Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV / HEV Filter

Visual Acuity Clinical Trial

Official title:

Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV / HEV Filter

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT05099380
• Other study ID #: CR-6470
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: October 5, 2021
• Est. completion date: November 24, 2021

Study information

• Verified date: January 2023
• Source: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a bilateral, dispensing, randomized, controlled, subject-masked, 2-arm parallel study to evaluate safety and efficacy

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 296
• Est. completion date: November 24, 2021
• Est. primary completion date: November 24, 2021
• Accepts healthy volunteers: Accepts Healthy Volunteers
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 39 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

1. Read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.

2. Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.

3. Be between 18 and 39 (inclusive) years of age at the time of screening.

4. By self-report, habitually wear spherical silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses in both eyes in a daily reusable or daily disposable wear modality (i.e. not extended wear modality). Habitual wear is defined as a minimum of 6 hours of wear per day, for a minimum of 5 days per week during the past 30 days.

5. Have a habitual contact lens prescription that is current within the prior 6 months, and they must have worn that prescription for at least 2 weeks prior to entering the study.

6. The subject's vertex corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -1.00 through -6.00 D in both eyes.

7. The subject's refractive cylinder must be 1.00 D or less.

8. The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:

1. Be currently pregnant or lactating.

2. Have any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear.

3. Have any autoimmune disease or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. Habitual medications used by successful soft contact lens wearers are considered acceptable.

4. Have any previous, or planned, ocular or interocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.).

5. Be currently wearing lenses in a monovision, multifocal, toric, or extended wear modality.

6. Have participated in a contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 14 days prior to study enrollment

7. Be an employee (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician) or immediate family member of an employee (including partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild or sibling of the employee or their spouse) of the clinical site.

8. Have a history of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.

9. Have any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or contagious immunosuppressive diseases (e.g., HIV) by self-report. 10. Have any Grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g., edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) on the FDA classification scale, any previous history or signs of a contact lens-related corneal inflammatory event (e.g., past peripheral ulcer or round peripheral scar), or any other ocular abnormality that may contraindicate contact lens wear.

11. Have any ocular infection. 12. Have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.

13. Have entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, or aphakia.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Visual Acuity

Intervention

Device:
• senofilcon A C3
TEST Lens
• senofilcon A
CONTROL Lens

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	Birmingham Vision Care	Bloomfield Township	Michigan
United States	Primary Eyecare Group	Brentwood	Tennessee
United States	Dr. Debbie H. Kim, OD	Closter	New Jersey
United States	James T. Fujimoto, O.D.	Cupertino	California
United States	Dr. James Weber & Associates, PA	Jacksonville	Florida
United States	Sabal Eye Care	Longwood	Florida
United States	Flora Chen Poveda, OD, PA	Orange Park	Florida
United States	Kannarr Eye Care	Pittsburg	Kansas
United States	VisualEyes, Inc	Roswell	Georgia
United States	Botetourt Eyecare, LLC	Salem	Virginia
United States	William J. Bogus, OD, FAAO	Salt Lake City	Utah
United States	Randall Go, OD	San Francisco	California
United States	Tallahassee Eye Center	Tallahassee	Florida
United States	Tyler Eye Associates	Tyler	Texas
United States	Sacco Eye Group	Vestal	New York
United States	West Bay Eye Associates	Warwick	Rhode Island
United States	Professional Vision Care, Inc.	Westerville	Ohio

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Overall Quality of Vision Score	Overall quality of vision score was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE vision score for each lens type was reported.	2-Week Follow-up
Primary	Distance Monocular logMAR Visual Acuity	Monocular visual acuity was measured on a logMAR (Logarithm of Minimal Angle of Resolution) scale and was evaluated at distance (4 meter) under high luminance high contrast lighting condition using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) charts. Letter-by-letter results calculated the visual performance score for each chart read. LogMAR scores closer to zero, or below zero, indicate a better visual acuity. A logMAR visual performance score of 0.0 is equivalent to Snellen visual acuity of 20/20.	2-Week Follow-up
Primary	Proportion of Eyes With Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings	Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits, 2-week follow-up and final evaluation). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with Grade 3 or higher SLF and those with Grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with Grade 3 or higher SLF was reported.	up to 2-week follow-up
Primary	Proportion of Eyes With Unacceptable Lens Fitting	Contact lens fitting acceptance was assessed for each subject eye using a biomicroscope post lens insertion and the 2-week follow-up. Lens fit was a binary variable where acceptable lens fit=1 and unacceptable lens fit=0. The proportion of eyes with unacceptable lens fit was reported. Summaries presented in the Participant flow are summarized by planned arm, where as summaries for this measure are summarized by actual arm. One subject was dispensed the incorrect study lens, there for, the number of subjects that were randomized to the Control were 149 but 150 subjects were actually dispensed the control.	Up to 2-Week Follow-up
Secondary	Overall Comfort Scores	Overall comfort scores were assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE comfort score for each lens type was reported.	2-Week Follow-up
Secondary	Overall Handling Scores	Overall handling scores were assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The average CLUE handling score for each lens type was reported.	2-Week Follow-up
Secondary	Situational Visual Performance - Indoors	Indoor performance was assessed using the individual questionnaire item "Clarity of Vision indoors in bright light" with a 5-point Likert scale (1: Excellent, 2: Very Good, 3: Good, 4: Fair and 5: Poor) and a Not Applicable response option. Subject responses were reported by lens using frequencies.	2-Week Follow-up
Secondary	Situational Visual Performance - Digital Devices	Situational visual performance related to digital device use was assessed using the individual preference item "Overall preference while using computer screens & digital devices". The response set include: Strongly prefer my habitual lenses, Slightly prefer my habitual lenses, No Preference, Slightly prefer the study lenses and Strongly prefer the study lenses. Responses were collapsed into three categories for analysis purpose: Prefer Study Lens, No Preference, Prefer Habitual Lens. Subject responses were reported by lens using frequencies.	2-Week Follow-up