendo en la adversidad. In: Vázquez C, Hervás G, eds. Psicología Positiva aplicada. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer; 2008: 129-154.
Molés M. Eficacia diferencial de dos formas de aplicación de las tareas para casa en el tratamiento de los Trastornos Adaptativos: Aplicación apoyada por las TICs versus aplicación de forma tradicional [dissertation]. Castellón de la Plana, Spain: Universitat Jaume I; 2016.
Quero S, Andreu-Mateu S, Baños RM, Guillén V, Molés M, Botella C. Eficacia de un protocolo de tratamiento apoyado con realidad virtual para el tratamiento de los trastornos adaptativos: Un estudio controlado. Paper presented at: I Congreso Nacional de Psicología Positiva; March, 2012; Madrid, Spain.
Quero S, Andreu-Mateu S, Moragrega I, Baños RM, Molés M, Nebot S, Botella C. Un programa cognitivo-conductual que utiliza la realidad virtual para el tratamiento de los trastornos adaptativos: Una serie de casos. Revista Argentina de Psicología Clínica. In press.
Quero S, Molés M, Pérez-Ara MA, Botella C, Baños RM. An online emotional regulation system to deliver homework assignments for treating adjustment disorders. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;181:273-7. — View Citation
Rachyla I, Quero S, Botella C. Un tratamiento auto-aplicado a través de Internet para los Trastornos Adaptativos: Descripción de un ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado. Paper presented at: IX Congreso de la Asociación Española de Psicología Clínica y Psicopatología (AEPCP); October, 2015; Valencia, Spain.
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Other | Change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) (Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) score from pre-intervention to post-intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups. | The PANAS consists of 20 items that evaluate two independent dimensions: positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA). The range for each scale (10 items on each) is from 10 to 50. The Spanish version has demonstrated high internal consistency (0.89 to 0.91 for PA and NA, respectively, in women, and 0.87 and 0.89 for PA and NA, respectively, in men) in college students. | Up to 12 months | |
Other | Change in Environmental Reward Observation Scale (EROS) (Armento & Hopko, 2007; adapted and translated into Spanish by Barraca & Pérez-Álvarez, 2010) score from pre-intervention to post-intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups. | EROS is a brief self-report measure of environmental reward. It consists of 10 items which are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale. The original scale presents a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.85) and also a good test-retest reliability (r=0.85). The Spanish version shows similar indexes. | Up to 12 months | |
Other | Change in Multidimensional Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQLI) (Mezzich et al., 1999) score from pre-intervention to post-intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups. | It's a 10-item self-report tool which assesses physical and emotional well-being, self-care, occupational and interpersonal functioning, community and services support, personal and spiritual fulfillment and the global perception of quality of life. The satisfaction in each of these areas is measured using a 10-point Likert rating scale. MQLI is brief and easy to administer. It also presents good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.79) and test-retest reliability index of 0.89. | Up to 12 months | |
Other | Change in Expectations and Treatment Opinion Scale (adapted from Borkovec & Nau, 1972) score from pre-intervention to post-intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups. | This self-report inventory measures patients' expectations before they start the treatment and their satisfaction when they complete the treatment. The 6 items are rated from 1 ("Not at all") to 10 ("Highly") and provide information about the extent to which: 1) the treatment is perceived as logic; 2) patients are satisfied with the treatment; 3) the treatment would be recommended to a friend with the same problem; 4) the treatment would be useful to treat other psychological problems; 5) patients perceive the treatment as useful for their particular problem; and 6) the treatment is perceived as aversive. | Up to 12 months | |
Primary | Change in Beck Depression Inventory - Second Edition (BDI-II) (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996; validated in Spanish population by Sanz, Navarro, & Vázquez, 2003) score from pre-intervention to post-intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups. | BDI-II is a self-report inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression. The total score is obtained adding the 21 items which constitute the instrument and can be a maximum of 63 points. The instrument has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.76 to 0.95) and a test-retest reliability of around 0.8. | Up to 12 months | |
Primary | Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (Beck & Steer, 1990; validated in Spanish population by Magán, Sanz, & García-Vera, 2008) score from pre-intervention to post-intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups. | BAI measures the severity of both physiological and cognitive symptoms of anxiety. The 21 items are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale (from 0 to 3) and the total score, which oscillates between 0 and 63, is obtained after directly adding the score of each item. Psychometric analysis carried out so far show excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.85). | Up to 12 months | |
Secondary | Change in Inventory of Stress and Loss (Mor, Molés, Rachyla, & Quero, 2015) score from pre-intervention to post-intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups. | This inventory is an adaptation of the Complicated Grief Inventory (CGI; Prigerson et al., 1995). It consists of 17 first-person statements regarding the degree to which the lost person/situation interferes in the individual's life. There are 5 response options, ranging from 0 ("Never") to 4 ("Always"). The instrument has excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha .86) and a test-retest reliability of around 0.90 | Up to 12 months | |
Secondary | Change in Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 1996) score from pre-intervention to post-intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months follow-ups. | PTGI is a 21-item instrument which assesses positive outcomes reported by persons who have experienced traumatic events. A 6-point Likert response format is used, so that each statement is rated from "I did not experience this change as a result of my crisis" (scored 0), to "I experienced this change to a very great degree as a result of my crisis" (scored 5). The instrument has an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.90) and acceptable test-retest reliability of around 0.71. | Up to 12 months |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06423417 -
RCT: the Effectiveness of LifeHack in Improving Mental Wellbeing in University Students.
|
N/A |