Sacrocolpopexy With Posterior Repair Obstructed Defecation Symptoms

Status Active, not recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Participants who undergo laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) plus posterior repair (PR) will demonstrate greater improvement bowel symptom scores compared to participants who undergo LSCP alone at 3 months postoperatively.

Clinical Trial Description

Those who provide informed consent will be randomized into either laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) alone or laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) plus posterior repair (PR). Participants will be randomized with equal probability to the LSCP only arm or LSCP plus PR arm. The surgical technique for LSCP will be similar to that described by Paraiso et al. for LSCP [14] and by Elliott et al. for robot-assisted LSCP [15], with minor variations. A Y-shaped polypropylene mesh graft, 10 cm in standard length and tailored to each patient's anatomic specifications during surgery, will be used with all SCP procedures. PR is performed by midline fascial plication. Plication of superficial perineal muscles (perineorrhaphy) is performed in conjunction with PR. All repairs are performed using polydioxanone 2/0 for fascial repair and 4/0 polyglactin suture for skin closure. Participants will also complete questionnaires and undergo an endovaginal ultrasound (using a 9-16 MHz, 360° rotational transducer, type 8838, BK Medical, Peabody, MA) prior to surgery and three months following surgery. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT03658395
Study type	Interventional
Source	University of Oklahoma
Contact
Status	Active, not recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	July 19, 2018
Completion date	December 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04701047` - Prospective Observational Prolapse Study
Recruiting	`NCT03664986` - Pudendal Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Standard Treatment During Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT00388947` - Observational Data Collection of Surgical Outcomes in the Treatment of Vaginal Prolapse With AMS Products	N/A
Active, not recruiting	`NCT00442247` - A Randomised, Controlled Study of Bimesh, Pelvicol for Vaginal Wall Prolapse	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04078802` - 0050-19-RMB CTIL - VNOTES Compared to VH for Vaginal Apex Prolapse	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT00918099` - The Use of Avaulta for Anterior Repair	N/A
Completed	`NCT00769054` - Local Infiltration Analgesia With Ropivacaine in Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse:a Randomized, Double-Blind Study	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT03187574` - Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse	N/A
Completed	`NCT00679276` - Treatment Outcomes of Vaginal Prolapse Repair	N/A
Completed	`NCT03338400` - Dexamethasone Administration To Improve Patient Recovery In Ambulatory Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Is There A Role?	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT00153231` - Posterior IVS Versus Sacrospinous Suspension in Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT01409902` - Using a Sheathed Speculum to Visualize and Access the Cervix In Women With Excessive Vaginal Tissue	N/A
Completed	`NCT00557882` - Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT00196495` - Clinical Assessment of the Total Vaginal Mesh Technique for Treatment of Genital Prolapse	Phase 4
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06234449` - The Impact of Long-term Pessary Use on Pelvic Organ Prolapse oìduring Covid-19 Pandemic in Patients Attending Surgery
Recruiting	`NCT05449054` - Continuous Stitches Versus Simple Interrupted Stitches for Anterior Colporrhaphy	N/A
Completed	`NCT00475540` - Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse	N/A
Enrolling by invitation	`NCT00571350` - Anterior Vaginal Wall Reconstruction	Phase 1/Phase 2
Not yet recruiting	`NCT03333811` - Sexual Function After Vaginal Repair With Perineorrhaphy	N/A
Completed	`NCT02431897` - Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence of the Vagina Using Estrogen	Phase 4