Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Active, not recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05707169 |
Other study ID # |
R.22.09.1805 - 2022/09/06 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Active, not recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
January 4, 2023 |
Est. completion date |
May 4, 2024 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2023 |
Source |
Mansoura University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
EVLA is used in in treating refluxing veins, commonly the GSV. The tip of catheter is usually
placed 2-2.5 cm distal to the sapheno-femoral junction. This technique theoretically provides
the lowest risk for endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT).
In the present study we aimed to evaluate the zero-distance technique (the kissing technique)
compared to 2-cm distance from SFJ valve in ablating incompetent GSV.
Description:
INTRODUCTION Chronic venous disease (CVD) is one of the most common pathologies in the
general population of adults in both industrialized and developing countries. the most severe
form of CVD is venous ulceration with an overall prevalence of about 1 % in the adult
population, which increases with age and is more common in women and obese patients. Venous
ulcers significantly impair quality of life, and their treatment places a heavy financial
burden upon healthcare systems. Varicose veins (VVs) is a common disease in adults, and VVs
without skin changes are present in about 20% of the population, while active ulcers are
found in 0.5%.The traditional surgical treatment of VVs is high ligation of the great
saphenous vein (GSV), axial stripping and phlebotomy, but the postoperative clinical
recurrence is as high as 60%.4 Minimally invasive techniques, such as endovenous laser
ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), have become widely used for the treatment
of VVS. Several reports have shown Several reports have shown that endovenous techniques are
as effective as traditional procedures.
EVLA is used in in treating refluxing veins, commonly the GSV. The tip of catheter is usually
placed 2-2.5 cm distal to the sapheno-femoral junction. This technique theoretically provides
the lowest risk for endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT).
In the present study we aimed to evaluate the zero-distance technique (the kissing technique)
compared to 2-cm distance from SFJ valve in ablating incompetent GSV. Postoperative quality
of life (QoL) analysis was assessed using the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) and
Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS).
Aim of the work: To compare laser therapy ablation of long saphenous vein reflux by
conventional and the kissing techniques on development of DVT, recurrence rate of VVs,
ulcer-free time, and health-related quality of life.
Patients and methods Study location: The study will be conducted at the department of
vascular surgery in Mansoura University, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura, Egypt .
Type of study: Randomized Controlled Prospective study Study duration: 2 years: 2022-2024
Sample size: It will include all patients presented to our department fulfilling the
inclusion criteria.
Study population: The study will be conducted in patients with Incompetent long saphenous
vein with and without ulcer.
Inclusion criteria Primary symptomatic VVS (CEAP, C3-C6), sapheno-femoral junction (SFJ)
incompetence, and GSV reflux from the groin to below the knee Exclusion criteria included;
history of venous surgery, suspected or proven deep venous thrombosis, history of DVT, reflux
of deep veins to distal limb, duplication of GSV, and patients' refusal to participate in the
trial.
Data collection: The demographics, symptoms, and preoperative clinical data will be
collected.
History Data: including underlying medical conditions, any previous associated morbidity.
Examination: Venous examinations. Laboratory: Blood picture, Blood sugar level, Kidney
functions, Liver functions and Coagulation profile.
Imaging: Duplex US Method of Randomization: Computer-based Therapies Conventional Technique:
Endogenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) uses a laser fibre, which is inserted into the refluxing
vein via skin puncture. Using 1470 nm laser and a radial fibre for less discomfort. The
catheter is placed 2-2.5 cm distal to the sapheno-femoral junction. Tumescence with a mixture
of 20 mL 2% lidocaine, 1: 200,000 adrenaline and 20 mL 0.5% levobupivacaine in 1 L of 0.9%
saline.
The kissing technique: The catheter is positioned exactly at the terminal valve of the SFJ
(kissing the valve).
Follow up
Criteria for technical success will be:
1. Closed or absent GSV with absent reflux
2. A re-canalized GSV or treatment failure will be defined as an open segment of the
treated vein segment of >10 cm in length.
3. All patients are followed in outpatient's settings at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after
surgery.
4. The operation time, number of punctures, intraoperative blood loss (determined by the
swabs weighed pre and postoperatively)
5. Recurrence of varicosities and any complications are recorded.
The criteria for assessment:
1. Assessment of Heat induced thrombosis
2. Ecchymosis was confirmed 72 h after operation when the lividity and congestion area was
>1 cm2 in the affected limbs.
3. Skin burns were identified 72 h after operation when the skin was red and oedematous
according to the criteria for burns.
4. Recurrence was defined by both duplex ultrasound and the clinical examination. A
varicose vein that had not been observed before or previously been marked by the patient
on the AVVQ form was considered to be a recurrent varicose vein (owing to
neo-vascularization or dilation of pre-existing veins).7,11
5. Sensory impairment (numbness) that occurred around incisions was recorded based on the
patient's history and physical examination.
QoL assessment The diseased relation effect on QoL was determined using the AVVQ (Chinese
version), which assessed the specific effect on QoL and was scored from 0 (no effect of VVS
on QoL) to a theoretical maximum of 100.8 The VCSS (Chinese version) was also completed (for
the VCSS, 0 represents no significant venous disease and 30 is the maximum score), which is a
valid sensitive and responsive measure of the severity of VVs.
Statistical analysis
· The data will be analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. The numerical
outcomes e.g. age is calculated as mean. Gender will be recorded as frequency and percentage.
Chi Square test is applied to assess the association of various parameters. The results will
be considered statistically significant if the p-value is found to be less than or equal to
0.05.