Clinical Trials Logo

Ventricular Tachycardia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Ventricular Tachycardia.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00721032 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Ventricular Tachycardia

Anti-arrhythmic Medication v. MRI-Merge Ablation in the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia

Start date: June 2012
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a morbid arrhythmia responsible for many sudden deaths and ICD shocks. Despite much progress in the treatment of arrhythmia, VT remains a therapeutic challenge. Most patients with VT have an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death, however, an ICD merely treats VT, it does not prevent VT. In patients with recurrent VT and ICD shocks, two strategies are available to decrease the burden of VT. The first is antiarrhythmic drugs, and the second is VT ablation. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs and VT ablation guided by MRI. VT can sometimes be suppressed with antiarrhythmic medications, however, these are often ineffective, and carry a high burden of side effects. Many forms of VT can be cured by selective destruction of critical electrical pathways with catheter ablation. A major limitation in the ablation of VT, however, is the time required to localize scar tissue and important pathways for targeting of lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging can now obtain reliable images of scar location within the ventricles. Recent advances in electroanatomical mapping systems allow operators to import pre-acquired images into the mapping system. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of importing historic MRI scar maps of the ventricles into the electroanatomical system and using such images to guide catheter ablation, as compared to antiarrhythmic drug suppression of VT. We suspect that MRI guidance will be especially useful in patients with "unstable" VT, i.e. VT that causes an abrupt drop in blood pressure, and thus cannot be maintained in the electrophysiology (EP) lab for mapping and entertainment purposes. Patients referred for VT ablation have ICDs. Through previously completed animal work (Circulation 2004; 110(5): 475-82) and a human trial (2006 Sep 19;114(12):1277-84) we have demonstrated the safety of MRI in the setting of pacemakers and implantable defibrillators using appropriate precautions. Through careful device programming and using MRI sequences with limited energy exposure (specific absorption rate < 2 W/kg) we will study the pre procedural myocardial anatomy of patients enrolled into this study. The primary endpoint will be lack of VT documented by implantable defibrillator (when present) interrogation or Holter monitoring 6 months post ablation. The secondary endpoints will be comparison of inducible arrhythmia at the end of the procedure, procedure time, comparison of endocardial voltage mapping to scar on delayed enhancement MRI images, and complications in each study arm.

NCT ID: NCT00585871 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Ventricular Tachycardia

Clonidine to Prevent Implantable Cardiovertor Defibrillator Firing

Start date: May 2006
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Cardiac arrest or sustained VT (ventricular tachycardia) in patients with heart disease is best treated with an ICD (implantable cardioverter defibrillator). However, the ICD alone is not appropriate therapy for patients with frequent VT episodes. In fact frequent shocks for VT may predict a poorer prognosis. Anti-arrhythmic drugs are co-administered with ICDs in up to 50% of patients to prevent VT episodes, but antiarrhythmic drugs may have harmful effects. Thus improved drugs to prevent VT without interfering with ICD function are needed. Recent data including our own suggest that clonidine may be a new therapy to prevent ICD shocks. It may act centrally on sympathetic outflow and peripherally and selectively on cardiac Purkinje, to suppress and control VT occurring in patients. Our purpose is to test the hypothesis that clonidine reduces frequent VT better than beta blocker in patients with ICDs. After informed consent patients will be randomized in a single blind fashion to either clonidine or metoprolol given three times per day. Other prescribed drugs may be adjusted to promote toleration of the study drug. ICD interrogations of episodes of VT will be the primary endpoint. Device based NIPS (non-invasive programmed stimulation) testing in a subset of these patients will allow mechanistic understanding of the clonidine effect. All of the procedural techniques are in place as performed clinically; preliminary data are given showing feasibility of the project.