Visual Acuity Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Astigmatic Contact Lenses
NCT number | NCT03086447 |
Other study ID # | CR-5871 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | N/A |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | March 1, 2017 |
Est. completion date | May 4, 2017 |
Verified date | June 2018 |
Source | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
Randomized, double-masked, 5-visit, bilateral dispensing, parallel group study to demonstrate that the investigational contact lens meets the design requirements related to corneal staining, lens fit, visual acuity and rotational performance as well as subjective comfort and handling. Subjects will wear the contact lenses for a total of 28-36 days.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 267 |
Est. completion date | May 4, 2017 |
Est. primary completion date | May 4, 2017 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 40 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - 1) Healthy adult males or females age =18-40 years of age with signed informed consent. 2) The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. 3) Subject must be a habitual soft toric contact lens wearer. Habitual wearer is defined as someone who wears contact lenses for at least 6 hours a day, 5 days a week for the past 30 days. 4) Subject's vertex corrected spherical component of their distance refraction must be between -1.00 to -4.75 Diopter (D) (inclusive) in each eye. 5) Subject's vertex corrected refractive cylinder must be between -0.75 and -1.50 DC (inclusive) in each eye. 6) Subject's refractive cylinder axis must be 180±25 and 90±15 in each eye. 7) The subject must have visual acuity best correctable to 20/25 or better for each eye 8) The subject must read and sign the Informed Consent form. Exclusion Criteria: - 1) Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding, 2) Any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may contraindicate contact lens wear. 3) Any ocular medications use within the last one month. 4) Any systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. 5) Any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV), by self-report. 6) Habitual wearer of extended wear contact lenses. 7) Known sensitivity to Revitalens OcuTec® 8) Any previous history of ocular and/or refractive surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.). 9) A clinical finding or history of entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, aphakia, or moderate or above corneal distortion, by self-report. 10) History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus, by self-report. 11) Habitual wearer of rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses, orthokeratology lenses, or hybrid lenses (e.g. SynergEyes, SoftPerm) within the past 6 months. 12) Employee of investigational clinic (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician). 13) Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 14 days prior to study enrollment. 14) Clinically significant (grade 3 or higher) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar injection or any other abnormalities which would contraindicate contact lens wear. 15) Any history of a contact lens-related corneal inflammatory event within the past year that may contraindicate contact lens wear. 16) Any active ocular infection. 17) Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear. 18) Any fluctuations in vision due to clinically significant dry eye or other ocular conditions. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | ABQ Eye Care | Albuquerque | New Mexico |
United States | Premier Vision | Amarillo | Texas |
United States | Indiana University School of Optometry | Bloomington | Indiana |
United States | ProCare Vision Centers | Granville | Ohio |
United States | Dr. James Weber & Associates, PA | Jacksonville | Florida |
United States | Edward S. Wygonik, OD | Jacksonville Beach | Florida |
United States | Sabal Eye Care | Longwood | Florida |
United States | Maitland Vision Center | Maitland | Florida |
United States | Total Eye Care, PA | Memphis | Tennessee |
United States | Kannarr Eye Care | Pittsburg | Kansas |
United States | EyeCare Professionals of Powell | Powell | Ohio |
United States | Botetourt Eyecare, LLC | Salem | Virginia |
United States | William J Bogus, OD, FAAO | Salt Lake City | Utah |
United States | Sacco Eye Group | Vestal | New York |
United States | West Bay Eye Associates | Warwick | Rhode Island |
United States | Professional Vision Care, Inc | Westerville | Ohio |
United States | Golden Optometric Group | Whittier | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Monocular Distance Visual Acuity (VA) | Monocular distance visual acuity was measured with the study lens using a Snellen distance VA chart at an optical distance of 20 feet throughout the study. Observed VA data collected during all planned visits were dichotomized whether VA was "20/40 or better (acceptable VA)" or "worse than 20/40 (unacceptable VA)". VA of 20/40 with a negative modifier was considered worse than 20/40. The number of eye with acceptable VA was reported for each study lens. | Up to 4-Week Follow-up | |
Primary | Lens Fit Acceptance | Lens fit characteristics were assessed using slit lamp with respect to lens position, movement and tightness. Each lens fit collected at fitting (visit 1) was judged being either acceptable or unacceptable based on the static and dynamic fit characteristic. The number of eyes with acceptable lens fit was reported for each study lens. | 15 Minutes Post Lens Fitting | |
Primary | Lens Stability With Blink | Lens rotational stability with blink was assessed using slit lamp with beam that can be rotated. The stability of the scribe mark rotational position during a series of normal (unforced) blinks was assessed, and then dichotomized whether stability was less than or equal to 5-degree (acceptable stability) or greater (unacceptable stability). The number of eye with acceptable stability was reported for each lens. | 15 Minutes Post Lens Fitting | |
Primary | Absolute Lens Rotation | Lens rotation was assessed using slit lamp with beam that can be rotated. The rotational error (assume shortest distance) and direction (base toward the nose or temple) were calculated, and then absolute rotation was dichotomized whether absolute rotation was less than or equal to 10-degree (acceptable rotation) or greater (unacceptable rotation). The number of eyes with acceptable lens rotation for each lens was reported. | 15-minutes Post Lens Insertion | |
Primary | Corneal Staining | Contact lens related corneal staining was assessed using slit lamp throughout the study. Corneal staining was graded using a 5-level scale: 0=no staining, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate and 4=severe. Corneal staining data collected during planned and unplanned visits were dichotomized whether the level of corneal stating was grade 3 or higher (unacceptable CS) or less than grade 3 (acceptable CS). The number of eyes with Grade 3 or higher was reported for each lens type. | Up to 4-Week Follow-up | |
Secondary | Overall Comfort | Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. | Up to 4- Week Follow-up | |
Secondary | Overall Handling | Overall Handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. | Up to 4- Week Follow-up | |
Secondary | Monocular Distance Visual Acuity (VA) | Monocular distance visual acuity was measured with the study lens using a Snellen distance VA chart at an optical distance of 20 feet. Observed VA data collected at fitting were dichotomized whether VA was "20/20 or better (optimal VA)" or "worse than 20/20". VA of 20/20 with a negative modifier was considered worse than 20/20. The number of eyes with 20/20 vision was reported for each study lens. | 15 Minutes Post Lens Fitting |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT06019806 -
Effects of Forward Head Posture Correction on Visual Acuity in Low Level Visually Impaired University Students
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04567186 -
Evaluation of a Daily Disposable Novel Multifocal Contact Lens in a Hyperopic Population
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02568254 -
Evaluation of Three Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01951703 -
Senofilcon A Investigational Manufacturing Process
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT00637468 -
EAGLE - Multicenter Study of the European Assessment Group for Lysis in the Eye
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04632901 -
A New Parameter for the Assessment of Distance Visual Capacity: the Critical Visual Acuity (CVA)
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03747601 -
Temporal Interference Brain Stimulation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06131476 -
Clinical Investigation of Visual Acuity in Contact Lens Wearers After Instillation of a Lipid- Based Lubricating Eye Drop
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05414565 -
Post-Market Study of Alcon Intraocular Lenses
|
||
Completed |
NCT05056870 -
Clinical Evaluation of Spherical Soft Contact Lenses, Toric Soft Contact Lenses and Spectacles in Low Astigmats
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04615507 -
Evaluation of a Daily Disposable Novel Multifocal Contact Lens in a Myopic Population; Part 2
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05099380 -
Validation of Senofilcon A With New UV / HEV Filter
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03713281 -
Evaluation of a Toric Multifocal Contact Lens Manufactured in Etafilcon Material in a Low ADD Hyperopic Population
|
||
Completed |
NCT05582304 -
Role of Glare and Spectral Filtering on Contrast Sensitivity: A Pilot Study
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03742271 -
Evaluation of Senofilcon A With New UV-blocker on a Neophyte Population
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04995055 -
Evaluation of Multifocal Contact Lens Designs With and Without an HEV Blocker on Visual Function
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05554640 -
Clinical Performance of Two Daily Disposable Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01926704 -
MTF Image Modifications
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04649606 -
Dynamic Characterisation of Meibomian Gland Structure
|
||
Completed |
NCT05101252 -
Comparison of a Daily Disposable Multifocal Contact Lens to a Marketed Product
|
N/A |