Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05970562 |
Other study ID # |
2016P002849C |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
Early Phase 1
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 1, 2024 |
Est. completion date |
April 1, 2029 |
Study information
Verified date |
July 2023 |
Source |
Massachusetts General Hospital |
Contact |
Jarrad Van Stan, PhD, CCC-SLP |
Phone |
617-643-8410 |
Email |
jvanstan[@]mgh.harvard.edu |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Vocal hyperfunction (VH) is the most commonly treated class of voice disorders by
speech-language pathologists and voice therapy is the primary curative treatment. Patients
and clinicians report that generalizing improved voicing into daily life is the most
significant barrier to successful therapy. We will test if extending biofeedback into the
patient's daily life using ambulatory voice monitoring will significantly improve
generalization during therapy and if individual patient factors, like how easily they can
modify their voice and engagement during therapy, moderate the effects of the biofeedback.
Description:
Vocal hyperfunction (VH) is ostensibly caused by and/or associated with pathological daily
voice use and involves the most commonly treated voice disorders by speech-language
pathologists, e.g., vocal fold nodules, muscle tension dysphonia. Voice therapy is the
primary curative option for VH. For example, even when patients undergo laryngeal surgery to
remove lesions, they are still thought to be at risk for recurrence unless they successfully
complete post-surgical voice therapy. However, voice therapy suffers from high rates of
patient dropout. Patients and clinicians report that generalizing desired vocal behaviors
from the therapy session into daily life is one of the most significant barriers to
successful voice therapy. Despite this critical barrier, voice therapy remains entirely
dependent upon episodic delivery within an in-clinic or virtual session. Thus, this project
will test if adding Ambulatory Voice Monitoring with Biofeedback (AVM-B) significantly
addresses this generalization challenge, as it can directly extend therapeutic activities
into the patient's daily life. A clinical trial will randomize patients with VH to receive an
evidence-based therapy (Conversation Training Therapy; CTT) or CTT with AVM-B added. In Aim
1, it is hypothesized that, compared to patients who only received CTT, patients who receive
CTT and AVM-B will demonstrate significantly better generalization during therapy which will
be retained immediately after therapy and six months later. In Aim 2, we will explore patient
factors that mediate the relationship between therapy and generalization, hypothesizing that
stimulabilty-how easily a patient can modify their voice-and engagement-the patient's level
of effort during therapy-will be positively correlated to the amount of generalization in
daily life. If successful, this work would result in multiple paradigm-shifting impacts with
potential to improve the efficiency of clinical practice. AVM-B would become one of the first
evidence-based voice treatment activities taking place primarily outside the therapy session.
Future work could investigate how AVM-B could transition voice therapy from once-a-week
sessions into a continuous process integrated into the patient's daily life. Further inquiry
could improve generalization by identifying evidence-based methods to tailor therapy based on
individual patient factors such as stimulability and engagement. After discharge, AVM-B could
provide a means for patients to "recalibrate" themselves and prevent relapse without having
to see a clinician. Finally, implementation work could help clinicians adopt/adapt AVM-B and
evaluate its effects on dropouts.