Ventral Hernia Clinical Trial
Official title:
Tacks Versus Glue for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Treating Defects Between 2 and 5 cm Width: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Verified date | May 2021 |
Source | Duomed |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
In laparoscopic ventral hernia repair, an abundance of methods has been developed to fix the mesh to the abdominal wall, including sutures (non-absorbable or absorbable), staples (non-absorbable or absorbable), clips, tacks (non-absorbable or absorbable) and (fibrin and synthetic) glues. Which fixation technique is superior, is still under evaluation. There is clearly a need for larger trials to obtain confident results on the safety and performance of glue mesh fixation and tack mesh fixation in LVHR. The hypothesis of this prospective, randomized controlled study is that post-operative pain at 4 to 6 weeks after mesh fixation with glue (LiquiBand® Fix 8™) will not differ compared to treatment with absorbable tacks during LVHR. A total of 510 patients will be recruited for this trial. This study will assess: pain, hernia recurrence, safety, procedural characteristics, technical success, analgesic intake, period to return to normal activity and quality of life.
Status | Terminated |
Enrollment | 16 |
Est. completion date | May 20, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | May 20, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with ventral hernia (primary or incisional) with a defect size between 2 and 5 cm and eligible for laparoscopic repair. 2. Patients with ASA grade I to III. 3. Patient is at least 18 years old. 4. Patient must sign and date the informed consent form prior to treatment. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient with a recurrence of a previously treated ventral hernia repaired with mesh. Recurrences are only allowed to be included after former primary (suture) repair or retromuscular/onlay mesh repair. 2. Patient is treated by open surgery. 3. Patient has more than one defect. Treatment of Swiss-cheese defects (multiple small defects) is allowed if all defects can be treated with one mesh. Total width cannot exceed 5 cm. 4. Patient with a complex hernia, likely not eligible for laparoscopic repair. Complexity is determined by the investigator (adhesions, small bowel resection, etc). 5. Patient with a life expectancy of less than 2 years. 6. Patient is suspected of being unable to comply with the study protocol. 7. Patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 8. Patient with ASA IV or V. 9. Patient is pregnant. 10. Patient needs acute surgery. 11. Patient is scheduled for surgery within 6 weeks after the index-procedure. 12. Patient has fibromyalgia. 13. Patient with depression as shown in patient medical record. 14. Patient is enrolled in another study. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Belgium | Hospital Network Antwerp (ZNA) Jan Palfijn | Antwerp | |
Belgium | General Hospital Sint Jan Brugge | Brugge | |
Belgium | University Hospital Brussels | Brussels | |
Belgium | CHU Charleroi | Charleroi | |
Belgium | General Hospital Sint Vincentius Deinze | Deinze | |
Belgium | ZOL Genk | Genk | |
Belgium | University Hospital Leuven | Leuven | |
Belgium | CHR Namur | Namur | |
Belgium | General Hospital Nikolaas | Sint-Niklaas | |
Belgium | Regional Hospital HH Tienen | Tienen | |
Belgium | General Hospital Delta Torhout | Torhout |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Duomed |
Belgium,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Pain in both groups at 4-6 weeks after LVHR using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) | The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. The patient is asked to select the number on the scale that corresponds to the worst level of pain he/she experiences. Pain is classified into mild (1 - 30 mm), moderate (31 - 60 mm) and severe (61 - 100 mm). Absence of pain is defined as VAS = 0. | At 4 - 6 weeks | |
Secondary | Period of hospitalization | Record the number of days in hospital until discharge | up to 5 days | |
Secondary | Operating time | Intra-operatively | ||
Secondary | Intra-operative adverse events | Intra-operative adverse events include bleeding and enterotomy | Intra-operatively | |
Secondary | Post-operative adverse events | Post-operative adverse events include seroma (i.e. accumulation of wound fluid), ileus (i.e. bowel obstruction), infection, bowel injury, major bleeding requiring blood transfusion or re-intervention, complications due to anesthesia and minor bleeding at a trocar insertion site | up to 24 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Usability of the glue during the index-procedure | Usability scoring: 1 = bad -> 3 = moderate -> 5 = excellent | Intra-operatively | |
Secondary | Technical success of glue fixation | During the index-procedure, the investigator will register whether fixation of the mesh with glue achieved technical success or not. Technical success is defined as successful hernia repair as intended. | Intra-operatively | |
Secondary | Technical success of tack fixation | During the index-procedure, the investigator will register whether fixation of the mesh with tacks achieved technical success or not. Technical success is defined as successful hernia repair as intended. | Intra-operatively | |
Secondary | Pain at baseline using the VAS scale | The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. | At baseline | |
Secondary | Pain at discharge using the VAS scale | The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. | Up to 5 days | |
Secondary | Pain at 12 months follow-up using the VAS scale | The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. | At 12 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Pain at 24 months follow-up using the VAS scale | The VAS scale contains a 0 - 100 grading with 0 equaling no pain and 100 equaling the worst conceivable pain. | At 24 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Postoperative analgesic intake | Period of intake | Up to 24 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Postoperative analgesic intake | Type of intake | Up to 24 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Period to return to normal activity | Number of days after the index-procedure at which the patient resumes normal activities. | At 4 - 6 weeks follow-up | |
Secondary | Quality of life at baseline. | The Carolinas Comfort Scale questionnaire is a validated, disease-specific, quality of life questionnaire developed for patients undergoing hernia repair with mesh. It is a 23-item questionnaire that measures severity of pain, sensation, and movement limitations from the mesh in eight categories. The CCS score is derived by adding the scores from each of the 23 items. The best possible score is 0 and the worst possible score is 115. | At baseline | |
Secondary | Quality of life at 4-6 weeks. | CCS questionnaire | At 4 - 6 weeks follow-up | |
Secondary | Quality of life at 12 months follow-up. | CCS questionnaire | At 12 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Quality of life at 24 months follow-up. | CCS questionnaire | At 24 months follow-up | |
Secondary | Recurrences during follow-up | A clinical examination is conducted to evaluate recurrence. If there is any suspicion of recurrence, an ultrasound or MRI is performed according to hospital practice to distinguish true recurrences from bulging. | up to 24 months follow-up |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT06016426 -
Mass Closure vs Layer by Layer Closure
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05572021 -
A Comparison of the Outcomes in Fortiva and Strattice Mesh
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02263599 -
Conservative Treatment For Ventral Hernia
|
||
Completed |
NCT02263625 -
Regional Differences In Indication for Ventral Hernia Repair
|
||
Completed |
NCT02292264 -
Risk Factors and Complications of Ventral Hernia Repair
|
||
Completed |
NCT01961687 -
A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of Phasix™ Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair.
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01325246 -
Reoperation Rate Versus Clinical Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03283982 -
Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With IPOM
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05526209 -
Longitudinal Relaxing Incision as a Technique for Recurrence Prevention in Ventral Hernia
|
||
Completed |
NCT04438369 -
Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laprascopic Ventral Hernia Repair.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04173884 -
Video-based Collaborative Learning to Improve Ventral Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT02703662 -
Performance of Biologic Mesh Materials in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03938688 -
Randomized Control Trial Comparing Transfascial Suture for Mesh Fixation to No Mesh Fixation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01719718 -
The Influence of Closing the Gap on Postoperative Seroma and Recurrences in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03342040 -
Transverse Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04150796 -
Comparing eTEP and Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Onlay Mesh (IPOM) for Ventral Hernias
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03222102 -
Ventral Hernia Prevention After Liver Transplantation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05610267 -
Gentrix® Surgical Matrix for Soft Tissue Reinforcement in Ventral Hernia Repair
|
||
Terminated |
NCT01794338 -
The Use of Biologic Mesh vs Bioabsorbable Mesh During Ventral Hernia Repair in At-risk Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01886963 -
A Clinical Trial Using Spy Elite System in Planning Tissue Advancement Flaps After Ventral Hernia Repair
|
N/A |