Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05409976
Other study ID # VNS 21-05
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 25, 2022
Est. completion date January 2029

Study information

Verified date April 2024
Source W.L.Gore & Associates
Contact Carl Conway
Phone 6175952277
Email cconway@wlgore.com
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study is a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study to evaluate the performance, safety, and efficacy of the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent for treatment of symptomatic inferior vena cava obstruction with or without combined iliofemoral obstruction in adult patients.


Description:

A maximum of 35 clinical investigative sites across the U.S., Europe, Australia, and New Zealand will participate in this study. One hundred and eleven subjects are intended to be implanted with the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent in this study, with a limit of 22 treated subjects per site and a minimum of 45 patients treated within the United States. Subjects will be evaluated through hospital discharge and return for follow-up visits at 1, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-treatment.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 111
Est. completion date January 2029
Est. primary completion date January 2025
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Preoperative Inclusion Criteria: - Patient is at least 18 years of age. - Patient is willing and able to comply with all follow-up evaluations as well as any required medication or compression regimen. - Patient is able to provide informed consent. - One of the following: Clinical severity class of CEAP 'C' classification =3 or rVCSS pain score =2. - Intention to treat the target areas with only the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent. - Estimated life expectancy =1 year. - Patient is ambulatory (use of assistive walking device such as a cane or walker is acceptable). - Patient has adequate inflow to the target lesion(s), per investigator/sub-investigator discretion, involving at least a patent femoral or deep femoral vein. Preoperative Exclusion Criteria: - Patient is a pregnant or breastfeeding woman, a woman planning to become pregnant through the 12-month visit, or a woman who is unwilling to practice an acceptable method of preventing pregnancy through the 12-month visit. - Patient has clinically significant (e.g., symptoms of chest pain, hemoptysis, dyspnea, hypoxia, etc.) pulmonary embolism (confirmed via Computed Tomography Angiography) at the time of enrollment. - Patient has a known uncorrectable bleeding diathesis or active coagulopathy meeting the following definitions: uncorrected INR>2 (not as a result of warfarin or DOAC therapy), OR platelet count <50,000 or >1,000,000 cells/mm3, OR white blood cell count <3,000 or >12,500 cells/mm3. - Patient has impaired renal function (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2) or is currently on dialysis. - Patient has uncorrected hemoglobin of <9 g/dL. - Patient has known history of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or patients with hypercoagulable states that are unwilling to take anticoagulant medications on a long-term basis. - Patient has known homozygous inherited coagulation defect or Protein C/S deficiency. - Patient has a planned surgical intervention (other than pre-stenting procedures such as thrombolysis or thrombectomy) within 30 days prior to or within 30 days after the planned study procedure. - Patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the endpoints of this treatment, in the opinion of the investigator/sub-investigator. Observational studies are permitted. - Patient has had a previous major (i.e., above the ankle) amputation of the target lower limb. - Patient has known sensitivity to device materials or contraindication to antiplatelets, thrombolytics, anticoagulants (including patients with known prior instances of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2)), or iodinated contrast. - Patient has had prior stenting or grafts in the target vessels. - Patient has a known or suspected active systemic infection at the time of the index procedure. Patients with a chronic infection (e.g., HIV, hepatitis C) that is well controlled under their current treatment regimen may be eligible. - Patient has known history of intravenous drug abuse within one year of treatment. - Patient has significant peripheral arterial disease (chronic Rutherford Type 2 or greater, acute Rutherford Type IIa or greater). - Patient has a BMI >40. - Patient is actively undergoing or plans to begin cancer treatment. Intraoperative Inclusion Criteria: - Presence of non-malignant obstruction of the inferior vena cava defined as occlusion or at least 50% reduction in target vessel lumen as measured by procedural IVUS and venogram, with or without non-malignant obstruction of the common femoral vein, external iliac vein, and/or common iliac vein. - Patient can accommodate an appropriately sized GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent as per reference vessel diameter (see IFU), as determined by intraoperative IVUS post pre-dilation. - Patient must have appropriate access vessels to accommodate the delivery sheath for the selected device size. - Patient has adequate landing zones free from significant disease requiring treatment within the native vessels beyond the proximal and distal margins of the lesion. - Patient has adequate inflow to the target lesion(s), per investigator/sub-investigator discretion, involving at least a patent femoral or deep femoral vein. - Lesion can be traversed with a guidewire. - Disease involves the inferior vena cava and may include iliofemoral segments with intent to stent all affected iliofemoral and caval segments. - Patient does not have significant (i.e., >20% residual thrombosis) acute thrombus within the target stent area at the time of investigational device placement. Patients with acute thrombus within the target stent area must have thrombus successfully treated prior to investigational device placement. Successful thrombus treatment is defined as reestablishment of antegrade flow with =20% residual thrombosis as confirmed by IVUS and venogram, AND freedom from bleeding, vascular injury, or hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. After successful thrombus treatment, investigational device placement can occur within the same procedure. - Patient does not have an inferior vena cava filter present within the target stent area at the time of investigational device placement. Patients with an inferior vena cava filter present within the target stent area must have the filter successfully removed prior to investigational device placement. Successful removal is defined as removal of the main body of the filter and intra-luminal fragments such that there is minimal risk to luminal integrity per investigator/sub-investigator discretion AND freedom from bleeding, vascular injury, or hemodynamically significant pulmonary embolism. After successful filter removal, investigational device placement can occur within the same procedure.

Study Design


Intervention

Device:
GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent
Treatment of symptomatic IVC obstruction with or without combined iliofemoral obstruction with the GORE® VIAFORT Vascular Stent.

Locations

Country Name City State
Australia Flinders Medical Centre Adelaide South Australia
Australia Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia
Australia Royal Perth Hospital Perth Western Australia
Germany Universitätsklinikum Aachen Aachen
Germany Klinikum Hochsauerland GmbH Arnsberg
Ireland University College Hospital GALWAY /Clinical Research Facility Galway Galway Connaught
Italy Ospedale San Raffaele Milan
Italy Hesperia Hospital Modena
New Zealand Auckland City Hospital Auckland
United Kingdom Addenbrooke's Hospital Cambridge
United Kingdom St Thomas' Hospital London
United Kingdom John Radcliffe - Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford
United States University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
United States Atrium Health-Sanger Heart and Vascular Institute Charlotte North Carolina
United States Northwestern Chicago Illinois
United States Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland Ohio
United States OhioHealth Research Institute Columbus Ohio
United States Yale University New Haven Connecticut
United States Mount Sinai Medical Center New York New York
United States Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York
United States Sentara Norfolk Virginia
United States Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford California
United States MedStar Washington Hospital Center Washington District of Columbia

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
W.L.Gore & Associates

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

United States,  Australia,  Germany,  Ireland,  Italy,  New Zealand,  United Kingdom, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Composite of efficacy and safety events Composite primary endpoint consisting of freedom from the following:
Loss of primary patency through 12-month follow-up
Stent embolization through 12-month follow-up
Device- or procedure-related death through 30 days
Clinically significant pulmonary embolism confirmed via Computed Tomography Angiography through 30 days
Device- or procedure-related vascular injury through 30 days requiring surgical or endovascular intervention
Device- or procedure-related major bleeding events through 30 days
12 months
Secondary Number of subjects with primary patency as confirmed by imaging and adverse events Number of subjects with freedom from both:
stent occlusion due to restenosis or thrombosis as confirmed with imaging, and
clinically driven target lesion revascularization as confirmed with imaging and adverse events
60 months
Secondary Number of subjects with secondary patency as confirmed by imaging and adverse events Number of subjects with freedom from permanent loss of blood flow through the device, regardless of reintervention. 60 months
Secondary Number of subjects with clinically driven target lesion revascularization as confirmed by imaging and adverse events Number of subjects with repeat endovascular procedures (e.g., PTA, stenting, thrombectomy/thrombolysis) to restore flow, performed within the margins of the investigational devices due to =50% restenosis of the target lesion as measured via imaging AND the failure to improve or recurrence of venous origin leg pain or venous edema related to the target lesion present at baseline, or the onset of new symptoms including venous origin pain and venous edema related to the target lesion. 60 months
Secondary Number of subjects with device fracture as confirmed with imaging Number of subjects with device fracture as confirmed with imaging. 60 months
Secondary Number of subjects with stent embolization as confirmed with imaging Number of subjects with stent embolization as confirmed with imaging. 12 months
Secondary Number of subjects with device- or procedure-related death Number of subjects with device- or procedure-related death. 30 days
Secondary Number of subjects with clinically significant pulmonary embolism as confirmed with imaging and adverse events Number of subjects with clinically significant pulmonary embolism confirmed via Computed Tomography Angiography through 30 days. 30 days
Secondary Number of subjects with device- or procedure-related vascular injury as confirmed with adverse events Number of subjects with device- or procedure-related vascular injury through 30 days requiring surgical or endovascular intervention. 30 days
Secondary Number of subjects with device- or procedure-related major bleeding events as confirmed with adverse events Number of subjects with device- or procedure-related major bleeding events through 30 days. 30 days
Secondary Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS) Change in Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS) Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment.
Note: The rVCSS scale ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores reflecting worse symptoms.
60 months
Secondary Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS) Pain Change in Revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale (rVCSS) Pain Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment.
Note: The rVCSS Pain scale ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores reflecting worse pain.
60 months
Secondary Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study - Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) VEINES-QOL/Sym Change in Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study - Quality of Life/Symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym) Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment. 60 months
Secondary Villalta Change in Villalta Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment. 60 months
Secondary 5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) Change in 5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) Measurement through 60-month follow-up compared to baseline prior to treatment. 60 months
Secondary Technical success Number of subjects with successful delivery and deployment of the stent to the intended location, and removal of delivery system. Index procedure (post-op day 0)
Secondary Lesion success Number of subjects with evidence of =50% residual stenosis at the conclusion of the index procedure as measured by IVUS or venogram. Index procedure (post-op day 0)
Secondary Procedural success Number of subjects with lesion success and the absence of major adverse events (i.e., stent embolization, device- or procedure-related death, clinically significant pulmonary embolism, device- or procedure-related vascular injury requiring surgical or endovascular intervention, and device- or procedure-related major bleeding) prior to discharge. Index procedure through hospital discharge (discharge estimated as up to 30 days post-treatment)
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT03903692 - A Comparative Evaluation of a MPS Dressing and a CMC Dressing on Subjects With Lower Extremity Venous Ulcers N/A
Completed NCT03257254 - Effect of VarIthena on Wound Healing in Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU)
Recruiting NCT03666754 - Early Glue Saphenous Vein Ablation With Compression Versus Compression Alone in the Healing of the Venous Ulcer N/A
Withdrawn NCT02912858 - Intermittent Pneumatic Compression of the Foot vs Geko Plus R-2 Neuromuscular Electrostimulation Device in Venous Leg Ulcer Patients N/A
Completed NCT02482038 - Geko Venous Leg Ulcer Study N/A
Completed NCT02652572 - Safety Study to Examine the Systemic Exposure of Granexin® Gel After Topical Application to Venous Leg Ulcers Phase 1
Unknown status NCT01658618 - Safety Study Providing 12 Months Follow-up From First Exposure to HP802-247 in Subjects With Venous Leg Ulcer N/A
Completed NCT05646121 - Suprasorb® A + Ag in the Treatment of Wounds at Risk of Infection and Infected Wounds
Completed NCT03077165 - Dose-response Relationship Study of S42909 on Leg Ulcer Healing Phase 2
Completed NCT04461132 - The Effect of Manual Lymphatic Drainage N/A
Completed NCT05974982 - Treatment Outcome of Autologous PRP Versus Conventional Therapy Among Patients With Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers Phase 1
Completed NCT04011371 - Cyanoacrylate Closure for Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03543007 - Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of GrafixPL™PRIME for the Treatment of Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers N/A
Completed NCT03286140 - Early Venous Reflux Ablation Ulcer Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT05588583 - A Clinical Investigation to Follow the Progress of Exuding Chronic Wounds Using Mepilex® Up as the Primary Dressing. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04613687 - Efficacy and Safety of a New Compression System URGO BD001 in the Treatment of VLU (FREEDOM) N/A
Recruiting NCT05549609 - A Study of XSTEM-VLU in Patients With Difficult-to-heal Venous Leg Ulcers Phase 1/Phase 2
Not yet recruiting NCT05089890 - Clinical Investigation of Sorbact® Dressings N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03670329 - Management of Infection Risk in Non-comparative Trial (MINT) N/A
Completed NCT02921750 - Investigation to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Exufiber Versus Aquacel Extra in Moderately or Strongly Exuding Venous and Mixed Ulcers of Predominantly Venous Origin N/A