View clinical trials related to Vaginal Prolapse.
Filter by:The aim of this prospective study is investigation of efficiency and safety of medical device "Magic Gyno" in accordance with the stated purpose. To assess the condition of the vaginal walls and vulva before and after laser treatment, the following methods will be used: gynecology examination, vaginal health index, clinical blood test, vaginal flora examination, vaginal pH. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF), Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and The Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) will be used to collect feedback on changes in the participants life quality. Total up to 70 participants with pathology of pelvic organs will be involved in the study. Participants will be divided into two groups: group with genitourinary symptoms and group with vaginal relaxation symptoms, by 35 participants in each. The time intervals between tests will be the same for both groups. The main hypothesis of the study is improvement in condition of the vaginal walls after laser treatment compared with the condition before treatment.
This trial will assess whether use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts sensation during filling (i.e., a change of more than 25% of first sensation, first desire to void, strong desire to void, or maximum cystometric capacity) and determine whether the use of intraurethral 2% lidocaine jelly meaningfully impacts pain/discomfort, filling metrics, and voiding metrics.
To the investigators knowledge there are no studies in the literature evaluating the effect of Dexamethasone administration on patients undergoing outpatient vaginal prolapse surgeries.
Our study is a non-randomized prospective study compared two groups matched for anterior/apical POP-Q grade: 84 received Elevate Ant™ single-incision mesh (group A) and 42 Perigee™ transvaginal mesh (group B). The study hypothesis was that the Elevate Ant™ mesh would provide better apical correction than the Perigee™ mesh. One- and 2-year follow-up comprised anatomic assessment (POP-Q) and QoL (PFDI-20, PFIQ-7, PISQ-12). Success was defined as 2-year POP-Q ≤1. Secondary endpoints were function and complications.
This study randomizes postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse planning native tissue transvaginal surgical repair to 6-8 weeks of preoperative and 1-year continued postoperative vaginal estrogen cream compared to placebo cream. This clinical trial and basic science investigation are designed to understand the mechanisms by which local estrogen treatment affects connective tissues of the pelvic floor and determine whether its use before and after prolapse repair will (i) improve success rates of the surgical intervention and minimize prolapse recurrence and (ii) impact favorably upon symptoms of other pelvic floor disorders.
The main objective of the study is to assess the effectiveness of the sheathed speculum in providing adequate visualization and access to the cervix in patients with excessive vaginal tissue. The secondary objective is to rate the patient's comfort evaluation during the sheathed speculum examination.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes in patients having vaginal prolapse repair with the Elevate prolapse repair kit and compare these outcomes to patients who had a repair with Prolift. .
The purpose of this study is to compare systematic local infiltration with ropivacaine or placebo in patients undergoing repair of posterior vaginal wall prolapse. The hypothesis is that LIA technique is opioid-sparing and a better postoperative treatment.
Chart review conducted on all patients having had Prolift surgery since 2005 by Dr. Lary Sirls, Dr. Predeep Nagaraju and Dr. Kenneth Peters at William Beaumont Hospital.
Pelvic organ prolapse is characterized by a lack of pelvic floor support causing the pelvic organs and vaginal walls to protrude. For decades, suture repair techniques have been the primary choice of surgical treatment when indicated. Traditional surgical techniques are frequently associated with unsatisfying anatomical recurrence rates and it is plausible that inherently weak, or damaged, pelvic floor supportive tissues need to be reinforced by a permanent support to avoid the high rates of recurrences commonly described using traditional techniques. Over the years sporadic attempts have been made to introduce novel surgical techniques using a variety of biomaterials with varying success. Despite a lack of clinical safety data, or compelling clinical evidence demonstrating that it improves outcomes compared to traditional suture techniques, use of biomaterials in pelvic reconstructive surgery has become widespread in just a few years . It is likely that biomaterials need to be "anchored" in tissues not afflicted by the disease, in order to provide the intended pelvic floor support. This has given rise to transvaginal surgical techniques using a transobturator approach passing the mesh through the arcus tendineous fascia pelvis, or the sacrospinous ligaments through a transgluteal approach. Short term data from concluded and on-going safety assessments of these techniques has provided promising results and satisfying clinical outcomes. The aim of the present study is to compare anterior mesh repair (PROLIFT®) with traditional suture repair in a randomised trial.