Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06232941 |
Other study ID # |
FDASU-REC1261 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 1, 2024 |
Est. completion date |
December 1, 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2023 |
Source |
Ain Shams University |
Contact |
Nourhan M Yehia, assistant lecturer |
Phone |
+2011146656546 |
Email |
nourhan.yehia[@]miuegypt.edu.eg |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Statement of the problem:
Accurate pulpal diagnosis is essential for decision making between vital pulp therapy and
root canal treatment. Clinical and radiographic examinations do not correctly reflect the
histological state of the pulp and consequently its ability to heal. Also, despite the
various advantages of using MTA as a pulp capping agent, it has several drawbacks.
Aim of the study:
The aim of the study is to compare two types of calcium silicate-based materials to MTA in
permanent mature molars diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis regarding the following
parameters; level of inflammatory biomarker level, clinical and radiographic outcomes.
Materials and methods:
Thirty-six patients with mature permanent molars exhibiting signs and symptoms indicative of
irreversible pulpitis will be enrolled. A careful periodontal treatment and standardized
operative procedure will be followed for all participants. Gingival crevicular fluid samples
will be obtained before any local anesthetics' administration, followed by isolation of teeth
with a dental dam and removal of caries. Pulpotomy will be performed using sterile round bur
till level of orifices and then haemostasis will be achieved using sodium hypochlorite. At
this point, patients will be randomly divided into three groups of 12 depending on the type
of calcium silicate-based material used. Later, resin modified glass ionomer will be applied,
etching, bonding and placement of composite as the permanent restoration. Follow up
clinically and radiographically will be done.
Description:
For many centuries, there has been a closely held belief that any vital mature permanent
tooth diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis will require root canal treatment. The reason for
such treatment modality, is the high success rate reaching 100% if performed with high
standards(1). However, many studies have demonstrated that root canal therapy can be
time-consuming(2), necessitate multiple visits(3), be expensive for both the patient and the
dentist, and can increase the likelihood that the tooth will fracture because of the loss of
tooth structure(2).
On the other hand, vital pulp therapy (VPT) provides many advantages compared to root canal
treatment. For example; it maintains the proprioceptive sensation of the tooth, biological
immune response from the retained pulp tissue can prevent infection of the apical area,
regenerative and repair potential of the pulp is retained, structural integrity of the tooth
is maintained, lowering the risk of fracture and there is a notable decrease in pain and
discomfort for the patient (4).
More conservative VPT like pulpotomy was limited to immature teeth with mechanical, carious,
or traumatic pulp exposure who don't exhibit any periapical disease. In such cases, the goal
has been to ensure completion of root formation (apexogenesis)(5). However, the European
Society of Endodontology (ESE) and the American Association of Endodontists (AAE) recently
released position statements stating that "pre-treatment diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis
is not necessarily an indication for pulpectomy", ushering in a new era for minimally
invasive VPT in mature permanent teeth Although, several studies (8,14)found that using
mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) for VPT of cariously exposed permanent teeth with
irreversible pulpitis resulted in high clinical success rates. Clinically, there have been
various complaints against MTA. There have been reports of difficult handling, prolonged
setting time, expensive cost, and probable tooth discoloration By far, the most popular and
widely utilized materials in the endodontic therapy are calcium silicate cements. Odontocem
(Australian Dental Manufacturing, Brisbane, Australia) is a calcium silicate-based technology
containing 0.2% of the low steroid triamcinolone acetonide and has outstanding
biocompatibility, handling properties and least amount of staining potential. It can be
utilised as a dentine substitute for lining deep cavities. Odontocem is proposed to provide
antibacterial activity due to its initial high PH and pain relief due to the presence of a
potent steroid (16).
Another calcium silicate material that is also recently introduced in the market is NeoPutty
(Avalon Biomed Inc., Bradenton, USA). NeoPutty is premixed format of tricalcium
silicate-based material (Bioceramic). It's composed of tantalum oxide, tricalcium silicate,
calcium aluminate, dicalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, and calcium sulfate(17). Guillen
et al 2022 (17)compared the cytocompatibility of NeoPutty to NeoMTA Plus and MTA Angelus and
concluded that all three materials provided adequate cytocompatibility and preliminary
evidence that NeoPutty can be used as pulp capping agent in VPT.