Safe Critical Care: Testing Improvement Strategies

Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Clinical Trial

Official title:

Safe Critical Care: Testing Improvement Strategies

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT00975923
• Other study ID #: VU050413
• Secondary ID: AHRQ U18 HS01593
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• First received: September 10, 2009
• Last updated: December 8, 2015
• Start date: February 2006
• Est. completion date: April 2008

Study information

• Verified date: December 2015
• Source: Vanderbilt University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Health authority: United States: Institutional Review Board
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

One group of hospitals participated in a collaborative approach for healthcare quality improvement while another group was provided only a tool kit. The investigators' objective was to determine if the Collaborative would perform better at preventing central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP). Hospitals were randomized to the Tool Kit or Collaborative conditions. The investigators' study evaluated the effects on care processes and outcomes of a multi-institutional quality improvement initiative focused on preventing hospital associate infections. The investigators' hypothesis was that the strategies for implementing safe critical care practice will differ in level of achievement whereby the Collaborative group will perform better than the Tool Kit group. The outcome measure comprised clinical event rates and an index of safe practices that represent a bundling of key process measures related to evidence-based practices for preventing catheter-related blood-stream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit.

Description:

Continuous quality improvement (CQI) methodologies provide a framework for initiating and sustaining improvements in complex systems.1 By definition, CQI engages frontline staff in iterative problem solving using plan-do-study-act cycles of learning, with decision-making based on real-time process measurements. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) has sponsored Breakthrough Series (BTS) Collaboratives since 1996 to accelerate the uptake and impact of quality improvement. These collaboratives are typically guided by evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, incorporate change methodologies, and rely on clinical and process improvement subject matter experts. Organizations have been adopting the collaborative model, and there is a growing literature on its positive impact. This collaborative approach to healthcare improvement has appealing face validity but lacks definitive evidence of its effectiveness. A recent derivative of collaboratives has been deployment of tool kits for quality improvement. Intuition suggests that such tools kits may help to enable change, and, thus some agencies advocate the simpler approach of disseminating tool kits as a change strategy. We sought to compare the collaborative model with the tool kit model for improving care. Recommendations and guidelines for central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) prevention have not been implemented reliably, resulting in unnecessary ICU morbidity and mortality and fostering a national call for improvement. Our study evaluated the effects on care processes and outcomes of a multi-institutional quality improvement initiative focused on preventing CLABSI and VAP in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 59
• Est. completion date: April 2008
• Est. primary completion date: April 2008
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: Both
• Age group: 1 Year and older

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Medical centers with at least one adult or pediatric ICU.

• Medical centers within the Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) were eligible for enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Nonresponse to invitation to participate in our Safe Critical Care Initiative.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Health Services Research

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Central Line-associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI)
• Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
• Ventilator Associated Pneumonia

Intervention

Behavioral:
• Collaborative Group
In addition to the Tool Kit materials and web site support, facility leaders and managers in this group agreed to participate in a Collaborative to improve critical care. The Collaborative differed from the IHI BTS model in that teams did not come together for face-to-face educational and planning sessions but instead attended web seminars and teleconferences. Between these "virtual" learning sessions, teams implemented some of the suggested change ideas, measured the results of those changes, and reported back to the larger group. Teams were supported through monthly educational and troubleshooting conference calls, individual coaching by faculty members, and an e-mail listserver designed to stimulate interaction among teams.
• Tool Kit
Hospitals received a tool kit:evidence-based guidelines, CLABSI/VAP fact sheets, change ideas,quality improvement and teamwork methods, standardized data collection and charting tools. Periodic reminders of their commitment to the Safe Critical Care Initiative and access to web site containing all of the educational seminars, clinical tools, and quality improvement tools. ICUs in this group were on their own to initiate and implement a local hospital quality improvement initiative preventing CLABSI and VAP.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	HCA Hospital Corporation of America	Nashville	Tennessee

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Vanderbilt University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (5)

France DJ, Greevy RA Jr, Liu X, Burgess H, Dittus RS, Weinger MB, Speroff T. Measuring and comparing safety climate in intensive care units. Med Care. 2010 Mar;48(3):279-84. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181c162d6. — View Citation

Patel RP, Gambrell M, Speroff T, Scott TA, Pun BT, Okahashi J, Strength C, Pandharipande P, Girard TD, Burgess H, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Delirium and sedation in the intensive care unit: survey of behaviors and attitudes of 1384 healthcare profess — View Citation

Speroff T, Ely EW, Greevy R, Weinger MB, Talbot TR, Wall RJ, Deshpande JK, France DJ, Nwosu S, Burgess H, Englebright J, Williams MV, Dittus RS. Quality improvement projects targeting health care-associated infections: comparing Virtual Collaborative and — View Citation

Talbot TR, Tejedor SC, Greevy RA, Burgess H, Williams MV, Deshpande JK, McFadden P, Weinger MB, Englebright J, Dittus RS, Speroff T. Survey of infection control programs in a large national healthcare system. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;28(12) — View Citation

Wall RJ, Ely EW, Talbot TR, Weinger MB, Williams MV, Reischel J, Burgess LH, Englebright J, Dittus RS, Speroff T, Deshpande JK. Evidence-based algorithms for diagnosing and treating ventilator-associated pneumonia. J Hosp Med. 2008 Sep;3(5):409-22. doi: 1 — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	CLABSI and VAP Rates	Central line associated bloodstream infections(CLABSI) and ventilator associated pneumonias (VAP) using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions as number of events per 1,000 device days, data collection and surveillance methods.	18 Months: 3-month baseline and quarterly post-intervention periods	Yes
Secondary	Access of Tools and Use of Quality Improvement Strategies	Follow-up survey of ICU nurse and quality managers for all participating medical centers from Jan 2008 through April 2008 included questions about the implementation of process interventions: Access and use of clinical guidelines tools, access and use of quality improvement tools, and types of quality improvement implementation strategies.	18 months	No

External Links

•   Tool kit used for quality improvement