Vascular Myelopathy clinical trials

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

View clinical trials related to Vascular Myelopathy.

Filter by:

None
Page 1

NCT ID: NCT04372758 Completed - Spinal Cord Stroke Clinical Trials

Descriptive Study of Acute Spontaneous Spinal Cord Infarction

EDMIAS

Start date: May 30, 2020
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Acute spontaneous Spinal Cord Infarctions (SCI) are an uncommon cause of myelopathy (5%), but their prognostic is heterogeneous and frequently severe. Positive diagnosis is difficult, one quarter of initial MRIs are normal. Differential diagnosis with other transverse myelopathy causes is a common issue. As in cerebral stroke, there are multiple causes and mechanisms in spontaneous SCI, often difficult to clearly establish. There are also clinical and radiological patterns, sometimes misleading, according to vascular territory and its expanse. Due to its scarcity and heterogeneity, improving knowledge and medical care remains difficult. Medical care is still badly codified in medical literature. Recently, diagnostic criteria have been proposed to better identify SCI, provide earlier care and homogenize future research. External validity and reproduction of these new criteria among acute myelopathies are still to be validated. While there is no established medical treatment in the initial care of spontaneous SCI, some case reports show successful treatment with IV thrombolysis. Given the severe prognosis, conventional treatment of strokes (thrombolysis, anticoagulant and antiplatelet), could be considered on an individual scale, in a specific protocol. A better knowledge of radio-clinical and security factors are necessary to support this approach. In order to respond to these difficulties, a retrospective cohort will allow us to better define epidemiological, clinico-radiological and prognostic features of spontaneous SCI. It lays the foundation of a possible prospective multicentric cohort, necessary for specific therapeutic studies.