Vitreomacular Adhesion Clinical Trial
Official title:
A Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double-masked, Multicenter Trial of Microplasmin Intravitreal Injection for Non-surgical Treatment of Focal Vitreomacular Adhesion
Verified date | April 2014 |
Source | ThromboGenics |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal microplasmin 125µg dose in subjects wiht focal vitreomacular adhesion.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 326 |
Est. completion date | April 2010 |
Est. primary completion date | March 2010 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Presence of focal vitreomacular adhesion (i.e., central vitreal adhesion within 6mm Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) field surrounded by elevation of the posterior vitreous cortex) that in the opinion of the Investigator is related to decreased visual function (such as metamorphopsia, decreased visual acuity, or other visual complaint) Exclusion Criteria: - Any evidence of proliferative retinopathy (including Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) or other ischemic retinopathies involving vitreoretinal vascular proliferation) or exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) or retinal vein occlusion in the study eye. - Subjects with any vitreous hemorrhage or any other vitreous opacification which precludes either of the following: visualization of the posterior pole by visual inspection OR adequate assessment of the macula by either OCT and/or fluorescein angiogram in the study eye. - Subjects with macular hole diameter > 400 µm in the study eye. - Aphakia in the study eye. - High myopia (more than 8D) in study eye (unless prior cataract extraction or refractive surgery that makes refraction assessment unreliable for myopia severity approximation, in which case axial length >28 mm is an exclusion). |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | University of Michigan-Kellogg Eye Center | Ann Arbor | Michigan |
United States | Southeast Retina Center, PC | Augusta | Georgia |
United States | Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute | Aurora | Colorado |
United States | Austin Retina Associates | Austin | Texas |
United States | Maine Vitreoretinal Consultants, LLC, PA | Bangor | Maine |
United States | Retina Vitreous Associate Medical Group | Beverly Hills | California |
United States | Pennsylvania Retina Specialists, P.C. | Camp Hill | Pennsylvania |
United States | Rush University Med. Ctr | Chicago, | Illinois |
United States | Colorado Retina Associates, PC | Denver | Colorado |
United States | Kresge Eye Institute | Detroit | Michigan |
United States | Duke Eye Center | Durham | North Carolina |
United States | National Ophthalmologic Research Institute | Ft. Meyers | Florida |
United States | Vitreo-Retinal Associates | Grand Rapids | Michigan |
United States | Vitroretinal Consultants | Houston | Texas |
United States | VMR Institute | Huntington Beach | California |
United States | Midwest Eye Institute | Indianapolis, | Indiana |
United States | Souteastern Retina Associates | Kingsport | Tennessee |
United States | Retina Association of Cleveland | Lakewood | Ohio |
United States | Univ. Of Kentuck/Kentucky-Clinic/Dept of Ophthal & VS | Lexington | Kentucky |
United States | Jules Stein Eye Institute/UCLA | Los Angeles | California |
United States | Valley Retina Institute, P.A. | McAllen | Texas |
United States | Vitroretinal Surgery PA | Minneapolis | Minnesota |
United States | Retina Vitreous Centre, PA | New Brunswick | New Jersey |
United States | Columbia University - Harkness Eye Institute | New York | New York |
United States | New York Eye and Ear Infirmary | New York | New York |
United States | Retina Vitreous Surgeons of Central NY | New York | New York |
United States | University of Miami-Bascom Palmer Eye Institute- Palm Beach | Palm Beach | Florida |
United States | Southern California Desert Retina Consultants | Palm Springs | California |
United States | Assocaited Retina Consultants, Ltd. | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Retinal Consultants of AZ | Phoenix | Arizona |
United States | Allegheny Ophthalmic & Orbital Associates, PC | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania |
United States | Associated Retina Consultants | Royal Oak, | Michigan |
United States | Retinal Consultants Medical Group | Sacramento | California |
United States | Retinal Consultants of San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas |
United States | Sarasota Retina Institute | Sarasota | Florida |
United States | Caroline Eye Associates | Southern Pines | North Carolina |
United States | Retina Association of NJ | Teaneck | New Jersey |
United States | National Retina Institute | Towson | Maryland |
United States | Retina Centers, P.C. | Tucson | Arizona |
United States | Wake Forest University Eye Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina |
United States | Center for Retina and Macular Disease | Winter Haven | Florida |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
ThromboGenics |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Proportion of Subjects With Nonsurgical Resolution of Focal Vitreomacular Adhesion at Day 28. | The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects with nonsurgical resolution of focal vitreomacular adhesion at Day 28 post-injection, as determined by masked Central Reading Center (CRC) Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) evaluation. Any subjects who had a creation of an anatomical defect (i.e. retinal hole, retinal detachment) that resulted in loss of vision or that required additional intervention were not counted as successes for this primary endpoint. | Day 28 | No |
Secondary | Proportion of Subjects With Total Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD) at Day 28 | The key secondary endpoint of this study was the proportion of subjects with total Posterior Vitreous Detachment (PVD) at Day 28, as determined by masked Investigator assessment of B-scan ultrasound. | Day 28 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Active, not recruiting |
NCT01966328 -
A Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Resolvine for Treatment of Vitreomacular Attachment
|
Phase 1 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02001701 -
Intravitreal Gas for Vitreomacular Adhesion
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02322229 -
Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction/Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02160340 -
Prevalence of Vitreomacular Adhesion in Patients 40 Years and Older
|
||
Completed |
NCT00798317 -
Trial of Microplasmin Intravitreal Injection for Non-Surgical Treatment of Focal Vitreomacular Adhesion. The MIVI-TRUST (TG-MV-007) Trial.
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02035748 -
Assessment of Patients Treated With JETREA® for Vitreomacular Traction
|
Phase 4 |