Vaginal Prolapse Clinical Trial
Official title:
The Use of Avaulta for Anterior Repair. A Multicenter Randomised Prospective Controlled Study
Summary:
Vaginal prolapse is a well-known disease and is observed in approximately 11% of all
postmenopausal women and tending to increase with age. Consequently, many surgical
procedures have been developed in order to ensure sufficient support for the bladder, rectum
or vaginal vault depending on the site of the defect. However, many procedures are
associated with a high recurrence rate up to 40 % even within one to two years after the
surgical procedure.
Due to the high recurrence rate new methods include the use of mesh, either biologically or
synthetic. The latter is a permanent implant and therefore theoretically may result in a
long-lasting anatomically correct position of the prolapse.
Although the recurrence rate may be lower using a mesh such surgical procedures may be
associated with adverse events such as erosions of the vaginal mucosa. Others have observed
shrinkage of the vaginal mucosa. However, in these studies large prolene mesh have been
used. In contrast the recurrence rate is lowered up to 25%.
The above-mentioned advantage of synthetic mesh is however, mostly based on few
non-randomised studies. The investigators therefore find it of importance to evaluate
whether a surgical procedure using a mesh implant is superior to conventional surgical
techniques. The present study is a clinical controlled study where patients with anterior
vaginal prolapse are randomised to either a mesh technique or a standard anterior procedure.
The present study includes only two more visits at the outpatient clinic after the surgical
procedure. Furthermore the patients have to fulfil questionnaires regarding urinary and
faecal leakage and sexual habits.
Any participation in the study is totally voluntary and the patient may at any time withdraw
herself. In any case the patient will receive the investigators' standard treatment.
RESEARCH PROTOCOL:
The use of Avaulta for anterior repair. A multicenter randomised prospective controlled
study.
BACKGROUND:
During the resent years the methods for pelvic organ prolapse repair have changed rapidly.
The reason for this is several. Firstly, there is a relative high recurrence rate in
patients having an anterior vaginal repair. Thus, the rate has been estimated to be close to
40% or even higher and most often the recurrences occurs within the first two years. Weber
et al and Sand et al reported various techniques of the anterior colporrhaphy without the
use of mesh to be successful in the management of cystoceles in only 42 and 57%,
respectively. In contrast others have shown a much lower 1-year recurrence rate. Shull
reported on the safety and efficacy of the paravaginal repair but this procedure may also
vary in success from 67 - 100%. Taken all together however, interpretation of these studies
is difficult since the patients included have undergone at least one (in most cases several)
vaginal surgical procedures at the same time and some studies even include patients with
recurrence together with patients scheduled for primary vaginal surgery. Secondly, there is
a need for simple procedures, which can be performed in an outpatient clinic and thirdly,
the surgery should be acceptable for the women, i.e. without postoperative pain, short
recovery period and no need for further surgical intervention.
In most centers a vaginal surgical repair of an anterior genital prolapse is performed in a
standard manner through a midline incision followed by dissection of the vaginal mucosa from
the pubocervical fascia. Interrupted sutures approximating the fascia at the midline then
repair the cystocele. However, this may not be sufficient in those cases where no fascia is
present or the presence of huge defects in the pubocervical fascia. As a consequence the use
of mesh have been more popular. Several studies report a reduced recurrence rate following
anterior repair using different types of mesh such as biomesh (6,7) or nonabsorbable mesh.
The latter has been shown to be associated with vaginal erosion 8 - 2%%, which probably is
related to the strong inflammatory response observed after implementation of such mesh.
Another complication is shrinkage of the vaginal mucosa and this may be followed by sexual
dysfunction or dyspareunia.
Polypropylene mesh appears to induce less inflammatory respons compared to other types. A
specific type of mesh is the Avaulta Biosynthetic Mesh, which is a polypropylene mesh coated
with collagen. This layer protects against inflammatory response and is slowly resolved.
Since most studies have included patients undergoing several vaginal surgical procedures at
the same time, it is difficult to conclude whether or not the use of mesh is superior
compared to conventional technique. Furthermore, only sparse information is available
regarding sexual function and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse surgery. Especially
there is a lack of information regarding new mesh types.
The purpose of the present study is therefore to test the hypothesis that the Avaulta
Biosynthetic Mesh is associated with a lower recurrence rate after two years of follow-up
compared to conventional anterior repair. Secondly, the study is planned to evaluate the
frequency of sexual dysfunction following vaginal anterior repair, and if there is any
difference between the two surgical methods.
;
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04701047 -
Prospective Observational Prolapse Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT03664986 -
Pudendal Block Using Liposomal Bupivacaine vs. Standard Treatment During Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00388947 -
Observational Data Collection of Surgical Outcomes in the Treatment of Vaginal Prolapse With AMS Products
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00442247 -
A Randomised, Controlled Study of Bimesh, Pelvicol for Vaginal Wall Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04078802 -
0050-19-RMB CTIL - VNOTES Compared to VH for Vaginal Apex Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00769054 -
Local Infiltration Analgesia With Ropivacaine in Posterior Vaginal Wall Prolapse:a Randomized, Double-Blind Study
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT03187574 -
Comparison of Two Vaginal Mesh Kits in the Management of Vaginal Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00679276 -
Treatment Outcomes of Vaginal Prolapse Repair
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03338400 -
Dexamethasone Administration To Improve Patient Recovery In Ambulatory Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Is There A Role?
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00153231 -
Posterior IVS Versus Sacrospinous Suspension in Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT01409902 -
Using a Sheathed Speculum to Visualize and Access the Cervix In Women With Excessive Vaginal Tissue
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00557882 -
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Anterior Prolapse
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT00196495 -
Clinical Assessment of the Total Vaginal Mesh Technique for Treatment of Genital Prolapse
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06234449 -
The Impact of Long-term Pessary Use on Pelvic Organ Prolapse oìduring Covid-19 Pandemic in Patients Attending Surgery
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03658395 -
Sacrocolpopexy With Posterior Repair Obstructed Defecation Symptoms
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05449054 -
Continuous Stitches Versus Simple Interrupted Stitches for Anterior Colporrhaphy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00475540 -
Efficacy Study of Vaginal Mesh for Prolapse
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT00571350 -
Anterior Vaginal Wall Reconstruction
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03333811 -
Sexual Function After Vaginal Repair With Perineorrhaphy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02431897 -
Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence of the Vagina Using Estrogen
|
Phase 4 |