View clinical trials related to Vascular Access.
Filter by:All participants in this clinical trial will be undergoing surgery and will have a central venous catheter (also known as a central line) placed in the large vein in the neck as part of their routine care. The purpose of this clinical trial is to compare different ways of dressing central lines. In current standard care, central lines are stitched in place and covered with a protective transparent dressing. This standard care will be compared with the addition of a haemostatic powder beneath the transparent dressing. This powder product aids clotting at the level of the skin, meaning that it prevents or reduces bleeding while helping to maintain a dry and protected environment. The main questions this clinical trial aims to answer are: - Will the addition of a haemostatic powder increase the durability of central line dressings? - What proportion of dressings required an unplanned change? - The reason(s) for any unplanned change - The incidence of bleeding around central line insertion sites - Were any skin problems observed once the dressings were removed? Once the dressings are applied, all central lines sites will be monitored as part of the participant's routine care. Participation in the clinical trial lasts as long as the first central line dressing remains in place. Central line dressings currently and routinely remain in place for up to, but not more than seven days. After this period, there will be no need for any research-related observations. Routine care will continue and will not be affected by the research. Participants will not be asked to make any extra visits over and above those needed for routine care.
The perioperative setting is a common site of pediatric anxiety and distress. Perioperative anxiety in pediatric patients can result in uncooperative behavior, poor postoperative outcomes, and trauma. Given the fast-paced nature of the perioperative environment, many anxiety measures are too time consuming for clinical implementation prior to surgery. Pediatric anesthesiologists need reliable and efficient assessment tools to quickly measure childhood distress to target prophylactic and therapeutic interventions.
Peripheral intravenous line insertion is the most commonly performed invasive procedure in the emergency department (ED). The research hypothesis is that a biplane sonographic approach (i.e., an out-of-plane and in-plane view) might be superior to a mono-plane approach (i.e., an out-of-plane or in-plane view) obtaining a peripheral vascular access among difficult patients admitted to the ED
Vascular access involves central and peripheral vein accesses and arterial accesses. Central venous catheterization is widely used in clinical practice for diverse purposes, including hemodialysis for end stage renal failure, invasive hemodynamic monitoring, radiological studies, infusion of drugs that cannot be administered via peripheral vessels, administration of parenteral nutrition, vascular access in patients whose peripheral veins are difficult to be catheterized and for miscellaneous purposes that require access to large caliber vessels. Arterial cannulation is used for invasive arterial pressure monitoring and to ensure access for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. In the United States and United Kingdom, guidelines have recommended the use of ultrasound guidance to reduce complications and improve success in central venous catheterization.
The aim of this study is to investigate whether there is any difference between the use of standard techniques, ultrasonography and infra-red light for the success of the first attempt in difficult peripheral vascular access patients. Patients who have difficult vascular access history ( often need 2 or more attempt to access peripheral intravenous catheter), who do not have palpable or visible vein after tourniquet, and who have the hard anticipation according to operator ( easy-moderate-hard) are included to study. The primary objective is planned as the determination of the success rate in the first attempt. Secondary aims of the study were determined as: total procedure time,total number of attempts, and need for rescue procedure
Venepuncture and peripheral intravenous cannulation are commonly performed in children and may cause substantial pain and distress. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of EMLA cream and Buzzy device in pain and distress relief during venipuncture or peripheral vascular access in hospitalized children. The study is an open randomized controlled study. Eligible children will be randomized to receive the application of EMLA cream 60 minutes before the needle procedure or the application of EMLA 60 minutes before the procedure and the use of Buzzy device during procedure. The primary study outcome will be the mean distress score experienced by children at the moment of the procedure, evaluated with the CEMS scale. Secondary outcomes will be the mean distress score recorded by operators; the self-reported mean pain score; the mean pain score reported by parents and operators.
Overall survival of patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (*OHCA*) is less than 10% worldwide and in Taiwan. Interventions provided by the emergency medical system (*EMS*) before arrival at the hospital are of paramount importance to patient outcomes after OHCA. Among those interventions, the pros-and-cons of different vascular accesses, including intraosseous (*IO*) access or intravenous (*IV*) access, remained the issue of most under debate. The objective of this study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of IO access vs IV access in patients with OHCA by a randomized controlled trial (*RCT*) in Taipei EMS. To name in short, the investigators called it a "*VICTOR* trial" standing for "Venous Injection Compared To intraOsseous injection during Resuscitation of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest".
This is a Phase 2, prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of the Human Acellular Vessel (HAV).
This first-in-human pilot study seeks to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using a percutaneous ultrasound device with needle guide for vascular access. Eligible participants will undergo the procedure of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for primary or metastatic liver cancer, as part of participants' clinical care. The percutaneous ultrasound device with needle guide will be deployed in eligible participants at the beginning of the procedure for guiding a needle inside the femoral artery. Once the needle is inside the artery, then a guide wire is advanced inside the needle and vascular access is successfully obtained. The study will identify whether this ultrasound-based device with needle guide is helpful for guiding a needle inside the femoral artery.
Peripheral intravenous cannulation is one of the most common procedures performed in children admitted to hospital. It is a painful and anxiety-provoking gesture for children with possible memorization of the pain even more present for patients with chronic pathology. Nevertheless, this care is essential to administer the treatments. The cannulation is usually set up by the observation and touching of the veins by the nurse. However, this technique is often insufficient in young children and especially infants because they have a higher thickness adipose tissue. Their veins are of small caliber, hardly visible and palpable which increases the probability of a failure of the insertion of the catheter at the first attempt. In the literature, different techniques are mentioned to promote the visualization of veins and thus the insertion of cannulation. The AccuVein®400 (AV400) system uses an infrared laser beam to project the image of superficial veins to the skin. In adults, AV400 has been shown to improve the success rate of insertion cannulation when venous capital is precarious. The question now arises as to whether this tool could be of interest to children who are particularly difficult to assist cannulation, especially the youngest of them. Investigator hypothesize that AV400 could bring a benefit to the placement of cannulation, in the child with a venous capital difficult to catheterize and thus increase the success of the cannulation at the first attempt.